The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. What if the universe really is infinite?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

What if the universe really is infinite?

  • 41 Replies
  • 5830 Views
  • 5 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online geordief (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 524
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 35 times
    • View Profile
What if the universe really is infinite?
« on: 18/10/2021 13:02:08 »
Watching a Horizon programme last night on BBC 4 (Sean Caroll was one of the contributers)

Apparently the Cosmic Microwave Background Map is like an expanding bubble around anywhere in our "neighbourhood" and its features have now been mapped in enough detail to "draw" a huge triangle from here to there.

The triangle ,according to the programme is evidence that  space (spacetime?) is probably flat and as a result the universe outside the observable part is  of infinite extent.

What might be the implications if this,startlingly  is true and can we now posit this provisional result as a stone to build our edifice of how "everything" works.

Can we ditch the "universe may be finite" for good unless we get  some new unexpected observations in the coming years or centuries?
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14824
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1120 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #1 on: 18/10/2021 13:29:44 »
The observable part of the universe is obviously finite if it is expanding, but it would be absurd to state that there is no unobservable volume outside, or to assert that the unobservable volume is also finite.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, Curious Cat

Online geordief (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 524
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 35 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #2 on: 18/10/2021 13:47:58 »
But can we begin to tentatively assume that the observable universe may well  be part of an (dynamic) infinite structure?

Rather than hedging our bets as it were,can we just let it sink in to our "world view" that this ,or something very similar can be the starting block  that all our other ideas and theories have to accord with?

A bit like Einstein and the invariance of the speed of light.Just accept it and build around it.

It makes me wonder where the energy "came from" to keep "all this" going.

Is it related to asymmetry?
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2255
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 612 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #3 on: 18/10/2021 16:54:58 »
Quote from: geordief on 18/10/2021 13:47:58
But can we begin to tentatively assume that the observable universe may well  be part of an (dynamic) infinite structure?
That (the infinite part) has pretty much been the assumption all along, and all this latest finding only shows that it is flat to more zeros than had previously been measured. Any positively curved space would imply a finite volume just like Earth's surface is positively curved and thus has finite area despite the limited extent of the visible part of it. There's no edge. You can travel indefinitely and never get to a boundary, and yet the area is finite.

So while the assumption has always been an infinite universe, they've never really been able to put sufficient nails in the finite-volume model. This is just one more nail in that coffin. The finite models don't explain anything better than the infinite models.

I don't know what you mean by dynamic. Yes, the state at a given time is different than a state at a different time, but the 'state' isn't the structure, the latter being the whole of spacetime with time as part of the structure, so the structure itself isn't something that changes, and is thus questionably describable as 'dynamic'.
« Last Edit: 08/06/2022 02:29:40 by Halc »
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, Curious Cat

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7258
  • Activity:
    17.5%
  • Thanked: 407 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #4 on: 18/10/2021 20:43:44 »
The implications of an infinite universe are pretty startling, actually. When you have an infinite amount of matter and energy with a relatively random distribution throughout space, then every possible scenario will have happened an infinite number of times in the past (so long as the scenario doesn't require longer than the current age of the Universe to occur) and will continue to happen an infinite number of times in the future.

Anything you can imagine that doesn't violate the laws of physics (except the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which is a statistical law) would happen. There would be a planet out there somewhere where random organic molecules in a pond spontaneously joined together to form a perfect copy of Michael Jackson, including all of his memories. There would be a planet populated entirely by clones that look exactly like you. There would be Boltzmann brains that formed spontaneously from clouds of gas in space that are haunted by false memories of having been tortured for hundreds of years on end.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, Curious Cat



Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2255
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 612 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #5 on: 18/10/2021 20:55:25 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 18/10/2021 20:43:44
The implications of an infinite universe are pretty startling, actually. When you have an infinite amount of matter and energy with a relatively random distribution throughout space, then every possible scenario will have happened an infinite number of times in the past (so long as the scenario doesn't require longer than the current age of the Universe to occur) and will continue to happen an infinite number of times in the future.
I must disagree. The current state of Earth can have only happened now and not in the past or later. Given an infinite universe (and a couple more assumptions, notably that the universe is in fact everywhere in some state, a premise which I find implausible), then Earth does indeed occur at an infinite number of places, but not at different times since the age of the universe is part of the current state of Earth. There can never be one like it again, because in the future the universe (visible from this hypothetical future Earth) will be in a state of higher entropy than can be measured from this future Earth.

