Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: trevorjohnson32 on 04/08/2021 18:53:40
-
The electron starts with a shell which is composed entirely of the space medium. The shell is then filled with energy. The trapped wave of energy creates a barrier so when two atoms collide they bounce off each other. The electron is a sitting wave inside the atom, because it's sitting it doesn't emit light unless illuminated by excess energy. A sitting wave is like a frozen moment in time. Time dilation occurs when that wave is acted upon by gravity fields or movement.
-
when two atoms collide they bounce off each other
Quite often, they react.
So you must be wrong.
-
when two atoms collide they bounce off each other
Quite often, they react.
So you must be wrong.
Yes and they react
The squeezing of space at a standstill would cause that space to heat up, but because of the indivisible nature of the space medium, heat does not leak out. Only when effected by outside energy sources do the electrons light up to create color. There color is light at the wavelength of the trapped electron. The rest of the energy is shed off as heat which is local to a person.
-
Do you realise that the scientific description makes sense, and yours doesn't?
-
" It's not that electrons are destroyed. Rather, they are leaked away to distant points until none remain."
I guess they do dissipate outside the atom.
-
thought this was mind melting. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_(Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry)/Quantum_Mechanics/09._The_Hydrogen_Atom/Atomic_Theory/Why_atoms_do_not_Collapse
-
Hi.
thought this was mind melting......(link to libretext.org)....
Good for you. I hope you have many happy years studying science. It is interesting stuff.
I'm not sure how that article lead to your earlier comments and earlier posts but that probably doesn't matter.
Best wishes.
-
would cause that space to heat up
Space itself doesn't have a temperature. Only things in space have a temperature.
I guess they do dissipate outside the atom.
Electrons are stable. They don't dissipate. If they did, that would violate conservation laws.
-
Electrons are stable. They don't dissipate. If they did, that would violate conservation laws.
And your toaster wouldn't work.
-
Space itself doesn't have a temperature. Only things in space have a temperature.
I've been pondering temperature in my sci fi book I'm writing. I think the space medium when acted on by an expanding density of a wave becomes energy weight itself and the weight causes temperature spikes in that region or field. As for gravity fields being density on the space medium, shouldn't they cause heat as well? maybe they do at powerful levels?
-
I've been pondering temperature in my sci fi book I'm writing. I think the space medium when acted on by an expanding density of a wave becomes energy weight itself and the weight causes temperature spikes in that region or field.
Temperature is generally defined in terms of the average velocity of particles that make up a substance. Space isn't made of moving particles (so far as we know), so it doesn't have a temperature.
-
Electrons are stable. They don't dissipate. If they did, that would violate conservation laws.
And your toaster wouldn't work.
Mine doesnt. Damn those dissipating electrons!
-
I've been pondering temperature in my sci fi book I'm writing. I think the space medium when acted on by an expanding density of a wave becomes energy weight itself and the weight causes temperature spikes in that region or field.
Temperature is generally defined in terms of the average velocity of particles that make up a substance. Space isn't made of moving particles (so far as we know), so it doesn't have a temperature.
Space is funny, and I just got to sit back and laugh at how seriously you guys take me. But it seems obvious that a thermometer in space is going to read a different temperature at different distances from the sun. So it appears that space with a current of energy through it would be in a luminous state that does have weight and temperature.
-
That's because of the radiation, not because space itself has a temperature.
-
I just got to sit back and laugh at how seriously you guys take me.
How do we distinguish that from trolling?
-
That's because of the radiation, not because space itself has a temperature.
It sounds like you believe space has no properties at all? I think I speak of space differently. It is the medium for radiation and is therefore made up of that medium.
So do you think there's evidence the electron is a sitting wave? instead of a particle that zooms around the nucleus?
-
I've been pondering temperature in my sci fi book I'm writing.
That's fine, but please try to remember that this is a science site, not a fiction site.
Made-up nonsense isn't a "new theory"- it's a fairy tale.
-
It sounds like you believe space has no properties at all?
It's odd for you to conclude that, given that I never stated any such thing. I specified one thing that space does not have: temperature.
I think I speak of space differently.
Then please call it something else. If you use words with known, widely-accepted definitions in unconventional ways, you can cause confusion.
It is the medium for radiation and is therefore made up of that medium.
According to what evidence?
So do you think there's evidence the electron is a sitting wave? instead of a particle that zooms around the nucleus?
Electrons act as both waves and particles. It all depends on what you're measuring.
-
It's odd for you to conclude that, given that I never stated any such thing. I specified one thing that space does not have: temperature.
What do you believe then an aether or something?
-
It's odd for you to conclude that, given that I never stated any such thing. I specified one thing that space does not have: temperature.
What do you believe then an aether or something?
Did you somehow overlook the idea that Kryptid probably believes science?
-
What do you believe then an aether or something?
To date, I know of no good evidence for an aether.
-
That's because of the radiation, not because space itself has a temperature.
It sounds like you believe space has no properties at all? I think I speak of space differently. It is the medium for radiation and is therefore made up of that medium.
So do you think there's evidence the electron is a sitting wave? instead of a particle that zooms around the nucleus?
The electron is an elementary particle with both mass and negative charge. It unifies gravity and the EM force via this merger of two distinct force states into one particle that cannot be broken down any further. I should get a Nobel Prize in physics for this. The data had been there for many years but nobody wanted to say it out loud due to the expected reaction. It will mess up long standing traditions even if it makes things better and easier.
Electrons within atoms and molecules are under the Pauli Exclusion principle in that two same electron states cannot occupy the same orbital space. Two electrons need to have equal and opposite spin to occupy the same orbital. This allows the magnetic components of the EM force to add in a favorable way,
The EM force aspect of the electron is the wave nature of the electron, with each orbital having two EM waves that are 180 degrees out of phase. These waves can add but they will cancel, similar to two wave generators in a wave tank will cancel if they are 180 degrees out of phase. We get hidden EM wave energy that can be revealed, if we use the correct partition. In a wave tank if we add a piece of wood to the stillness of the cancelled wave, the waves will reappear on opposite sides.
With the electron waves hidden, what is left is the particle nature of the electron which is connected to its mass. The electron mass will bath in this hidden EM wave energy. Mass has the property of taking up space, and the space that is occupied by the opposite spin electrons is exclusionary space; implicit of its mass. Atoms have a distinct measurable size. This excluded mass-space has very specific shapes and geometries; S, P, D and F orbitals due to the space needs of the mass and momentum of the electrons.
Gravity can act on the electrons of atoms and molecules and reduce their space requirement, since gravity can and will act upon mass and will compact its space. This changing of space requirement of the electron mass will cause changes in the EM force that we see as new properties of new exotic materials.
For example, water at STP conditions has a density of 1 gm/cc, which is defined by the electrons. This is the space requirement of electron mass at ambient conditions. As the gravity induce pressures of the earth's increase, the water in the core of the earth is compressed to a density of over 5 gm/cc, and becomes a metal. The EM properties vary quite significantly based on the final electron mass space allotment and its impact on the EM force.
Let us approach this from the other way. Say we start with metallic water and impose the earth's magnetic field due to core's iron. This will impact the EM force of the negative charge in the metallic water. The unification of mass and negative charge should result in a alternation of the mass space requirement since we are adding EM energy. One such affect is the core of the earth rotates faster than the surface meaning the space requirement has gone up. The higher frequency of rotation is connected to the reciprocal of time and the second time vector of gravity. This impacts the frequencies of matter and energy.