61
New Theories / Re: Can this be true description of black hole
« on: 23/03/2019 21:09:41 »Light is a photon. A magnetic field is due to the photaeno outer half of a photon.That would be a great idea- on a creative writing site, rather than a science one.I have to admit that I'm easily entertained. But back to the original topic, I'd also like to point out that light is not attracted to magnetic fields and as such a magnetic object like the one mentioned would not be black for that reason.
Photons annihilate aether & hencely have mass (or quasi mass if u like)(there possibly being a difference tween the action of mass propagating at c kmps versus static mass). Here i am talking about the inner half of the photon.
Likewise photaenos (the outer half of a photon) probly annihilate mass, in which case they too have mass (in which case the photon has a combined mass, but this might be moreso a combination of two different classes of mass if the photaeno annihilation is peculiar, which it probly is).
Anything with mass must attract everything else having mass, hencely photons attract photons, & em radiation attracts photons. But this is a silly useless law, because every quantum thing has mass.
I agree that a magnetic field is itself invisible to the eye. But i dont agree that a magnetic field doesnt attract light.
And i dont follow the logic then leading to the statement that a magnetic object would not be black. This probly follows from the idea that magnetism cant of itself create a black hole. But as i have here pointed out, magnetism has mass, & if it were possible to bottle magnetism up into a small enough & massive enough blob then it could give us a black hole. But that kind of thinking aint needed, because magnetism needs matter (eg electrons quarks etc), ie if u have lots of magnetism then u must have lots of matter.