Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: jerrygg38 on 02/03/2020 12:16:02
-
Why does space time bend?
Einstein proposes a model of the universe where space time bends. A planet travels around a start following the curvature of space time. His calculations are excellent as he describes the orbit of Mercury and the bending of photons around a star. Yet what has he done? He looks at the universe and formulates equations which correctly calculate space time problems. Then he assumes that what he observes is the laws of physics. He assumes that it is both the cause and the effect.
He has the effect of gravity correctly. Yet he does not have the cause. The question is what causes a planet to orbit around a star and what bends the photons around a star.
As we look at a planet in space we find that the atoms and molecules are vibrating. In the dot-wave theory the vibration for particles occupies two light speed (alternately two times) dimensions. The planet in the Co dimension pushes against the Cs dimension and the Cs dimension pushes back. There are equal and opposite forces.
The sun is pushing against the fifth dimension and so is the Earth. The net result is a vector that causes a net force between the sun and the Earth. The motion of the Earth around the sun produces an equal and opposite force and the Earth remains in orbit.
When Einstein looked at simple Newtonian equations for the motion of planets and stars, he realized that you could not use point sources at the center of the planets to arrive at their orbits. The solution is more complicated. The vibration of the sun and all the planets produce complex wave type equations. The planets and stars do not attract each other. They are pushed together by space itself.
Einstein wrote the equation that worked quite well but he never understood what caused gravity. Although our dimension operates at light speed Co, it is held together by light speed Cs. The light speed Cs dimension appears as the opposite side of the same coin. It is one integrated package.
-
What evidence do you have that this isn't mere speculation?
-
Kryptid asks
What evidence do you have that this isn't mere speculation?
GG: No evidence. I am looking for others to present a reason why they believe that space time bends as per Einstein. It seems to me that Einstein has the effects of gravity correct but does not present a reason why gravity works. What do you think?
-
No evidence.
Then what reason is there to think that it is correct?
I am looking for others to present a reason why they believe that space time bends as per Einstein.
Because all of the predictions made according to general relativity that have been tested have turned out to be correct. Time dilation, gravitational waves, the geodetic effect and gravitational lensing have all been detected and have the values predicted by the theory.
It seems to me that Einstein has the effects of gravity correct but does not present a reason why gravity works. What do you think?
One can ponder any reason for why mass-energy causes space-time to distort, but it's all speculation unless something testable results from that reasoning. Can your model be tested?
-
Naked 3.3.20 8 AM
Discussion with Kryptid
GG: No evidence.
Kryptid: Then what reason is there to think that it is correct?
GG: It appears to me that the universe operates upon simple principles that can readily be understood by most people. Einstein’s theory is quite complex. In addition the String theory mathematicians have formulated multi-dimensional mathematics and this helps us to understand the possibility that the universe comes from another dimension. If that is so then it will someday return to another dimension.
Since Einstein’s space time equations are excellent, any multi-dimensional equations must in the end produce the same results as Einstein. I produce a fifth dimension by specifying that we exist within a higher light speed dimension. That is a very simple solution. More complex solutions are possible. In any event after having studied many possibilities over the years, my solution is a most likely possibility in my opinion.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 00:38:52
I am looking for others to present a reason why they believe that space time bends as per Einstein.
Kryptoid: Because all of the predictions made according to general relativity that have been tested have turned out to be correct. Time dilation, gravitational waves, the geodetic effect and gravitational lensing have all been detected and have the values predicted by the theory.
GG: Yes. It appears that mathematically the best fit solution at present is Einstein’s work. However he never explained gravity from a physical perspective. His equation’s show the effect of gravity but do not show what gravity is. For an analogy he shows the final picture of a pyramid but he does not show the step by step design of the inner structure of the pyramid.
What causes space and time to appear to bend? He has one time dimension. That was a great leap forward. Yet if that one dimension was really two dimensions then we have a mechanism by which the universe will perpetually oscillate forever. Without time cause and effect are gone and the universe always existed. Philosophically a perpetual universe is a better answer than a space time one that started at the big bang.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 00:38:52
It seems to me that Einstein has the effects of gravity correct but does not present a reason why gravity works. What do you think?
One can ponder any reason for why mass-energy causes space-time to distort, but it's all speculation unless something testable results from that reasoning. Can your model be tested?