OK, you mention Boltzmann brains, so I suppose a Boltzmann-Earth could exist that would momentarily be in a false state of having just measured a very different universe than the real one out there.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Online geordief (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 524
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 35 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #6 on: 18/10/2021 21:21:29 »
@Kryptid I see it the other way round.For there to be an identical system to another it has to have identical connections to its environment.

Taken to the extreme that would mean that system A would be a part of an identical universe (including its past ,since the universe is dynamic)  to that of system B.

So system A =system B
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7258
  • Activity:
    17.5%
  • Thanked: 407 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #7 on: 18/10/2021 21:29:22 »
Quote from: Halc on 18/10/2021 20:55:25
then Earth does indeed occur at an infinite number of places, but not at different times since the age of the universe is part of the current state of Earth.

I'm not sure I fully understand your reply. Are you saying there is some reason that there cannot be a planet out there somewhere that is identical down to the subatomic level to the way the Earth was 60 million years ago?

Quote from: geordief on 18/10/2021 21:21:29
@Kryptid I see it the other way round.For there to be an identical system to another it has to have identical connections to its environment.

I'm obviously talking about something being identical to within a particular volume.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Online geordief (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 524
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 35 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #8 on: 18/10/2021 21:33:23 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 18/10/2021 21:29:22
I'm obviously talking about something being identical to within a particular volume
But isolated systems don't exist.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat



Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2255
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 612 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #9 on: 18/10/2021 21:53:06 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 18/10/2021 21:29:22
I'm not sure I fully understand your reply. Are you saying there is some reason that there cannot be a planet out there somewhere that is identical down to the subatomic level to the way the Earth was 60 million years ago?
Yes, it can exist, but only 60 million years ago as measured by cosmological time. It can't exist 'now' relative to that coordinate system, and no other <reasonable> coordinate system reaches that far away, but I suppose you could do a custom ad-hoc foliation of spacetime that just asserts that this remote dino-laden Earth happens to be simultaneous with 2021 here.

This again assumes that the universe has a state, unmeasured.

Quote from: geordief on 18/10/2021 21:21:29
I see it the other way round.For there to be an identical system to another it has to have identical connections to its environment.
There are connections only to the volume's past light cone, so an identical Earth only needs to have identical past with ours, which reaches out at best less than 6 billion LY out. No event in our causal past has ever been further away from 'here' than that, so only the state within that light cone matters, not the whole state of the observable universe, the vast majority of which is not in our current causal past and not even in the causal past of any possible future state of Earth for that matter. It's not what they mean by 'observable universe'.
« Last Edit: 18/10/2021 21:56:01 by Halc »
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7258
  • Activity:
    17.5%
  • Thanked: 407 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #10 on: 19/10/2021 03:59:13 »
Quote from: geordief on 18/10/2021 21:33:23
But isolated systems don't exist.

I never said otherwise.

Quote from: Halc on 18/10/2021 21:53:06
and no other <reasonable> coordinate system reaches that far away

I'm admittedly confused as to why you say this. There is a limited distance for coordination systems?

Quote from: Halc on 18/10/2021 21:53:06
This again assumes that the universe has a state, unmeasured.

Would not the living things on that hypothetical, far away planet count as doing measurements by making observations? Or are we entering "Wigner's friend" territory?
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2255
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 612 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #11 on: 19/10/2021 13:14:14 »
Quote from: geordief on 18/10/2021 13:02:08
The triangle ,according to the programme is evidence that  space (spacetime?) is probably flat
Space is flat, not spacetime, as I go into below (bold)
Quote from: Kryptid on 19/10/2021 03:59:13
Quote from: Halc on 18/10/2021 21:53:06
and no other <reasonable> coordinate system reaches that far away
I'm admittedly confused as to why you say this. There is a limited distance for coordination systems?
Inertial coordinate systems, or 'coordinate space' (adjusted for local wiggles for local masses) for instance require (at the largest scales at least) flat Minkowskian spacetime. Space may be flat but spacetime certainly isn't. Such coordinates are subtlety dropped for cosmological coordinates in any situation where the two differ significantly, which is over several billion light years. So for instance, consider visible galaxy X. In cosmological coordinates, the time there is currently 13.8 BY (same as it is anywhere), it is 16.5 BLY away, receding at a rapidity of 1.2c, and the light from that event will never get here because it's somewhat outside the event horizon. Same object in the inertial frame of Earth: The time there is about 8.3 BY. It is about 11.4 BLY away, receding at a velocity of about .83c, and the light from that event should get here in 11.4 billion years, but it won't so that's a contradiction. The coordinate system doesn't work at that scale.

