Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: MichaelMD on 15/02/2019 10:22:38

Title: Does This Ether Model Best Explain Quantum Gravity?
Post by: MichaelMD on 15/02/2019 10:22:38
The basic idea of my ether model is that there exists a universal ether-matrix, composed of identical elemental ether units which interact (resonate) via vibratory contact, and all the quantum forces we observe are underpinned by these more-primary ether forces. The underlying etheric forces form the basis of all transmissions, via different kinds (differentially-resonant) of vibrational patterns, such as electricity, light, and gravitation, patterns which form in the ether matrix, as the ether units in the matrix vibrate.

This Model views quantum units, such as photons, not as solid particles, but as "particle capacity" units made up of the aforemenioned elemental ether units. Photons are generated all along the path of a transmission, such as light, by being built up from the universal elemental ether units. -When a source of light energy exists, the etheric units in the area begin to align, entrain, and form other ether linkages, which produces larger units. -Photons, of course, are what our atomically-structured eyes require for vision, but the primary underlying forces of the transmission are etheric.

This ether model is based on the idea that in the very beginning, the first "happening" was not a "Big Bang," but instead, a universal oscillation, which transitioned to a universal vibratory ether, after a "Yin-Yang" pairing of oscillating elemental units reverted to singleton units, breaking the symmetry of oscillation, and converting the oscillations to a universal vibrational ether

In the case of gravity, the way this Model would view it is that there exists a "continuum" of elemental ether units both inside and outside solid bodies. When a pair of bodies are being gravitationally attracted, there exists a very sharp cut-off of the electromagnetic forces from the inside of the bodies toward the outside, but because of the universal continuum of elemental ether units, there still occurs a slight degree of transfer of the energy forces inside across the outside of the bodies into the "auric" space between them. -This produces an increase in the buildup of energy among the spatial ether forces there, which in turn causes an increase in the build-up of quantum forces in that space. In other words, the space between the two bodies becomes slightly more "quantized." -Looked at from the perspective of the ether, the ether has become more "tightened up," and contracts, compared to the other areas of space around the bodies.

This is how my ether model would explain quantum gravity.
Title: Re: Does This Ether Model Best Explain Quantum Gravity?
Post by: MichaelMD on 16/02/2019 12:56:02
To add one key detail of my Model that I left out in describing it above. - The underlying ether forces that I claim instigate those quantum transmissions would be perfectly linear, inasmuch as they interact via direct vibratory contact between identical elemental energy units, which makes them ideal for the purpose of transmitting those forms of energy. (Quantum forces, on the other hand, operate via non-linear mechanisms, like waves, fields, spin, and distance-vectors.) Of course, the quantum units, such as photons, have important effects in our world, but we should realize that something else is  involved, beneath all that. 
Title: Re: Does This Ether Model Best Explain Quantum Gravity?
Post by: yor_on on 28/02/2019 00:35:35
* The underlying ether forces that I claim instigate those quantum transmissions would be perfectly linear, inasmuch as they interact via direct vibratory contact between identical elemental energy units, which makes them ideal for the purpose of transmitting those forms of energy "

No
Title: Re: Does This Ether Model Best Explain Quantum Gravity?
Post by: MichaelMD on 01/03/2019 12:50:30
I reiterate my Ether Model is the best explanation for the unanswered questions in quantum theory. -Certainly this model, of a dynamic system that underlies quantum systems, and operates via direct vibratory contact between identical  elemental energy units, is the best available model to explain quantum entanglement.
Title: Re: Does This Ether Model Best Explain Quantum Gravity?
Post by: yor_on on 02/03/2019 01:08:27

I'm sorry but  to think of the universe as a 'linear system' just don't work. You might want to think of it, as I do, as something in where 'linearity' is 'weaved' inside non linearity. It's chaos mathematics but what non linearity has that linearity doesn't is a 'infinity'.
Title: Re: Does This Ether Model Best Explain Quantum Gravity?
Post by: MichaelMD on 02/03/2019 14:35:13
My Ether Model is based on a wider-ranging view of how our quantum world came about. In my overall model, the very first "happening" was not a Big Bang, but rather a universal reciprocal oscillation of point-localities. The universal substrate for that was original space, which differed from space as it is now, and is viewed as having been self-compatible so that it oscillated. Then oscillatory fatigue of neighboring "pojnts" produced Yin-Yang point-pairs. Such pairs would have had to reversibly revert to singleton units, which would have broken the symmetry of oscillation, converting the universal oscillations to a universal vibration, an ether matrix composed of independently-vibrating elemental, identical, ether units.

This would have been an unstructured "ether world," or ether macrocosm, in which intense fluxes of ultra-rarified ether forces produced energic foci of forces we can't envision from our present world of quantum forces. Unimaginable energic reactions went on, and eventually a sapient entity arose. Then there was produced quantum-atomic structured "island(s)," but the quantum-atomic structure of the island(s) was undermined by the over-riding ether macrocosm.  Then it was decided to use the rarified ether forces to produce a more-stable quantum/atomic macrocosm (our present world.) The way this was done was by projecting electron(s) from a quantum-atomic island toward a "virgin" ether region, which would quantize the entire region, chain-reactionally/.
Title: Re: Does This Ether Model Best Explain Quantum Gravity?
Post by: MichaelMD on 20/05/2019 12:57:44
Presenting a new model of gravitational attraction should include how it treats magnetic attraction. My Model would view both kinds of attraction as involving the same basic ether forces, the apparent differences between them involving a purely-qualitative effect that results  from their different kinds of etheric vibratory patterns.

To appreciate how this effect works, it would help to consider how my Model treats quantum entanglement (Q.E.) -It views QE as representing a connection, in the ether matrix, between two closely-related quantum units, resulting from radiated packets of ether energy having the same vibratory pattern. -The elemental ether units making up the matrix form a linear connection, via their vibrations, which interacts with the elemental ether units that constitute the elemental "building blocks" of the two closely-related quantum units.

In the model of gravitational attraction above, elemental ether units, from the energized interiors of two bodies, enter the space between the bodies via a universal elemental-ether-unit-continuum. This energizes the space between the bodies, quantizing it and contracting the ether there, drawing the two bodies toward each other. -But it's important to note that in gravitation, the two bodies don't have any particular similarity  in the patterns of their etheric vibrations. Thus, gravitational attraction (compared to magnetic attraction) is weaker and more diffusely spread-out, whereas in the magnetic attraction between two bodies that are closely related, and similar in their etheric vibratory patterns will be attracted in a stronger, more dramatic, way. -But the basic etheric process is similar in both cases, involving built-up etheroidal and quantized energy units, associated with contraction of the elemental portion of the ether between two bodies being attracted.
Title: Re: Does This Ether Model Best Explain Quantum Gravity?
Post by: MichaelMD on 21/05/2019 14:19:57
The final sentence above should have included one additional detail. -The reason the ether contracts in the space between two attracted bodies is that, after the energy in the space increases, and the elemental ,ether units align and entrain, forming the larger built-up units that quantize the space, is that the elemental units are being converted from a free state to a state in which they connect up with other elemental building-block units forming the larger energy units. -Since the elemental units when in their free state require tiny "empty" space between them to allow for vibration, those tiny spaces are erased during the quantization. That is what contracts the ether.between the bodies.