The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Negative position and negative velocity graphs
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Negative position and negative velocity graphs

  • 4 Replies
  • 5152 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alinta (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 14
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Negative position and negative velocity graphs
« on: 28/09/2012 07:11:09 »
Hi, it's me with the beginners questions again,

I've been looking at graphs that show 'free fall' as a negative position or velocity, and therefore they look upside down on the graph (simple position vs. time and velocity vs. time graphs). Why is it that the downwards pull of gravity is always seen as a negative velocity? Or is this just the particular examples that I have found? Is this only in cases where the free falling thing has been thrown upwards to begin with, and therefore is returning to it's original position?

Because I am interested in how these things affect the human body, I am imagining a person standing, and then slipping over, or free falling to the ground from the distance of their own height - because this is downwards, is it still seen as a 'negative' despite their original position being upright? Or is it impossible to use this as an example?

Thanks,
Alinta
Logged
 



Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 44324
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 99 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Negative position and negative velocity graphs
« Reply #1 on: 28/09/2012 09:10:13 »
hmm?

take a look here for the convention Convention for Direction in Gravity Equations. does it really state that free fall is a negative? To me a free fall would be equivalent to being 'at rest' locally, neither negative nor positive. Although comparing you may get a different answer, defining your 'system'.
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline Alinta (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 14
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Negative position and negative velocity graphs
« Reply #2 on: 28/09/2012 10:02:36 »
Ah thanks yor_on, I think your link's explanation of "Velocities in the same direction as gravity are positive and velocities in the opposite direction are negative vectors." probably sums it up.

These were the graphs I was looking at http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/1DKin/U1L5c.cfm [nofollow], which only seem to show negative directions, which may have confused me?
Logged
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 44324
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 99 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Negative position and negative velocity graphs
« Reply #3 on: 28/09/2012 10:27:05 »
Take a look at this one too. What is slope? And I definitely agree :) It's somewhat confusing.
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10231
  • Activity:
    36%
  • Thanked: 1227 times
    • View Profile
Re: Negative position and negative velocity graphs
« Reply #4 on: 28/09/2012 11:04:15 »
When talking about projectile motion (cannons, balls, rockets, etc), you are often interested in the height that the projectile reaches; "Up" = Positive.

Against this is gravity, always dragging you down. "Down" = Negative.

If you roll a ball off a cliff (instead of throwing it off the cliff), and take the top of the cliff as the zero point, then the height is only negative.
If the zero is taken at the bottom of the cliff, then the height starts off positive.
It all comes down to the convention you adopt...
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is relativistic velocity what gives mass mass?

Started by MikeSBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 13
Views: 7365
Last post 06/10/2011 04:17:48
by yor_on
Is there an escape velocity to escape the/a solar system?

Started by Pseudoscience-is-malarkeyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 5098
Last post 04/10/2016 10:44:26
by evan_au
Why does double the velocity double the momentum and quadruple the KE?

Started by Curious CatBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 65
Views: 5734
Last post 15/10/2021 09:08:19
by Colin2B
What does theory predict for the average velocity of a single atom in a black hole?

Started by John Burnap Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 3725
Last post 06/02/2011 21:30:03
by John Burnap
Does Distance Reduction Of Rindler Horizon Follow The Velocity Addition Formula?

Started by A-walBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 20
Views: 10951
Last post 13/04/2020 01:50:42
by Janus
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.101 seconds with 43 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.