GG: My model predicts that in the future an oscillating spherical electromagnetic field focused toward a pinpoint will cause the protons to self-destruct. This will release enormous clean energy to power future space ships up to a speed of 0.2C. Then it will be understood that light speed Cs energy will be produced which flows into the fourth and fifth dimensions. Linear accelerators add energy to the protons but do not readily destroy them with a net energy gain. This is just an engineering project and will be done within a hundred years.
-
GG: It appears to me that the universe operates upon simple principles that can readily be understood by most people. Einstein’s theory is quite complex. In addition the String theory mathematicians have formulated multi-dimensional mathematics and this helps us to understand the possibility that the universe comes from another dimension. If that is so then it will someday return to another dimension.
Since Einstein’s space time equations are excellent, any multi-dimensional equations must in the end produce the same results as Einstein. I produce a fifth dimension by specifying that we exist within a higher light speed dimension. That is a very simple solution. More complex solutions are possible. In any event after having studied many possibilities over the years, my solution is a most likely possibility in my opinion.
You do realize that a simple solution is not necessarily a correct solution, don't you?
If that is so then it will someday return to another dimension.
That does not necessarily follow.
Yes. It appears that mathematically the best fit solution at present is Einstein’s work. However he never explained gravity from a physical perspective. His equation’s show the effect of gravity but do not show what gravity is. For an analogy he shows the final picture of a pyramid but he does not show the step by step design of the inner structure of the pyramid.
You don't have a physical mechanism either. All you have done is push the problem back by claiming that objects in the Co dimension push against objects in the Cs dimension and that the Cs dimension pushes back. You haven't explained how the pushing occurs nor have you demonstrated that such a model can reproduce the experimentally measured values that relativity does. Not to mention that invoking Newton's third law doesn't make sense here because dimensions don't have mass and therefore can't be involved in an action-reaction scenario.
What causes space and time to appear to bend? He has one time dimension. That was a great leap forward. Yet if that one dimension was really two dimensions then we have a mechanism by which the universe will perpetually oscillate forever.
Explain how time can be two dimensions and what reason we have to believe that it is two dimensions.
Without time cause and effect are gone and the universe always existed.
Time and cause and effect are pretty well-documented phenomena. You can't just get rid of them.
Philosophically a perpetual universe is a better answer than a space time one that started at the big bang.
Debatable, but philosophy should take a back seat to evidence when it comes to a scientific theory.
GG: My model predicts that in the future an oscillating spherical electromagnetic field focused toward a pinpoint will cause the protons to self-destruct. This will release enormous clean energy to power future space ships up to a speed of 0.2C. Then it will be understood that light speed Cs energy will be produced which flows into the fourth and fifth dimensions. Linear accelerators add energy to the protons but do not readily destroy them with a net energy gain.
So under what circumstances, hypothetically-speaking, would future scientists be able to say, "Okay, we tried it, and it didn't work. So we know this model is wrong"?
This is just an engineering project and will be done within a hundred years.
You can't make absolute declarations like this. You don't know that this will ever be done, much less in a hundred years.
-
The bending of space-time is a mathematical construct. It is how the math needs to comply to correlate the experimental data. One simple way to prove is to use a spherical coordinate system. This system is shown below. The concentric spheres of curved space-time would already be plotted in this coordinate system. There is no bending needed. The operative variable becomes radius which does not bend in this system for a star or planet. That job goes to the two angle coordinates.
(https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmathworld.wolfram.com%2Fimages%2Feps-gif%2FSphericalCoordinates_1201.gif&hash=49d7bacd72f74211b6e031409b8b3c1e)
A Cartesian coordinate system will appear to bend, since a cube is not a natural way to model most gravity generating objects of the universe. Most objects, like stars or planets are closer to spheres than to cubes. The cubed star was used since this was easier. Did you ever try to use spherical coordinates for straight line travel? It is very cumbersome for such an easy task.
If space-time and gravity had been developed by Einstein, using spherical coordinates, the mystery question would be what is the theoretical significance of the two angles, Θ,Φ? This mystery could get esoteric. It may be speculated that the mysterious Θ and Φ, alter space and time by forcing stars to be spheres, But is would nothing more than a math construct.
-
Naked 3.3.20 10 pm
Discussion with Kryptid:
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 12:23:50
GG: It appears to me that the universe operates upon simple principles that can readily be understood by most people. Einstein’s theory is quite complex. In addition the String theory mathematicians have formulated multi-dimensional mathematics and this helps us to understand the possibility that the universe comes from another dimension. If that is so then it will someday return to another dimension.
