1
Physiology & Medicine / Re: language and intelligence
« on: 21/04/2005 11:41:51 »or to write in my scientific shorthand:
scientific approach
ok, we have a non-deterministic turing machine of sorts that solves wishes/instructions by a belief the wish/instruction can be solved using feeling to guide the input system/senses to the component information required in object/identities with their function/personalities/ and how these objects would behave in different realities/memories/scenarios,
“past recollection and future prediction”
“how object/components would react in a certain situation/reality”
“create the objects and daydream the situation they are in and ask questions”
ie construct daydreams with the “environment” in which the “components” and their “relationships” will form a “motion”
through time. now this can be used for real situations but it can also be used for “imaginary” situations for problem solving purposes, using the quantum computation power of our daydreams/thought process. data is input in the forms of objects and their functions/personality in as much detail as possible by picturing them in our minds.
so an object functional database should be a basis of learning, so definitions need to be made to be learned for basic objects we use everyday and in the case of languages of motion,
“ie physics/chemistry/biology”
and languages of life,
“ie quantum mechanics”
the definitions of the languages need to be agreed universally so there understanding is translatable to any language
“ie English/French/etc”
further more in addition to our spoken language we can add another ‘tongue’ to our language if we have a universally defined science,
and there you go, it'll make sense soon