Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: opportunity on 06/10/2018 13:49:22

Title: Does the current scientific "rule of law" allow for revolutionary new ideas?
Post by: opportunity on 06/10/2018 13:49:22
Science has developed through millennia of theories and results to back those theories.

The ultimate flaw though here is using a-priori of time and space from millennia ago.

Is it possible that the scientific a-priori for the ideas of time and space can be "better refined" with the advent of this age of tremendous data?

For instance, space can be very well accepted as 3 dimensions. That's given. Yet what about the idea of "time" as a single dimension? Why can't "time" be a mathematical algorithm?

I've been working a new theory for time as an algorithm, and I've been able to establish some very interesting results, more efficient than using time as a simple "arrow", 1-dimensional.

This is my work so far:

<<<COMMERCIAL LINK REMOVED>>>

Does anyone else in the forum think its possible science is cutting itself short using the current "rule of law" a-priori for the concept of space and time, a "rule of law" orated in BC times, namely 3-d space and 1 dimensional time?