Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Wave Packets on 04/04/2020 17:19:13

Title: Is the Quantum/Classical boundary, Coherence VS Decoherence?
Post by: Wave Packets on 04/04/2020 17:19:13
Coherence is for quantum waves that can entangle, tunnel, and be in superposition. Decoherence is for physical/classical particles.

Somewhere around 50,000 bonded atoms will automatically be decohered. Anything smaller requires a decoherence event in its path to be classical.

If an object needs a decoherence event in its path to decohere, is it physical/real after the event? Is it still a group of wave packets, but only condensed now? Does it take around 50,000 bonded atoms to be physical particles? This explains why decohered particles can be influenced by the quantum field ..they are still waves. Decoherence is causing condensed wave packets that give the impression they are physical. Is decohered-condensed wave packets a new state of matter?

Are all quantum fields coherent? Is coherence the language of the unobservable? Is coherence the medium in which quantum waves propagate? Does coherence also exist in the future to flag decoherence events?

This is the Unified Theory.

Did we overlook one crucial detail about duality? Duality is not a physical/wave object. It is never physical, it is either waves or condensed wave packets (decoherence).

Decoherence and Wave collapse are not the same thing. Wave collapse is when a particle hits a physical object and dead stops. Decoherence is a particle being measured in flight and allowed to continue moving on its path. Decoherence now means all quantum particles are not physical/real.
Coherence is the state a wave has to be in to perform quantum weirdness events. Coherence is orderly waves.
Title: Re: Is the Quantum/Classical boundary, Coherence VS Decoherence?
Post by: Kryptid on 04/04/2020 17:24:40
Nice try, Pitts.