Naked Science Forum

General Discussion & Feedback => Just Chat! => Topic started by: Spam310720 on 31/07/2020 14:39:03

Title: Spam Hair Growth
Post by: Spam310720 on 31/07/2020 14:39:03
Spam Hair Growth Reviews: That sounds a lot like somebody sawing in a sack of wet chickens. That's how good it is for fanatics. I've put in a lot of research, hard work and time into longhair. But, "Trust no one." You know that you should do this deep down. While I follow that there is a portion of doubt theory germane to this I may admit to that well-known end. You should only concentrate on longhair. Some feedback from you would be appreciated so I might learn from my mistakes. There is no way pundits know what they're talking about on that spammy review.


 :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-*
Title: Re: Spam Hair Growth
Post by: alancalverd on 31/07/2020 23:10:33
It's true. Spam tends to favor the growth of hairy moulds rather than slime. The joys of a good education - I studied spam at least 3 times a week in the school refectory. We weren't allowed to take it into the labs in case it poisoned the rats.
Title: Re: Spam Hair Growth
Post by: chris on 02/08/2020 10:24:44
 ;D