Since Einstein’s space time equations are excellent, any multi-dimensional equations must in the end produce the same results as Einstein. I produce a fifth dimension by specifying that we exist within a higher light speed dimension. That is a very simple solution. More complex solutions are possible. In any event after having studied many possibilities over the years, my solution is a most likely possibility in my opinion.
Kryptid: You do realize that a simple solution is not necessarily a correct solution, don't you?
GG: Yes. I could be wrong and the inner voice could have misled me. Yet it perplexes me why it has been so determined that it knows the truth. For the most part it has never deceived me. It showed me a space ship with the proton engine in it. It says that the universe is composed of dot-waves. What choice do I have but to attempt to understand what it says?
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 12:23:50
If that is so then it will someday return to another dimension.
Kryptid: That does not necessarily follow.
GG: Of course there are many possible solutions. We could be waste material from a more perfect universe. Just junk locked in perpetual agony. Yet I believe we will return from whence we came.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 12:23:50
Yes. It appears that mathematically the best fit solution at present is Einstein’s work. However he never explained gravity from a physical perspective. His equation’s show the effect of gravity but do not show what gravity is. For an analogy he shows the final picture of a pyramid but he does not show the step by step design of the inner structure of the pyramid.
Kryptid: You don't have a physical mechanism either. All you have done is push the problem back by claiming that objects in the Co dimension push against objects in the Cs dimension and that the Cs dimension pushes back. You haven't explained how the pushing occurs nor have you demonstrated that such a model can reproduce the experimentally measured values that relativity does. Not to mention that invoking Newton's third law doesn't make sense here because dimensions don't have mass and therefore can't be involved in an action-reaction scenario.
GG: My spherical dot-waves oscillate between the Co dimension and the Cs dimension. The photonic dot-waves tend to stay in their own dimension but slowly radiation occurs which transfers Co energy to the Cs dimension where it says. This causes a loss of mass/energy and a net force due to the radiation. Yet the main force of gravity is the pressure of light speed Cs dot-waves upon the Co/Cs particles during the time they are in the Cs dimension.
This is similar to the pressure exerted by the natural gas law. As more Co energy is transferred into Cs photons, the universe expands. Thus we live in an expanding multi-dimensional space time balloon.
As far as producing equations that match Einstein’s that is beyond my mathematical ability.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 12:23:50
What causes space and time to appear to bend? He has one time dimension. That was a great leap forward. Yet if that one dimension was really two dimensions then we have a mechanism by which the universe will perpetually oscillate forever.
Kryptid: Explain how time can be two dimensions and what reason we have to believe that it is two dimensions.
GG: It is two time dimensions or two light speed dimensions.
Time 1 = Distance / Light speed1 = meters/ meters per second = seconds
Time 2 = Distance/ Light speed 2
An object exists in time dimension 1 which is light speed 1 some of the distance it travels and in time dimension 2 some of the distance it travels. As more photonic energy is added to the object, it spends more of its distance traveled in time dimension 2. Thus it travels a shortened distance and its clock slows toward zero. Einstein’s formula is true but the object has traveled in two light speed or time dimensions.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 12:23:50
Without time, cause and effect are gone and the universe always existed.
Kryptid: Time and cause and effect are pretty well-documented phenomena. You can't just get rid of them.
GG: We are here and we have a clock so it seems that there was a zero time. Yet some physicists and various philosophers have questioned whether time actually exists. Once we eliminate time the initial cause and effect is meaningless. Yet the big bang inversion is a simple starting point. We can say that time started with the big bang inversion. Yet it is more reasonable to say that when we attempt to understand how the energy that produced the universe came into existence. We cannot answer that question. Therefore on a grand scale time is not real.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 12:23:50
Philosophically a perpetual universe is a better answer than a space time one that started at the big bang.
Kryptoid: Debatable, but philosophy should take a back seat to evidence when it comes to a scientific theory.
GG: Science can never answer how the energy of the universe came into existence. Religion tries but who made the magical God?
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 12:23:50
GG: My model predicts that in the future an oscillating spherical electromagnetic field focused toward a pinpoint will cause the protons to self-destruct. This will release enormous clean energy to power future space ships up to a speed of 0.2C. Then it will be understood that light speed Cs energy will be produced which flows into the fourth and fifth dimensions. Linear accelerators add energy to the protons but do not readily destroy them with a net energy gain.
Kryptid: So under what circumstances, hypothetically-speaking, would future scientists be able to say, "Okay, we tried it, and it didn't work. So we know this model is wrong"?
