The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. Question of the Week
  4. QotW - 11.01.16 - How does the brain process Braille?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

QotW - 11.01.16 - How does the brain process Braille?

  • 3 Replies
  • 8486 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 19 times
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.01.16 - How does the brain process Braille?
« on: 24/01/2011 13:34:06 »
How does the brain process Braille? Is it the same as text?
Asked by Frederik Creemers


                                       

                                          Find out more on our podcast page

                                       

[chapter podcast=2986 track=11.01.16/Naked_Scientists_Show_11.01.16_7777.mp3]  or Listen to the Answer[/chapter] or [download as MP3]

« Last Edit: 24/01/2011 13:34:06 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 19 times
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.01.16 - How does the brain process Braille?
« Reply #1 on: 24/01/2011 13:34:06 »
We put this question to Dan Goldreich, associate professor in the Department of  Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour at McMaster University in  Ontario, Canada...
Dan: -  So, to answer your question, we need to understand how the brain processes both touch and language. With respect to touch, when we  move our fingertip over objects such as Braille characters, receptors under the skin produce electrical impulses that race at about 50 meters per second through the nervous system and up towards the  brain.  This pattern of electrical impulses, a sort of neural Morse code, activates a part of the brain's parietal lobe - roughly halfway  between the forehead and the back of the head.  This tactile area of  the parietal lobe helps to decode the neural impulses, in order to  infer the shapes of the objects that touched the skin.
[img float=right]/forum/copies/RTEmagicC_DSC_4050-MR-Braille_1.jpg.jpg[/img]Now, interestingly, in blind people, particularly those blind from birth, touch activates not only this tactile area of the parietal lobe, but also a part of the occipital lobe, in the very back of the head, that is normally reserved for vision. A blind person reading  Braille, then, will experience activation of both the tactile area of the brain and the normally visual area of the brain. This unusually extensive brain activation may underlie the heightened sense of touch in blind people.
However, in reading Braille, the brain must not only perceive the  shapes of the characters, but once it has done so it must understand those shapes as language. This linguistic understanding is probably not occurring in the brain areas I've just mentioned, but rather in the brain's language areas (such as the area of the temporal lobe -  above the ear - called Wernicke's area). So a blind person reading Braille is probably using the same language areas of the brain as a  sighted person would while reading print, and as you are right now as you understand the words that I'm speaking.
So, "Does the mind process text in a different way when reading Braille?" the answer to the question is both yes and no. 
Blind people reading Braille do show an unusually extensive pattern of brain activation but, once the brain perceives the tactile shapes, the subsequently activated brain language areas used to understand the Braille words are probably the same as those used to understand printed or spoken words.

*Finger size can also affect tactile acuity:
Journal of Neuroscience Dec., 2009: Peters RM, Hackeman E, Goldreich D (2009) Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex
difference in tactile spatial acuity. J Neurosci 29: 15756 –15761.
« Last Edit: 24/01/2011 13:34:06 by _system »
Logged
 

Offline TheSecretary

  • First timers
  • *
  • 9
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.01.16 - How does the brain process Braille?
« Reply #2 on: 17/01/2011 16:37:08 »
We had a wonderful answer from a listener:

"Having read print normally until age 17 I had an excellent memory for the
spelling of words and very rarely had to look at a word twice.

"I lost my sight completely and learned braille in a few weeks, although I am
far from a fluent reader.   What is interesting is that I am now very poor at
spelling and even though I go over a word many times it simply does not stick
in the memory bank.

"As an extra dimension to your listener's question, I am synaesthetic , such
that words and letters appear in colour, and this was very helpful when it came
to anatomy in my physio course.   When, for example, I had to describe
trapezius  , I would see this in my head as an orange area on the
shoulder/neck/head and simply  describe the picture.   I found that even after
forty years of blindness, that this memory is still very strong.

"Therefore, I infer, that my reading of braille is not decoded in the area where
my print memories  are stored, but my memory for letter and word colour coding
was unaffected by my sight loss."

Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6465
  • Activity:
    30%
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
QotW - 11.01.16 - How does the brain process Braille?
« Reply #3 on: 18/01/2011 00:32:42 »
Thank You.

I have studied a second language, and have been aware of subtle differences between the two, especially in retrieval of certain memories.  It sounds like learning two different types of reading may be similar. 

I hadn't expected an explanation of sensing the Braille in colors.  Now, I'm left wondering if the explanation is the same for those individuals who have never seen colors.  Or, perhaps it is impossible to actually attribute words to the sensations.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

QotW - 15.08.24 - Why do major keys sound happy and minor keys sound mournful?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 47342
Last post 05/04/2018 03:06:55
by Monox D. I-Fly
QotW - 08.04.06 - Better to drink wine than to drink nothing?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 33
Views: 109646
Last post 17/01/2021 17:52:40
by LaurenaS
QotW - 18.08.02 - Why are non-stick pans non-stick?

Started by Adam MurphyBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 6
Views: 42394
Last post 18/01/2020 06:33:19
by evan_au
QotW - 10.03.28 - Is a human bite worse than a dog bite?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 52990
Last post 13/01/2019 09:40:37
by chris
QotW - 11.03.06 - How do pain medications target pain?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 7
Views: 16038
Last post 18/01/2018 21:08:11
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.14 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.