Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: LB7 on 30/04/2018 14:38:42

Title: Far attraction to prove the non conservation of the energy
Post by: LB7 on 30/04/2018 14:38:42
My theoretical device works and I try to prove it works with gravity and mass too. For that, I use an external planet, very far from my device and the planet move in translation when my device is deformed.

Case 1/ the energy is conserved:

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Case 2/ the energy is conserved, I move out the white parts from the bottom and I move the same white parts between the rectangles:

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Case 3/ The energy is not conserved, I move out the white parts and I move in water:

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: Far attraction to prove the non conservation of the energy
Post by: Bored chemist on 01/05/2018 19:39:12
Have you allowed for the work done by or against gravity when the planet moves with respect to the device?
Title: Re: Far attraction to prove the non conservation of the energy
Post by: LB7 on 02/05/2018 09:56:28
Have you allowed for the work done by or against gravity when the planet moves with respect to the device?

I have. I compared 3 cases. The last case can't keep constant the sum of energy is the two first keep constant the sum of energy.
Title: Re: Far attraction to prove the non conservation of the energy
Post by: Bored chemist on 02/05/2018 19:38:34
How have you calculated the gravitational energy change?