The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
UNRUH EFFECT -- does Crothers disprove it?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
UNRUH EFFECT -- does Crothers disprove it?
0 Replies
1450 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
mad aetherist
(OP)
Hero Member
791
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 16 times
Naked Science Forum Newbie
UNRUH EFFECT -- does Crothers disprove it?
«
on:
13/11/2018 02:50:47 »
Crothers & Robitaille show that the Unruh Effect is rubbish.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1811.0157v1.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1Wij5SjBcUJDTWZ74RJQWyRIAd-cI2Y-_D8EdInVxBxgE7d9kI1iNz1mo
THE UNRUH EFFECT -- According to this theoretical effect:
“From the point of view of an accelerating observer or detector, empty space contains a gas of particles at
a temperature proportional to the acceleration”
The Unruh Effect is another Einsteinian invention -- probly arising from GR (dunno). Fancy saying that an accelerating observer sees that empty space has a blackbody radiation. Is there no limit to what an Einsteinian can justify or invent.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...