GG: Scientists today are trying to build miniature black holes using laser beams. So at any day they may succeed in destroying the protons. Perhaps it will take 100 years. Perhaps only a few more years. Since other scientists are experimenting with Quantum entanglement, they may come to realize that we have a higher light speed dimension. In any event I look for physicists doing such things and offer my books to them. And some ask for an autographed copy. So I feed my ideas into some who do this type of work.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 12:23:50
This is just an engineering project and will be done within a hundred years.
Kryptid: You can't make absolute declarations like this. You don't know that this will ever be done, much less in a hundred years.
GG: My inner voice thinks so. I could be wrong and it could be wrong. Ultimately this has been an interesting hobby for me. Fortunately I made a good living as an Engineer until the big layoff in 1993. Then I survived on my 401 K, reduced pension, and small handyman business until social security came in. I worked for bosses since age 17.5 until age 55. It is good to be free of having to work for others.
-
Yet it perplexes me why it has been so determined that it knows the truth.
I've seen plenty of cranks on this site that were determined that they knew the truth when their ideas completely flew in the face of the evidence. So being confident in the truth of something is not evidence for that same truth.
It says that the universe is composed of dot-waves. What choice do I have but to attempt to understand what it says?
Attempting to understand what it says should not be mistaken for believing that what it says is correct. It's obviously been wrong before if the initial equation it came up with for calculating the age of the Universe was wrong. You had to add in cos 30 degrees later on, remember? If it was wrong before, it can be wrong again.
Even if your subconscious was some kind of perfect computer, it would still be limited by the kind of information it was given to work with. A computer's output is only as good as the data put into it. Based on our earlier discussions, you seem to have pretty much ignored the nuclear forces and certain conservation properties (lepton number and baryon number) when you were making your model. As such, you can't expect your subconscious to give the right answer when it hasn't been given all the needed data to produce the right answer. The nuclear forces are an important part of the puzzle that can't be neglected.
Yet I believe we will return from whence we came.
Belief is not evidence.
GG: My spherical dot-waves oscillate between the Co dimension and the Cs dimension. The photonic dot-waves tend to stay in their own dimension but slowly radiation occurs which transfers Co energy to the Cs dimension where it says. This causes a loss of mass/energy and a net force due to the radiation. Yet the main force of gravity is the pressure of light speed Cs dot-waves upon the Co/Cs particles during the time they are in the Cs dimension.
This is similar to the pressure exerted by the natural gas law. As more Co energy is transferred into Cs photons, the universe expands. Thus we live in an expanding multi-dimensional space time balloon.
Again, you're just saying that dot-waves do this or dot-waves do that, but that's not an explanation of a mechanism explaining why they do what they do.
As far as producing equations that match Einstein’s that is beyond my mathematical ability.
Beyond your subconscious ability too, I presume?
Once we eliminate time the initial cause and effect is meaningless.
If that's true, then why do we observe cause and effect in everyday life?
GG: It is two time dimensions or two light speed dimensions.
Time 1 = Distance / Light speed1 = meters/ meters per second = seconds
Time 2 = Distance/ Light speed 2
An object exists in time dimension 1 which is light speed 1 some of the distance it travels and in time dimension 2 some of the distance it travels. As more photonic energy is added to the object, it spends more of its distance traveled in time dimension 2. Thus it travels a shortened distance and its clock slows toward zero. Einstein’s formula is true but the object has traveled in two light speed or time dimensions.
And your evidence for this is... what, exactly?
Science can never answer how the energy of the universe came into existence.
You don't know that.
GG: Scientists today are trying to build miniature black holes using laser beams. So at any day they may succeed in destroying the protons. Perhaps it will take 100 years. Perhaps only a few more years. Since other scientists are experimenting with Quantum entanglement, they may come to realize that we have a higher light speed dimension. In any event I look for physicists doing such things and offer my books to them. And some ask for an autographed copy. So I feed my ideas into some who do this type of work.
That didn't answer my question. What kind of experiment coming up empty would demonstrate that the idea is wrong?
My inner voice thinks so.
And...?
-
Naked 3.5.20 10 am
Conversation with Kryptoid:
GG: Yet it perplexes me why it has been so determined that it knows the truth.
Kryptid: I've seen plenty of cranks on this site that were determined that they knew the truth when their ideas completely flew in the face of the evidence. So being confident in the truth of something is not evidence for that same truth.
