1
New Theories / Re: How do we measure the energy of a photon?
« on: 21/04/2024 10:44:57 »Interesting.Note that almost all of the universe is empty space. Thus it makes more sense to compute in 2d and display in 3d.Afaik, self driving Cars like Tesla see the world through several 2D cameras, which is then converted into 3D virtual world. It's just like how human drivers work.
A 4dApp would likely have no trouble driving a Tesla car. The 4d's of 4dabstractions are:
Driver (4d/time)
Display(3d/space)
Data(2d/thought)
and
Datastore(1d/memory)
Via function calls (imperative, top-down), a Driver (4d) System interacts with a Display (3d) System, a Display (3d) System interacts with a Data (2d) System, and a Data (2d) System interacts with a Datastore (1d) System.
Via raising events (reactive, bottom-up), a Datastore (1d) System interacts with a Data (2d) System, a Data (2d) System interacts with a Display (3d) System, and a Display (3d) System interacts with a Driver (4d) System.
In this scheme of things, a Driver System only interacts with 3d Systems. Which makes for easy programming when designing a Person simulation (which inherits a Driver System) where the Person is not aware of the workings of Data (thought) or Datastore (memory) Systems.
The Punter System in 4dRacing is a type of (inherits) Driver System.
As 4dAbstractions has always maintained, more and more evidence is coming that the Universe is a simulation. See https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/top-physicist-publishes-evidence-that-we-re-living-in-a-computer-simulation/ar-AA1nnIRL?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=6fbf841abad04738f27d4df2d8697943&ei=19
A universe is a likely a sphere with a sphere at its centre. And this central sphere is also a sphere with a sphere at its centre and this sphere is also a sphere with a sphere at ITS centre and so on and so on ad infinitely small particles. This exacly parallels the System/Star relationship in 4dAbstractions. This relation allows Universes/Systems to be composed of Abstraction Hierarcies. The linear string of 4dStars bears more than a passing relationship to the strngs of Amino Acids in proteins.
Which makes sense, given we, as people, deal in abstractions. Which makes it likely that a brain processes abstraction hierarchies of references to Real objects.
btw: A System/Universe getes more and more abstract as it gets closerr and closer to its centre. At dead centre it is fully abstract and, possibly, ready to go bang As it gets farther and farther away from its centre, it gets more and more concrete until it becomes fully concrete - i.e. god? This is how/why systems/universes form abstraction hierarchies - naturally.