Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: guest39538 on 24/11/2017 10:36:25
-
Hello guys, as you may know I believe there is a science to everything , any subject. Of recent I have been doing some hands on investigation into the methods of Paedophile hunters.
Now what I have experienced so far is quite shocking, I think they could be sending innocent men to jail regardless of the seemingly countless evidence.
Now I do not want to stop these guys and women doing a very great job. However I can not stand idol and watch possible innocent men go jail by using evidence ambiguity.
I also do not want to help the real guilty ones to escape jail either.
I think the science is words and semantics , I am not sure.
Please advice how I should continue ?
-
I will add their methods for anybody who does not know.
They set up several decoys on chat sites
The decoys talk to men
Some of the men arrange a meet already been told they are a child.
The hunters sting them and catch them on the meet
The hunters have all the chat logs etc
Easy grooming charge
Problem: Some of the hunter teams use 18+ sites where there is roll play and all sorts going on. I have investigated these 18+ chat sites and believe me it it was quite shocking.
The first night a random women age 22 sent me a picture of her boob
A 18 year old wanted roll play rape
A 18 year wanted me to sleep with her knowing I was 44.
Of course I was not down for any of that.
So anyway I think some of the more stupid blokes think they are roll playing because it clearly states 18 above age on their profiles.
What do you think?
added- the conclusion I want to reach is finding them a solid method.
-
Please advice how I should continue ?
I don’t think this forum is the appropriate place for this.
If you feel the methods are inappropriate you can present your evidence to the legal watchdogs.
-
Before this thread disappears, I think the courts rule that entrapment by itself will not result in a conviction. It is the beginning of establishing a chain of evidence of actual illegal activity. If anything, the internet has just made the first step easier.
-
I will add their methods for anybody who does not know.
They set up several decoys on chat sites
The decoys talk to men
Some of the men arrange a meet already been told they are a child.
The hunters sting them and catch them on the meet
The hunters have all the chat logs etc
Easy grooming charge
Problem: Some of the hunter teams use 18+ sites where there is roll play and all sorts going on. I have investigated these 18+ chat sites and believe me it it was quite shocking.
The first night a random women age 22 sent me a picture of her boob
A 18 year old wanted roll play rape
A 18 year wanted me to sleep with her knowing I was 44.
Of course I was not down for any of that.
So anyway I think some of the more stupid blokes think they are roll playing because it clearly states 18 above age on their profiles.
What do you think?
added- the conclusion I want to reach is finding them a solid method.
I think it is a desperate attempt to get people to respond to you and should not be here.
-
I think it is a desperate attempt to get people to respond to you and should not be here.
If you think that, then you must be the fool who replies.
Not at all, unlike most of the people on science forums, my delusions of grandeur have burnt themselves out. I no longer care about science or replies.
I quite like law and the science of law, I might go learnt that.
-
Further research as lead me to now believe the problem is of epidemic proportions.
Having a male alias on these sights the messages received are approx 2 a night.
Having a female alias on these sights on pretending to be a female approx 100 messages every 10 minutes.
As posing as a 18 year old women I manged to engage several much older males in conversation.
I literally sold myself for two grand and had more offers such as buying me expensive gifts.
Now some of these individuals I told them I was really 16. They did not really care and I deemed some of these men who were in their 40s and 50s, to being borderline Paedophiles which seems a bigger problem than Paedophiles.
My conclusion so far is that we need to protect not only children, but children from 16 - 18 who are still naive and gullible.
I do not personally think a 40-50 year old man should be legally allowed to go with a 16 year old.
I believe there is science in statistics.
These borderline Paedophiles are using the law to their advantage
p.s maybe we can adopt the American way of 21
Added- a legal age of 21 would also help with population control.
Added- Now the solution to online grooming is to take way the ''food''. If all internet sites had age restriction and i'd required, there could be no online grooming if we take away the ''food''.
added- A national I.D card for adults and children would take away anonymous .