GG: That is for sure. So I put out the truth as I see it with the hope that others in the future will find evidence for that truth. That is all I can do. When you work on electrical problems at work and build things or fix things, the proof is in the pudding. I am a problem solver not a physicist. So I give solutions for those who might be interested. And I find some physicists and mathematicians around the world who are happy to look at the truth I present. Yet I am still correcting my work.
When I asked the spirit I encountered “How can you find the truth? It said “Deny everything until you can no longer deny it” So I said “You are a hallucination and you do not exist” The spirit grew angry and shut down my body. I could not breathe or move. It was like being encased in glass. My heart raced and I only had a few more seconds left to live. In my mind I screamed “I yield the point”. It released me and I fell to the floor.
Throughout history many people have strange spiritual encounters. I have had them since early childhood. Yet as a child they were friendly. The 1981 encounters were not friendly. The spirit wanted answers from me. So I work and study and feed the information into it and it produces solutions. The spirit either within me or external to me is a learning machine.
There are many possible solutions to what the spirit is. It could occupy another section of my brain. It could be a dual personality that exists within me. When in an excited state I can communicate with it while I am awake. Most often it merely appears as an inner voice or within dreams. In 1981 it was very active. Then it appeared mostly in dreams that were spaced long periods of time apart.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 14:01:51
It says that the universe is composed of dot-waves. What choice do I have but to attempt to understand what it says?
Kryptid says: Attempting to understand what it says should not be mistaken for believing that what it says is correct. It's obviously been wrong before if the initial equation it came up with for calculating the age of the Universe was wrong. You had to add in cos 30 degrees later on, remember? If it was wrong before, it can be wrong again.
GG: That certainly is possible. The information I provide it allows it to solve the various problems I had. Since most involved my knowledge of electricity since high school, it had an excellent background in that field. It demanded that I study physics, philosophy, and religion. Assuming the spirit was my inner being, it wanted to understand the meaning of its existence. I did not want to do this but the spirit within me forced me into obedience. Some philosophers believe that information on our DNA is carried down through the centuries.
Kryptid says: Even if your subconscious was some kind of perfect computer, it would still be limited by the kind of information it was given to work with. A computer's output is only as good as the data put into it. Based on our earlier discussions, you seem to have pretty much ignored the nuclear forces and certain conservation properties (lepton number and baryon number) when you were making your model. As such, you can't expect your subconscious to give the right answer when it hasn't been given all the needed data to produce the right answer. The nuclear forces are an important part of the puzzle that can't be neglected.
GG: To be a great physicist you need an excellent memory. I have a calculating brain but not a memory brain. So I interest myself with the simple world of dot-waves. You deal with the more complex world of higher structures. Things get more complex as you move upward to the properties of the many particles and sub-particles.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 14:01:51
Yet I believe we will return from whence we came.
Kryptid: Belief is not evidence.
GG: True.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 14:01:51
GG: My spherical dot-waves oscillate between the Co dimension and the Cs dimension. The photonic dot-waves tend to stay in their own dimension but slowly radiation occurs which transfers Co energy to the Cs dimension where it says. This causes a loss of mass/energy and a net force due to the radiation. Yet the main force of gravity is the pressure of light speed Cs dot-waves upon the Co/Cs particles during the time they are in the Cs dimension.
This is similar to the pressure exerted by the natural gas law. As more Co energy is transferred into Cs photons, the universe expands. Thus we live in an expanding multi-dimensional space time balloon.
Kryptid: Again, you're just saying that dot-waves do this or dot-waves do that, but that's not an explanation of a mechanism explaining why they do what they do.
GG: They are the primary mechanism of the universe. They are what they are. So I specify their characteristics. The premise is that the entire universe is built from two things. When you look at the structure of life, you find that all life comes from a basic cell structure. At the bottom is simplicity. Then as you move upward things get more and more complicated. Finally you reach higher life and man himself. Out of the simplicity of the dot-waves the complexity of the universe occurs.
From science we know that plus charge and minus charge exist. We also know that waves exist. With a multi-dimensional universe, dot-waves must exist in all dimensions. We then have oscillations between dimensions. We also know that photons are different from particles. Thus photons tend to remain within their dimension. Thus they only oscillate in their dimension such as light speed Co. Other photons will oscillate in the light speed Cs dimension.
The relationship between the dimensions must be particles which exist in both dimensions. This permits photons to enter a particle and its energy will be transferred between dimensions. Some Co photons will find themselves in the Cs dimension. Thus we have a mechanism which transfers energy from our light speed Co physical universe into the light speed Cs photonic universe.
