The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
x=0±1 Proof
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
x=0±1 Proof
6 Replies
2074 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ve9aPrim3
(OP)
Full Member
69
Activity:
0%
x=0±1 Proof
«
on:
17/02/2018 19:25:28 »
Proof:
f(x)=x
f(-x)=f(yz)
f(yz)=x±(0/1)
f(xyz)±f(x)+f(yz)
∅±∞
0±1
f(yz)
=
(0/1) ± x ± (0/1)
=
f(yz)
...........
f(x)=x
f(-x)=f(yz)
f(yz)=x±(0/1)
f(xyz)=f(x)+f(yz)
∅=∞
0=1
I just pictured equations being balanced differently I guess.
1=1
1≠-1
1±1
All these mean the same to me.
"=" is how you balance an equation horizontally.
"±" is how you balance an equation across 3D space.
...Whoops..I mean
f(x)=x
f(-x)=f(yz)
f(yz)=x±(0/1)
f(xyz)±f(x)+f(yz)
∅±∞
0±1
«
Last Edit: 17/02/2018 20:59:42 by
Ve9aPrim3
»
Logged
Inventor of the 4D Matrix
Bored chemist
Naked Science Forum GOD!
30347
Activity:
12%
Thanked: 1217 times
Re: 0=1 Proof
«
Reply #1 on:
17/02/2018 19:53:19 »
Gibberish.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
Ve9aPrim3
(OP)
Full Member
69
Activity:
0%
Re: 0=1 Proof
«
Reply #2 on:
17/02/2018 20:11:48 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/02/2018 19:53:19
Gibberish.
f(x) is used to calculate intercept point
s
across
2D
space
.
0=1 is used to calculate the intercept poin
t
across
3D
space
.
Working with "f(x)" is a great tool in 2D computation, but "0=1" is much more practical in 3D computation.
Logged
Inventor of the 4D Matrix
Ve9aPrim3
(OP)
Full Member
69
Activity:
0%
Re: 0=1 Proof... I mean 0±1 Proof
«
Reply #3 on:
17/02/2018 20:50:27 »
Quote from: Ve9aPrim3 on 17/02/2018 19:25:28
f(yz)=x±(0/1)
f(yz)
=
(0/1) ± x ± (0/1)
=
f(yz)
Logged
Inventor of the 4D Matrix
Bored chemist
Naked Science Forum GOD!
30347
Activity:
12%
Thanked: 1217 times
Re: 0=1 Proof... I mean 0±1 Proof
«
Reply #4 on:
17/02/2018 20:56:08 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/02/2018 19:53:19
Gibberish.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
jeffreyH
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: x=0±1 Proof
«
Reply #5 on:
17/02/2018 21:06:18 »
Why do you bother? You must have something more productive you could be doing. Like popping bubble wrap.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
Colin2B
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6477
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 706 times
Re: x=0±1 Proof
«
Reply #6 on:
18/02/2018 09:27:23 »
OP has requested all further discussion be directed to
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=72397.0
So this topic is now locked
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...