The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Would U rather have a full head-on or a half one, only, collision?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Would U rather have a full head-on or a half one, only, collision?

  • 8 Replies
  • 2236 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Curious Cat (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 38
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 33 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Would U rather have a full head-on or a half one, only, collision?
« on: 30/09/2021 10:30:53 »
.
« Last Edit: 03/10/2021 07:43:31 by Curious Cat »
Logged
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6174
  • Activity:
    21%
  • Thanked: 646 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would U rather have a full head-on or a single side one, only, collision?
« Reply #1 on: 30/09/2021 13:53:25 »
Quote from: Furious Cat on 30/09/2021 10:30:53
If U couldn't avoid a head-on, collision, with another car:
Would U rather have a full head-on or a single side one, only, collision?
definitely front on. The neck muscles are stronger at resisting forward motion of the head, side of neck muscles far less so and so side whiplash results in a broken neck - thats why a noose knot is put at the side.
Also, side air bags are less effective at the moment.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, Curious Cat

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27735
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 933 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would U rather have a full head-on or a single side one, only, collision?
« Reply #2 on: 30/09/2021 17:21:17 »
It isn't that simple.
What if the single side collision just meant we both lost a wing mirror?
Or we just ripped the bodywork in a glancing blow or .... whatever.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, Curious Cat

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27735
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 933 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would U rather have a full head-on or a single side one, only, collision?
« Reply #3 on: 30/09/2021 17:42:42 »
if only there was someone  we could ask.
In the mean time, here is some music.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: Just thinking

Offline Just thinking

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1009
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 144 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Would U rather have a full head-on or a half one, only, collision?
« Reply #4 on: 30/09/2021 21:37:05 »
A safe way to drive is to scan the sides of the road 80% and the centre 20% this way you will have a better chance of finding with confidence a safer run off aria if needed. I live in the country and when driving I am constantly looking for a level run off as if needed I will go for the fence and the field. PS trees and power poles are not our friends. As for the question a full head on will give a better chance of survival. One more PS. It hurts less if you're killed.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, Curious Cat



Offline Just thinking

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1009
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 144 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Would U rather have a full head-on or a half one, only, collision?
« Reply #5 on: 01/10/2021 08:08:20 »
I only walk to the fridge to get a beer 24 bottles x 14 metres = 336 metres a day. My wife said that not enough exercise so I said get me two cartons of beer then. 336 x2 = 672 metres I worked it out if the distance gets too much for me I will just have to move the fridge closer to the living room. The other upside is I get the drink not the car and you cant get booked for drink walking.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6174
  • Activity:
    21%
  • Thanked: 646 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would U rather have a full head-on or a half one, only, collision?
« Reply #6 on: 01/10/2021 08:53:06 »
Quote from: Furious Cat on 30/09/2021 19:26:13
Yes U're right, it's called the frontal offset crash.
I’m surprised at you Kiddiwink, that’s what it used to be called  ;D
Now called overlap test, two types small and moderate overlap. Less protection in the wings.
I was actually meaning full side on, getting T’d. Not only side whiplash but head hitting side, more intrusion into vehicle etc.
I did read once that you are better to try for a grazing contact (don’t try this at home kids) but I’m not sure many untrained people are able to steer and brake with such accuracy with such little notice.  Also steering while braking means greater braking distance, chance of car slewing, rolling etc. Not something I hope to try.
« Last Edit: 01/10/2021 09:00:33 by Colin2B »
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline Zer0

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 85 times
  • Homo EviliUs
    • View Profile
Re: Would U rather have a full head-on or a half one, only, collision?
« Reply #7 on: 01/10/2021 17:14:59 »
WooW B_C!
😲

Quite Unexpected coming from you, but nonetheless Pleasant.
(Hope ur okay)
🤞

Ps - Mmmmm Mmmmm...
Mmm..Mmm..Mmm..Mmm.
😇
Logged
1N73LL1G3NC3  15  7H3  481L17Y  70  4D4P7  70  CH4NG3.
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline nicephotog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 449
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • [ censored ]
    • View Profile
Re: Would U rather have a full head-on or a half one, only, collision?
« Reply #8 on: 04/10/2021 11:57:21 »
That's a bit looney that question, not since South Park and the crippled question.
A head on tends to destroy the face and shear of legs below the knees, whereas a partial off set tends to plain snap the spine and shatter the temple.

South Park crippled asked as a survey question "Do you think it's best to be born a cripple or become a cripple later in life?"
Logged
How To Tutorial (all Java servers) HttpOutPutTools (port to .jar Hell Pig Entelodont) 7th January 2022
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gbz54O8aOUEFOdRa40ZlRM7AtpS4Uj_C/view?usp=sharing
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: car crash  / car accident 
 

Similar topics (5)

What is "A Pocket Full Of Acorns" ?

Started by Andrew K FletcherBoard The Environment

Replies: 86
Views: 94626
Last post 03/05/2014 00:08:42
by menageriemanor
Why is head hair soft, but other hair wirey?

Started by GerryBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 1
Views: 4229
Last post 01/05/2010 07:32:29
by Atomic-S
Why does head hair grow longer than other body hair?

Started by AbbyBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 1
Views: 12783
Last post 02/03/2009 08:37:50
by Chemistry4me
Why does chest hair stop growing, but head hair doesn't?

Started by thedocBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 2
Views: 7619
Last post 13/12/2016 21:35:29
by snorkfort
Why are the half-filled and fully filled orbitals more stable?

Started by IndranilBoard Chemistry

Replies: 4
Views: 7508
Last post 10/09/2018 07:09:02
by Indranil
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.117 seconds with 58 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.