The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Dimensional
  3. Show Posts
  4. Topics
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Topics - Dimensional

Pages: [1]
1
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How does special relativity explain dimensional components ...
« on: 24/06/2022 23:28:58 »
of space and time of a moving observer and a observer at rest?  So if object A observes object B coming towards it very fast, A is at rest and should only have the time component and no spacelike component.  But B can say the same thing.  How does SR explain the componentry of this kind of scenario?

2
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is this a paradox in general relativity?
« on: 14/05/2022 06:08:03 »
I hope I can get some help here.  I can't figure out how this simple thought experiment is incorrect.

According to a pretty good looking analysis of length contraction and time dilation, the author makes a diagram of a spaceship travelling very fast towards the right side of your screen.  At the higher of the 3 clocks/events is the nose of the ship according to an observer on the ground and so is the clock/event below it.  For the diagram, here is the link, and just watch from 6:30 to 7:00
.

Now my thought experiment is about what might happen if an object moves really fast in front of the nose of the ship where the lower clock/event is.  To make the object appear in front of the nose almost instantaneously, we will say that it came from another spatial dimension z going into your screen.  For simplicity sake, let's say this interaction happens at the lower clock/event (where the nose of the ship is).

If an interception between the contracted nose (the lower clock) and the object is possible in the scenario given, it would seem that there would be an interaction with the nose of the ship that will never happen with the nose of the ship in the future (the higher clock).


3
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Why are large astronomical and relatively dense objects
« on: 26/01/2022 18:06:52 »
usually spherical when in a rest frame?

Isn't this a coincidence since relativity says that structures like the moon also exist as disk-like shapes to sufficiently fast frames of reference?

In other words, why do large spherical objects seem to favor rest frames?

4
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is this a correct spacetime diagram with world lines?
« on: 20/01/2022 20:03:45 »
The diagram has 3 objects in it with 3 world lines in yellow.  There is a rock traveling really fast through the origin in the primed frame.  There are 2 more rocks at rest in the unprimed frame.  I also put the rocks on the x' axis just to remind me what is happening in the frame of reference of the rock that is traveling.  Is all of this roughly correct?

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.