1
General Science / How is the science of captive marine biology affecting natural coral reefs?
« on: 21/11/2009 15:48:08 »
Thanks for your response I can tell you have given the matter thought, now this is where I like it. You guys aren't exactly welcoming so don't act like I showed up all trolling or disrespectful or unwelcoming of new ideas or anything don't quit your day jobs to be ambassadors for your site lol jj don't get all mad. From what I read above, I typed very civilly, and from exact experience with decent grammar and scientific backround, hence my visit to a science forum...
The point is that when you can remove all the challenge of growing corals on a large scale, ie by making them cost 200 to setup fully stocked, perhaps you can quadruple the current inland bioloading of corals, to reseed real reefs after natural or man made bleaching events. That is a potential positive effect of this kind of study, only because your guess lacked any
Another *positive effect of the studies I showed above is that when you turn on 20 million people to coral reefkeeping in a way so simple it makes pure skeptics out of those who haven't asked any questions, you can have faster innovation because it's in the hands of people who don't have to be part of the exclusive guild of marine aquarists/technicians any longer...anyone can run these off a two page instruction sheet. There is some direct science behind that assertion, rather than saying Im lying how about we just trade knowledge man you might catch a few ideas off these and I may catch a few from your knowledge of captive marine science.
Right now, coral production is exclusive to large venues but it is gaining popularity in the home environment. These reefs are no more unstable than a 180 gallon tank, if we could continue to duel a little biology back and forth about the matter we'll that'd be what I showed up for. Nice to meet you all I figured I'd meet some good guys who can challenge some new idea you are ok in my book.
The point is that when you can remove all the challenge of growing corals on a large scale, ie by making them cost 200 to setup fully stocked, perhaps you can quadruple the current inland bioloading of corals, to reseed real reefs after natural or man made bleaching events. That is a potential positive effect of this kind of study, only because your guess lacked any
Another *positive effect of the studies I showed above is that when you turn on 20 million people to coral reefkeeping in a way so simple it makes pure skeptics out of those who haven't asked any questions, you can have faster innovation because it's in the hands of people who don't have to be part of the exclusive guild of marine aquarists/technicians any longer...anyone can run these off a two page instruction sheet. There is some direct science behind that assertion, rather than saying Im lying how about we just trade knowledge man you might catch a few ideas off these and I may catch a few from your knowledge of captive marine science.
Right now, coral production is exclusive to large venues but it is gaining popularity in the home environment. These reefs are no more unstable than a 180 gallon tank, if we could continue to duel a little biology back and forth about the matter we'll that'd be what I showed up for. Nice to meet you all I figured I'd meet some good guys who can challenge some new idea you are ok in my book.