I wish to know who it was that invented the dildo?I believe it was invented by a thoughtful husband named Mr Richard Head.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Let's make explicit what assumptions we have to make in making that statement above.I think altruistic actions are important and one should always accommodate kindness and support others. The problem arises when supporting others outside of our own family create less than your expectations for your own loved ones this statement supports the old saying family comes first. Charity is possible by means of surplus and available time, money and goods.
Whose lives should we try to preserve? Is it our own self as individual? What do you think about altruistic behaviors?
Is there something more important than your own life?
Why sustaining lives is considered as good thing?
Watch out for a new movie "Eating ourselves to extinction" released this week in cinemas. My original article in Physics World (July 2005) set out the calculations.Thanks, Alan I will watch that movie when it comes to Australia and you are correct about animals not being green. If we could harness their gas things would be different but I can't see how that is possible.
Incidentally the annual quiescent CO2 emission of a horse is about the same as a small car travelling 8000 miles. Animals are not green!
How would you prioritize them? What's the justification for sacrificing one thing over the others?The things that matter are the important things that we must prioritise. The most important things are the needs we have to sustain our lives food before alcohol clothing before sigerattes rent before holidays tools before toys. Common sense must be in place ahead of fun and games.
How would you decide which thing is more important than others?We must prioritise and coordinate all the things that matter.
Does anyone know a flat earther who would like a flight to the edge? Happy to share costs. Eastward from the UK is preferable for me - saves renting a life raft.Give them a shovel and they can discover the other side.
Didn't know. How can U tell? Why was s/he banned?He or she? for talking too much rubbish and posting inappropriate images.
There are probably people that actually believe the moon landing was faked, but it's really hard to actually bend your beliefs into the flat Earth thing.I think the best way to prove to a flater that the earth is as we know it is just to look at any of the lunar eclipses they all reveal a globe shadow from all angles at all times. The problem is you can never convince a fool.
The well lit single atom, and the distant star are both diffraction limited dots.I think I understand what your saying a star five light years away is like a golf ball at the distance of the moon we can never see the golf ball at that distance but if it was as hot as a star we will see its light. That is its diffracted and distorted light.
The image you would see would be the limits of your eye rather than anything to do with the object.
Unless the hole is also frictionless, you need to drill it from pole to pole.Yes, I forgot about the earth rotation that would be like the Coriolis effect. I think?
Otherwise the thing hits the sides.
Here's my little bit, too, JT:Thanks for that CC. yes we can get lift in many ways these days the fighter jet planes are more like rockets the way that they can fly. You make some interesting points regarding wing shape and the main reason for a plane with conventional wing design being able to fly inverted as you pointed out it is done by increst angle of attack and adequate engine power just don't forget that your elevator control is also reversed when inverted.
They say that if U drilled a hole all the way thru the centre of theI believe that if we had a hole all the way through the earth and it was straight through the centre and the hole was sealed and void of any atmosphere/ vacuum the object would theoretically go back and forth forever each time reaching the surface. It would get from one side of the earth to the other very fast as a result of the vacuum zero friction.
Earth and dropped a weight/mass into it, then ignoring any friction,
like air resistance or rubbing against the side/s, that it would fall
right thru, in 42 minutes, and then oscillate, back and forth. They say
it would still take 42 min even if U missed the centre.
or they are just thick,I think so I can't understand how anyone can come to the conclusion that the earth is flat. They bother me just like the people that don't believe we went to the moon. It gives us something to laugh at.
Yes you have; you just didn't realise it.Will it work or is it a fail.
Firstly, what do you mean by moving away from us at 10% the speed of light?If light speed is one billion miles per hour the ten % of that one hundred million miles per hour. Thanks for your second post it's a lot to get my head around. When referring to the curvature of space I fail to understand. If we look at a galaxy that is one billion light years away we see the light as it was one billion years ago the galaxy is most likely in reality not in the location that we are seeing it in now it may be many degrees in any direction away from what we are seeing now. Is this related to the curviture of space or is it not related at all.
Energy is.How is energy lost as a result of redshift?
What we really sacrifice are other things that we could have done but we must abandon or postpone because of the things that we are doing.We need to shift all of our time to the important things that make the sacrifices worthwhile.
I haven't found something like this being demonstrated in an experiment.I haven't seen this either it might be interesting to find out.