0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Energy "release" in a weakened state.....right?That's the idea Dirac posted, that gravity is that thing that represents that "containment" of energy, that enthalpy.But, the problem there is of course astrophysical theory and how it has allowed itself the idea of an ever-expanding reality without considering gravity as the container of energy, right?A warping of space as gravity suits the idea of enthalpy, but no one in the physics media seems to have wrapped their head around that idea, right?Now, on an astrophysical basis, the idea of "gravitational lensing" takes on new meaning, namely an actual contraction of space between bodies, between mass. The "perception" of the red-shift is actually light being the opposite, the wavelength strung out more the further we see in the distance, as of course enthalpy would be inversely proportional to entropy, right?
Before we get to that idea, first imagine enthalpy and entropy being inversely proportional to one another, right?
If light is entropic care of e/m, and mass enthalpic care of gravity, the theory of the universe changes completely on so many subtle levels it requires a complete reworking of physics.To be honest, I don't think physics was ready for that idea in the time of Dirac, hence the direction that was taken, namely the wonder of e/m while gravity remained a mystery.In defense of physics thought, that was a very logical thing to do, namely develop theories based purely on e/m calculations, trying to include gravity as best as possible without considering gravity could be enthalpic. The idea there is to exhaust all possible ideas along a certain train of theoretical congress. Physics has done that, ad-absurdum when one considers how stupidly vast the task is to understand other potential solar systems based on e/m entropic theory as per the entropic expanding universe idea, right?
Now, without cluttering my last post/answer, I need to post a new idea here."Relativity" is primarily based on the idea of "light", and that's e/m, entropic.Yet Einsteins equation, e=mc^2, is only the entropic equation.The "enthalpic" equation regarding gravity actually could say a lot more about gravitational lensing, and thus the red-shift effect, right, discounting the idea itself of an expanding universe?Now, you were talking about the event horizon of light? If enthalpic gravity has anything to say, the idea of an expanding universe is an illusion of entropic light complicated if not enforced by the inverse entropic gravitaional effect of gravity, "mass" and thus distance being "proportional" to light and not inversely proportional in the enthalic Einstein equation. That means light is "stretched", it's wavelength lengthened, its distance, as a process of gravitational lensing according to the enthalpic idea of gravity, right?It's easy to see why negative energy as an idea didn't run, e/m theory was the kid on the block that had to run its course, right?
So voices will cry about current projects and investments in the face of any new development. Is this a good time globally for that to happen? What do you think?
E/m energy entropy theory could be going to die hard as a theory of everything, right?
The thing is, the only way to prove enthalpic negative energy as gravity is to actually do that thing in a lab, because lets face it, entropy as light, as e/m, has, as a theory, the perceived universe covered, right?
When the lab proof for enthalpic gravity comes, what's the expected reaction? E/m entropy will try to explain it, and for how long?
Does Europe rely on the old?How old is that and what thought that wants them there?Egypt?
The European Science Foundation (ESF) is an association of 8 member organizations devoted to scientific research in 7 European countries. ESF is an independent, non-governmental, non-profit organisation that promotes the highest quality science in Europe. It was established in 1974 and its offices are located in Strasbourg, France (headquarters).ESF Member Organisations are research-performing and research-funding organisations, academies and learned societies across Europe.After 42 years of success in stimulating European research through its networking, ESF undertook a re-alignment and re-calibration of its strategic vision and focus. The launch of its Expert division “Science Connect” beginning of 2017 marks the next phase of its evolution and has been born out of a deep understanding of the science landscape, funding context and the needs of the research community.More information about the new role of ESF and SCIENCE CONNECT can be found on www.esf.org
If I had to rely on anything as a nation, it would be the people.More to that, a structure pointed to the stars.....and of course the sun.Why get lost in anything else?
What's old yet what becomes new is what and why?It's not like doing the 50's or 80's, right?
Maybe so, maybe you need a fresh approach,somebody who understands the point.
Point A to point B, in space, quickly?
My fault, we got off topic again.I think we still need to address what happened to the idea of "negative energy", how bodies, mass, two bodies, speed up towards each other they develop kinetic energy, thus requiring gravity to be "enthalpic". Remember, mass is not gravity, as much as an electron is not electromagnetism...….the electron is related to electromagnetism, they are not one and the same though, as much as mass is not gravity, right?
To you it did, I can't argue that. "But" the idea of "enterprise" with others is knowing how to reach that persons relayed idea.I mean, when I said, "why can't we embrace fast technology" or words to that effect, I was merely hushing the idea of giving science a kick in the proverbial with new innovative theory that "actually works" and is "fundamentally based".