Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: aetzbar on 30/10/2017 11:08:00
-
With a philosophy of measurement, you understand the secret of the five things
After the primordial person naturally realized that between two heartbeats there is a "quantitative thing" that repeats itself,
He gave a name "to this quantitative thing" and it is time.
This quantity is a sign in number 1, and began to measure.
The amount of time required to get from the village to the river is 17
Knowing natural man grasped that there are only 5 quantitative things.
It's a wonder ... why only 5?
-
With a philosophy of measurement, you understand the secret of the five things
After the primordial person naturally realized that between two heartbeats there is a "quantitative thing" that repeats itself,
He gave a name "to this quantitative thing" and it is time.
This quantity is a sign in number 1, and began to measure.
The amount of time required to get from the village to the river is 17
Knowing natural man grasped that there are only 5 quantitative things.
It's a wonder ... why only 5?
There is actually more than 5 ''quantitative'' things that are measured by 1 quantitative thing, that quantity being numbers.
Quantity is a generalised term for an amount of something. So all though things have different quantities, they can always be measured by the quantity of numbers. Now the question I think you are really asking , do we understand the different signs we add at the end of a quantity. We do!.
We have one quantity which is numbers, then we have different ''signs,
-
I'm not talking about discrete amount, like 2 apples, or 177 crates.
I'm talking about a continuous amount, and there are only 5 things in the world that have a continuous amount.
Length, area, volume, time, and energy.
Man has natural knowledge, and he has discovered these five things.
Since man has a natural knowledge of quantity, he arbitrarily chose quantity, and marked it with 1
This is how man began his scientific practice with five consecutive quantitative things.
This is physics
-
I'm talking about a continuous amount, and there are only 5 things in the world that have a continuous amount.
Length, area, volume, time, and energy.
Ok , I understand you now, the answer is no at this time. By continuous you mean infinite, we can not prove there is no boundary at this time.
-
There are quantitative natural informations in every physical theory
Continuous passive time fills the infinite space.
The continuous energy fills the infinite space.
By combining certain amounts of passive time and energy, a certain element has been created.
In other words, the material is formed from a combination of passive time and energy.
From this it is possible to create a new physical theory, different from the theories of Newton and Einstein
-
From this it is possible to create a new physical theory, different from the theories of Newton and Einstein
Newton's and Einstein's theories give the right answers.
If your ideas give different answers, then they are useless.
-
I am talking about fundamental concepts on which a physical theory is built
Newton - gravity, mass and acceleration (only acceleration is a scientific concept)
Einstein - energy and mass (only the concept of energy is scientific)
I suggested (energy and passive time) both concepts are scientific.
The main idea is that a scientific concept is quantitative, continuous, and measured.
Acacia: There are only five scientific concepts in the world.
Length, area, volume, time and energy.
-
I am talking about fundamental concepts on which a physical theory is built
No
You are talking nonsense.
The main idea is that a scientific concept is quantitative, continuous, and measured.
We know that many things are not continuous- they are quantised.
-
In order to contribute to your good feeling, I will say ... you are right
-
In order to contribute to your good feeling, I will say ... you are right
You do not seem to understand.
It's not that I don't "think" you are right.
We have done many experiments that prove you are wrong.
My feelings on the issue do not affect reality.