0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Except all waves of the spectrum travel at c.
But this is what my concept says, all waves travel at c, only front waves go slower because of the twisted trajectory which is non linear.
Gravity as an interference of waves is also similarly in a way particles following geodesics because the waves apear to change direction with no force acting on them.
Photons in a OAM light beam twist as if following geodesics.
Gravity could arise just like the orbital angular momentum does.On the other hand the radiation I have described looks like a graviton beam from QFT.
Firstly, I feel it is important to not look at the attractive side of gravity, but to look at why things don't compress to a complete solid making everything dense.I personally feel that charge stops total compression of matter because charge is opposed to charge. What do you think?
Quote from: Thebox on 05/04/2017 20:13:36Firstly, I feel it is important to not look at the attractive side of gravity, but to look at why things don't compress to a complete solid making everything dense.I personally feel that charge stops total compression of matter because charge is opposed to charge. What do you think?I think you are generally correct. Like you, I feel it is important to look at the repulsive side of gravity. That is the reason that I have come up with the Experimental Quantum Antigravity HYPOTHESIS : https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=70629.0Naturally, there should be both, the attractive, as well as repulsive gravity. The Solar system is a perfect example : QuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com/solar-system/HAVE YOU EVER PONDERED DEEPLY ENOUGH WHY THE SOLAR SYSTEM HAS BEEN SO PERFECTLY STABLE OVER SUCH A LONG TIME?HAVE WE EVER OBSERVED ANY DIRECT OR INDIRECT EFFECTS RESULTING FROM ANY POTENTIAL SOLAR SYSTEM’S INSTABILITIES, LIKE FOR EXAMPLE: PLANETS FALLING ONTO THE SUN; MOONS FALLING ONTO THEIR PLANETS; PLANETS ESCAPING THE SUN; MOONS ESCAPING THEIR PLANETS.IS THIS PERFECT LONG-TERM STABILITY REALLY THE EXCLUSIVE RESULT OF A FRAGILE BALANCE BETWEEN GRAVITATIONAL ATTRACTIONS AND CENTRIPETAL FORCES AMONG THE SUN, THE 8 PLANETS, AND OVER 170 MOONS, NOT INCLUDING PLUTO, ITS 5 MOONS, AND THE PLANET NINE so massive that it tilts the entire Solar system by 6 degrees?COULD THAT HYPOTHESIS OF FRAGILE BALANCE BETWEEN GRAVITATIONAL ATTRACTIONS AND CENTRIPETAL FORCES SOMEHOW BE SUBJECTED TO EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION, OR FALSIFICATION? WHAT WOULD IT TAKE FOR ANY ONE OF THE ABOVE 4 SPECTACULAR INSTABILITIES TO OCCUR IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM?Considering that the age of the Solar system (derived from the study of meteorites which are thought to be the oldest accessible material around) is estimated to be close to 5 billion years, have the angular velocities of all the planets and moons been slowing down? Have they been slowing down at the same rate, or at different rates? In either case, how long will it take before any one of the above 4 spectacular instabilities is going to finally occur? Well, I will not hold by breath, and if none of the above 4 spectacular instabilities had ever happened even once, not to mention that all of them could have happened more than once, then it would follow that the present Solar system stability hypothesis of FRAGILE BALANCE BETWEEN GRAVITATIONAL ATTRACTIONS AND CENTRIPETAL FORCES is correct in small part only. play-roulette-liveNo orbit in the Solar system is perfect, like a spinning roulette, and since chaotic dynamics are pervasive in the Solar system, whatever the reasons of its stability, they cannot be fragile, and in order to be able to compensate for the variety of these chaotic dynamics, they need to be robust enough.QuantumAntiGravity.wordpress.com/solar-system/ “ Scientific discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen, and thinking what nobody else has thought. Scientific discovery must be, by definition, at variance with existing knowledge. During my lifetime, I made two. Both were rejected offhand by the Popes of that field of science.” — Nobel Prize Laureate, 1937