0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
the developers will have to correct the answers.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 21/12/2024 17:01:47 the developers will have to correct the answers.Not possible. The whole point of a chatbot is that it scours cyberspace for anything that looks like information, without human intervention. The quantity of crap increases exponentially as (a) crap begets more crap and (b) crap is not subject to experimental verification and retraction and (c) some crap is compiled by other bots and posted as "research", so the consensus becomes incoherent or just plain wrong.
ChatGPT now can correctly count the number of letter R in the word strawberry.
What's more important is whether the equations accurately represent physical reality.
Quote from: Halc on 21/12/2024 14:26:36what was the point of bringing it all up?To determine if acceleration has any effect on the symmetry breaking in twin paradox, which is the currently most taught explanation.
what was the point of bringing it all up?
Also to see if the travelling twin can be a valid observer
how he views the time dilation experienced by the other twin.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 22/12/2024 01:47:17ChatGPT now can correctly count the number of letter R in the word strawberry.And my dog, about the same age as ChatGPT, can catch rabbits and lick her own arse, without being taught either skill. This obviously qualifies her as a reliable source on all matters, so I asked her opinion on the "square trajectory" question and she agrees with me.
How are you going to know either?
1) you seem to have no knowledge of how to apply the equations2) You seem to be working in complete absence of empirical evidence, the part that represents physical reality.
Einstein reportedly said that he "didn't recognize" his theory of special relativity anymore because of how its interpretations and applications evolved far beyond his original formulation. When he developed the theory in 1905, his focus was on solving specific physical problems, such as reconciling Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism with the principle of relativity.However, as the theory gained widespread acceptance, it became a foundational framework for theoretical physics and was interpreted in ways Einstein had not anticipated, especially in the hands of other physicists. For instance:1. Mathematical Formalism: Mathematicians and physicists like Hermann Minkowski reformulated special relativity in a four-dimensional spacetime framework. While this interpretation became standard, Einstein initially resisted Minkowski's geometrical approach, as it was different from his more intuitive understanding of the theory.2. Quantum Mechanics: Special relativity was later merged with quantum mechanics to form quantum field theory. Einstein, who was skeptical of some aspects of quantum mechanics, may have found this integration to be a departure from his original conception.3. General Adoption and Popularization: The theory became widely accepted and interpreted by the broader scientific community in contexts Einstein hadn't focused on, leading to ideas and discussions he might not have entirely agreed with.Einstein?s statement reflects the natural evolution of scientific theories: once introduced, they often take on lives of their own, shaped by new discoveries, interpretations, and applications.ChatGPT
Now you seem to be claiming that the most common explanation of asymmetrical paths is asymmetrical acceleration. That may be a true thing, but I've never seen a video bothering to point it out.
No extra weight is given to peer reviewed textbooks over say social media posts
Time dilation isn't something anybody experiences, per the first postulate of SR.
Differential aging is an invariant: physical fact, not in any way dependent on coordinate choice or observation.
What does she say?
How do you know that?
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 23/12/2024 07:14:46How do you know that?The most peer-reviewed and authoritative textbook is the Bible, but I don't think ChatGPT thinks the planet is only 6000 years old.
#369: time dilation is a coordinate phenomenon, differential ageing is a real world effect.
One of the most famous paradoxes of all of physics ? who's older? Who's younger? and WHY?This video is about the famous ?Twins paradox? of special relativity, how time can appear to be faster for two different observers at the same time, and which twin really is older (or younger) ? the one who stays on earth or the one who flies in a rocket ship to the stars?
If we are willing to accept this explanation, we are forced to also accept reverse time jump or rewind when the direction of the acceleration is away from the observed twin.
Look at the lines of simultaneity. The video only shows one side of them, i.e. the side where they leave gaps. The other side is where they overlap. This is where the reverse time jump appears in the analysis.
Although it may sound like you'd be looking at something new, I suspect it's just going to be some re-wording of the Andromeda paradox that you're going to end up with.
Apparent forward time jump during the turn around has been used to explain the discrepancy in age observation between stationary twin and travelling twin.Now we show the opposite effect when the observing twin is accelerating away. Although they come from the same mechanism, the reverse time jump is less mentioned in the literature.
"Reverse Time Jump" ---> It sounds like you're describing something amazing, maybe time travel into the past. Of course, that's a feature that SR does not exhibit. So it either isn't that or else it will (probably) be wrong. Quite a few people have looked for ways to travel back into the past and SR doesn't seem to offer that ability. However, you're welcome to try again and it's certainly quite educational to give it a go.