In a theoretical zero-energy solution to the FLRW model, spacetime does become Minkowskian and one can apply inertial coordinates to the entire universe, but the current size then would not be infinite, but rather frame dependent, having a current diameter of 27.6 BLY in in the frame of Earth. A finite size would mean that it indeed has an edge. Anyway, this FLRW solution doesn't match empirical observations.

So that leaves what I called 'ad-hoc' coordinate systems where axes might not be orthogonal and other oddities that prevent the same arithmetic from being used in any direction. One can just assign arbitrary times to all the events of the universe and make the distant dino-laden Earth have the same time coordinate as us.

Quote from: Halc on 18/10/2021 21:53:06
This again assumes that the universe has a state, unmeasured.
Would not the living things on that hypothetical, far away planet count as doing measurements by making observations? Or are we entering "Wigner's friend" territory?[/quote]
Yes, positing that living things have anything to do with it is the Wigner interpretation, which even Wigner himself abandoned since it was shown that solipsism follows from its premises.

Rovelli showed that no system can measure itself, and thus the cat in the box cannot collapse its own wave function any more that can the poison bottle when it obviously measures the result of the radioactive decay detector. These things are still in a state of superposition relative to anything outside the box, and thus the distant Earth is in superposition of being-there/not-being-there relative to here, as is every event sufficiently distant. Similarly, relative to that distant event which has not measured 'here', Earth doesn't exist since we similarly cannot collapse the wavefunction of 'here' as defined at that distant location. To do so (collapse a wave function outside our past light cone like that) would require faster than light cause/effect. Bell proved this: You can have locality (no FtL cause/effect) or you can have state unmeasured (counterfactuals), but not both.
« Last Edit: 19/10/2021 13:19:02 by Halc »
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, Curious Cat

Offline Harri

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 138
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #12 on: 19/10/2021 21:43:21 »
I have often read about infinite numbers of infinite universes and that there will be another 'me' doing exactly what I am doing now at this exact time. If I am the product of the laws of physics in 'our' universe, and there are an infinite number of universes, could there not be an infinite variety of the laws of physics applying to each universe which could mean there would never be another me?
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7258
  • Activity:
    17.5%
  • Thanked: 407 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #13 on: 19/10/2021 21:48:29 »
Quote from: Harri on 19/10/2021 21:43:21
could there not be an infinite variety of the laws of physics applying to each universe

We don't know. Each universe might have the same laws of physics. Or there could be an infinite number of different laws of physics, but with an infinite number of universes having the same laws as each other (and for every possible set of laws).
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri, Curious Cat

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2255
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 612 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #14 on: 20/10/2021 03:05:32 »
Quote from: Harri on 19/10/2021 21:43:21
I have often read about infinite numbers of infinite universes and that there will be another 'me' doing exactly what I am doing now at this exact time. If I am the product of the laws of physics in 'our' universe, and there are an infinite number of universes, could there not be an infinite variety of the laws of physics applying to each universe which could mean there would never be another me?
The point was that our one universe was large enough that there are other copies of you in this universe, never mind any hypothetical other ones. If they're not doing exactly what you're doing now, then they're not exact copies, are they? Depending on your QM interpretation of choice, these might be very (but computably) distant, or quite close, or completely nonexistent.