At the big bang inversion photonic Cs energy flowed toward a common small volume and emerged as Co and Cs energy. The particles were produced and the photonic universe became the material particle universe. Large amounts of Cs energy were released causing the Co/Cs universe to expand rapidly.
I have no answer how the energy of the universe got here. I have no answer why the dot-waves behave the way they do. It is what it is.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 14:01:51
As far as producing equations that match Einstein’s that is beyond my mathematical ability.
Kryptid says: Beyond your subconscious ability too, I presume?
GG: I used to think that my inner voice came from the creator God of the Universe. I did not understand why it demanded that I work and study. Slowly I came to the conclusion that the voice within me came from my inner being. It had a greater ability than I had. For example on one physicists test, the professor gave us a problem that no one had found a formula for. It could only be solved by a successive approximation technique that took a huge amount of time to do. It was an extra credit problem that the professor was doing for fun.
I was sick that night and I realized my ability to get the usual 100 percent was off. I could not think very well. So I cheated. I brought my mind to a manic high and my normal mind blanked out. So I was taken over by the spirit within me. I got the usual hundred and the extra ten points.
The Professor was shocked to see the correct answer and an equation that no one had ever seen before.
Without a creator God explanation, what produces this ability of mine to solve problems that others cannot solve? Does my inner mind connect with the fifth dimension? Does this inner mind operate at a much higher speed than my regular mind?
During the six hour 1956 electrical comprehensive exam in New York State, there were many 98 percent grades but only one 100 percent. I had turned on my hypomanic mind during that test.
In any event my hypomanic mind is limited to the amount of data I can present to it. So it does not know all the answers. Since it operates in the higher light speed dimension, it knows this to be true.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 14:01:51
Once we eliminate time the initial cause and effect is meaningless.
Kryptid: If that's true, then why do we observe cause and effect in everyday life?
GG: Cause and effect is the product of the big bang inversion. Before the inversion time was meaningless. I calculate a normalized cycle time of 1088 billion years. Yet once the material universe radiates away into nothing, the time clock is gone as if it never existed. All we have is photonic light speed Cs energy. It is a meaningless and quite stupid universe. From infinity we come to a pinpoint which is really a small surface sphere.
We must return from whence we came. We will return to stupidity. All human memory and intelligence will be gone. Then far into the future the clock will come back and an Einstein will appear. The religions of man will reappear. The scientists will reappear and someone like me will return. And someone like you will return as well. In the end man is eternal and the Gods of man are eternal. Fortunately we all die and our suffering ends. Yet there is a degree of enjoyment in life and I am lucky to have people to share life with.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 14:01:51
GG: It is two time dimensions or two light speed dimensions.
Time 1 = Distance / Light speed1 = meters/ meters per second = seconds
Time 2 = Distance/ Light speed 2
An object exists in time dimension 1 which is light speed 1 some of the distance it travels and in time dimension 2 some of the distance it travels. As more photonic energy is added to the object, it spends more of its distance traveled in time dimension 2. Thus it travels a shortened distance and its clock slows toward zero. Einstein’s formula is true but the object has traveled in two light speed or time dimensions.
Kryptid: And your evidence for this is... what, exactly?
GG: It is fortunate that when my boss gave me a problem to solve, I presented the solution and had the technicians build what I specified. He asked for no evidence. My solutions were all intuitive and they always worked. The things I designed sold to the government for over one million dollars each. They were happy although often I could not explain how they worked. Sorry I am not an evidence person.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 14:01:51
Science can never answer how the energy of the universe came into existence.
Kryptid: You don't know that.
GG: I have a good degree of confidence that some things will never be answered.
Quote from: jerrygg38 on Today at 14:01:51
GG: Scientists today are trying to build miniature black holes using laser beams. So at any day they may succeed in destroying the protons. Perhaps it will take 100 years. Perhaps only a few more years. Since other scientists are experimenting with Quantum entanglement, they may come to realize that we have a higher light speed dimension. In any event I look for physicists doing such things and offer my books to them. And some ask for an autographed copy. So I feed my ideas into some who do this type of work.
Kryptid: That didn't answer my question. What kind of experiment coming up empty would demonstrate that the idea is wrong?
GG: Sorry I have no ability to do what you ask. I am an intuitive problem solver. My dual mind seeks solutions and I present them. As new information comes in, my solutions change. I could be wrong for sure but this only modifies my solutions. It does not destroy them.