Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: marzosia2 on 30/03/2016 15:06:05
-
.................m..................
.............TABLE................
.....................................
<<<< observer 2
observer 1 >>>
Mass m is on the table and not moving
force (reaction ) it is ABSOLUTE or RELATIVE information ?
? ? ? other point of view is able change Reaction ( m- table ) ? ? ?
-
2 +4 +3 = 9
a + b + c = f(x)
if a and b and c ∈ N ==> f(x) it is Natural Function
Force = F(a,b,c) [ Newton = kg • meter / sec ] a,b,c arguments
If F(a,b,c) ABSOLUTE ==> a and b,and c are absolute !
You can not build absolute function F if arguments are relative !
-
1, Don't use maths when you have no clue what you are doing. It's like arranging words in a pretty pattern. You could write a beautiful looking latin script but it would be meaningless. Same with maths, looking like maths is not the same as being maths.
2, Force is experienced by the object upon which it acts. So it is irrelevant what other observers see or think.
-
2, Force is experienced by the object upon which it acts. So it is irrelevant what other observers see or think.
GREAT !! VERY GOOD it is FACT !!!!
F(a,b,c ) = FORCE
FORCE IT IS FUNCTION F(a,b,c) ! WE ARE 100% SURE that F IS ABSOLUTE !
a,b,c - function's arguments !
( a= time , b = mass , c = distance )
QUESTIONS :
Q1:
FORCE IS ABSOLUTE ! CAN YOU TELL ME MORE ABOUT ARGUMENTS ( absolute ? / relative? ) ?
Q2:
How to build absolute function and do not use absolute arguments ? ( POSSIBLE ? / IMPOSSIBLE ?)
EINSTEIN TOLD THAT: ( a= time , b = mass , c = distance ) are relative !
please use mathematica...
CAN YOU TELL ME MORE ABOUT HIS THEORY ? ( TRUE /FALSE ) ?
Force ( relative variable a , relative variable b , relative variable c ) = F(a,b,c ) ??? No ! FALSE
Force ( absolute variable a , absolute variable b , absolute variable c ) = F(a,b,c ) ??? YES TRUE !!!
MATHEMATICA IS ABLE ALSO explain MORE STRONGER FACT ! ...:
Force ( relative variable a, absolute variable b , absolute variable c ) = F(a,b,c ) ??? No ! FALSE
Force ( absolute variable a , relative variable b , absolute variable c ) = F(a,b,c ) ??? No ! FALSE
Force ( absolute variable a , absolute variable b ,relative variable c) = F(a,b,c ) ??? No ! FALSE
1, Don't use maths when you have no clue what you are doing. It's like arranging words in a pretty pattern. You could write a beautiful looking latin script but it would be meaningless. Same with maths, looking like maths is not the same as being maths.
very good argument please inform by Your e- mail people in LIGO !
(https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/assets/detection/Black-Hole-Merger-Simulation-b0132583fe397ab92e383dd291876395.jpg)
exist 3 options :
a) They are intelectual ignorants !
b) They understand that You have right and they speculating TRUE ( dirty game )
They have many many public moneys and They are very strong organism
a lot of people using this money
Typical asymetry situation
( small person (You ) is informing by e-mail huge organisation about fact that destroing this what They are doing many years.. )
c) In media and In books we have not real informations
because ARMY protecting knowledge about VERY PRECISSION and CHEAP GPS
- details ... please read about Doppler's mechanism
inside Michelson Morley ... I showed this on FORUM ...)
To find Doppler I made many tests ( 2012 ---now )
5 years my own work without outside help
( nobody supporting people like me ... )
all my instruments and experiments I made my own hand !
GPS ? ...in universe exist 7-10 constant vectors ( SPEED )
to explain You position I need minimal 3 vectors.
I no need use stars or other objects
around Earth and on the Earth to exlain you X,Y,Z position
( SPEED it is not reall object
we can compare speed to very special constant wind !
wind's direction/ speed/ force = good information for people who are on the sea to find port )
Earth own rotation is able inform you
about geographic WIDE / and level above sea !
I showed two Experiments
( Michelson Morley on Equator / North Pole) it will not be the same Doppler
( the same instrument will not give the same resoults Equator/ North Pole )
30 km/s - Earth around SUN vector
220 km/s - Earth and Sun around Galactica
....
......
EXIST ALSO OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEM ( WE CAN MEASURE THIS PROBLEM )
I KEEPING THIS PROBLEM IN SECRET !
( it will be very easy for me to show evidence DAY and TIME that I made test )
this information will help me prove THAT I'm AUTHOR
( my family is not Rich - I not trust in TRUE
a lot of people like my ideas )
topic on this forum :
Doppler's mechanism inside Michelson Morley
Started by marzosia2
0 Replies
61 Views Last post 30/03/2016 14:48:00
by marzosia2
-
2, Force is experienced by the object upon which it acts. So it is irrelevant what other observers see or think.
GREAT !! VERY GOOD it is FACT !!!!
F(a,b,c ) = FORCE
FORCE IT IS FUNCTION F(a,b,c) ! WE ARE 100% SURE that F IS ABSOLUTE !
a,b,c - function's arguments !
( a= time , b = mass , c = distance )
NO!
Force is force. It is not dependant upon a, b or c. Your psudo-maths drivel is utterly meaningless or worng.
If I was the moderator here you would be banned for being mad.
-
If I was the moderator here you would be banned for being mad. [/color]
That would be bad moderating , the persons native language is not English, the person is Polish, like he already stated, I am struggling to understand the person, so it would be wrong to say he is wrong when I don't understand him.
A good moderator would confine him to new theories or just chat and ask him to refrain from posting in main forum because it seems like ''clutter''.
I happily accept when most of my threads are moved, understandable.
I ask questions in this section and make imagination in new theories,
Marzosia please do not post in this section unless you have simple question, take the answers over to new theories if you wish to argue them.
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newton
Unit system SI derived unit
Unit of Force
Symbol N
Named after Sir Isaac Newton
In SI base units: kg ⋅ m/s2
OK
a= A [sec.] , b= B [kilogram] , c= C [meters]
-
2, Force is experienced by the object upon which it acts. So it is irrelevant what other observers see or think.
GREAT !! VERY GOOD it is FACT !!!!
F(a,b,c ) = FORCE
FORCE IT IS FUNCTION F(a,b,c) ! WE ARE 100% SURE that F IS ABSOLUTE !
a,b,c - function's arguments !
( a= time , b = mass , c = distance )
NO!
Force is force. It is not dependant upon a, b or c. Your psudo-maths drivel is utterly meaningless or worng.
If I was the moderator here you would be banned for being mad.
Tim the Plumber FORCE is NOT FORCE ! it has got Si symbol [N] and exist relations between a,b,c ! Your post is New theory - do You have any evidence or it is your own words ?