Are those copies also 'you'? That depends on how you define your identity, something most people don't think about deeply.
Do they 'exist'?  That depends on how you define 'exists'.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri, Zer0, Curious Cat

Offline Zer0

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 85 times
  • Homo EviliUs
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #15 on: 20/10/2021 08:22:45 »
" I Think... therefore I Am! "


Ps - & what about " Some of the other animals that survive without brains include the sea star, sea cucumber, sea lily, sea urchin, sea anemone, sea squirt, sea sponge, coral, and Portuguese Man-O-War. A brain is basically what results when a large group of nerve cells called neurons form one large cluster. "?
(Think about it)
🧠
Logged
1N73LL1G3NC3  15  7H3  481L17Y  70  4D4P7  70  CH4NG3.
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri, Curious Cat

Offline Harri

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 138
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #16 on: 20/10/2021 09:59:25 »
I know the idea of another 'me' out there in our universe is totally hypothetical and possibly not provable one way or another, ever. But for those who have indicated the possibility of this being the case, have they or do they need to take into consideration what happens to 'me' and our universe before relativity, at the uncertain quantum level?
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6200
  • Activity:
    29.5%
  • Thanked: 646 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #17 on: 20/10/2021 10:11:14 »
Quote from: Harri on 20/10/2021 09:59:25
But for those who have indicated the possibility of this being the case, have they or do they need to take into consideration what happens to 'me' and our universe before relativity, at the uncertain quantum level?
Not sure how relativity would come into it, but if you don’t know of their existence then it would be impossible to take into account what happens to them.
As @Halc says, you need to consider what you mean by identity ‘me vs otherme’. This has been explored to some extent in Star Trek and other sifi with respect to the transporter.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri, Zer0, Curious Cat

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2255
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 612 times
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #18 on: 20/10/2021 12:56:43 »
Quote from: Harri on 20/10/2021 09:59:25
I know the idea of another 'me' out there in our universe is totally hypothetical and possibly not provable one way or another
Again: If
A) our universe is spatially infinite
B) You accept that effect can precede cause or that a cause can have effects at faster than light
C) The universe is everywhere in some state at a given time, however unknown or unmeasured

Only then does it logically follow that there must be arrangements of atoms identical to the arrangement of atoms that is you here. All that remains is:
D) do you consider that identical arrangement of atoms to be another 'you' which of course depends on your definition of identity.

I personally accept only premise A) and neither B nor C, and therefore if asked if these copies exist, I'd say no.
It depends significantly on your quantum interpretation of choice. There's a nice chart on wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics#Comparisons
The 3rd to last column is 'local dynamics' which is green if B) is false.
The 2nd to last column is 'counterfactual' which is green if C) is true. No valid interpretation can list both as green, as proven by Bell.  Only the bottom two interpretations meet the criteria above. Essentially Bohmian mechanics. If that's not your interpretation of choice (it certainly isn't mine), then these 'copies' don't exist.

Quote
do they need to take into consideration what happens to 'me'
I don't think this can be answered without a definition of what you consider 'me' to mean.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Harri, Curious Cat

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14824
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1120 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What if the universe really is infinite?
« Reply #19 on: 21/10/2021 00:19:33 »
I think the question deserves inverting - often a good starting point for an investigation.

If the universe is finite, either it has a boundary, or we can define a vector r with its origin here and its endpoint outside the universe. So what is outside that boundary?  Why can't we define a vector with magnitude 2r?
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: universe  / cosmos  / infinity  / consciousness  / multiverse hypothesis 
 

Similar topics (5)

How do we know the Universe is expanding, and expanding into nothing?

Started by guest39538Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 43
Views: 25640
Last post 22/07/2020 05:10:15
by CPT ArkAngel
If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into?

Started by Tornado220Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 14
Views: 9009
Last post 06/07/2017 10:35:51
by paulggriffiths
Where is the "edge" of the Universe?

Started by paul.frBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 25
Views: 25181
Last post 01/04/2020 06:01:21
by hamdani yusuf
If the Universe is expanding, does this mean that space is expanding?

Started by EthosBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 14
Views: 15401
Last post 27/03/2020 21:05:55
by yor_on
How do we "know" that the universe is expanding?

Started by PmbPhyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 12
Views: 7803
Last post 10/01/2019 10:20:39
by Bored chemist
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.139 seconds with 80 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.