Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Kartazion on 26/01/2022 18:54:46
-
Hi. Here my interpretation of this thought experiment quoted below:
Here is my new and original theory, published nowhere else, I call it The Illusion of Velocity Theory. Essentially, the theory is that light in one inertial frame of reference cannot have true velocity in another inertial frame of reference in relative motion to it unless the source is located in one and the receptor in the other. The perception that light has velocity in the inertial frame of an observer if both the source and receptor are in another inertial frame which is in motion relative to it is an illusion, thus, the title "The Illusion of Velocity Theory". If the source is in one frame and the receptor in another in motion relative to it, velocity can only be measured if the person measuring it knows the distance and time between the two, which is rarely the case, since those parameters would be constantly changing and the observer would need to be in contact with observers in the other frame to have the information required to define the parameters, so generally any perception of velocity of light, or anything else, in one frame from another in relative motion to it is illusory.
This postulate, or recognition of objective fact, happens to invalidate most, if not all, of Einstein's thought experiments involving inertial frames in motion relative to each other, because he doesn't appear to have taken those objective facts into account, they all seem to involve the perception of the velocity of light in one inertial frame from the viewpoint of another inertial frame which is in motion relative to it, as if the velocity exists in both frames, even though the source, receptor, and all parameters of velocity are located in only one of the two frames.
First I will give my definition of velocity: the quantification of motion based on the parameters of distance and time. Obviously I couldn't measure the velocity of a baseball being thrown from a pitcher to a catcher on a ball field from a moving car. How would I do that? I could obviously only do it on the ball field.
A similar situation occurs when I try to measure the velocity of light from a laser to a target, both being mounted on posts on the ground a certain distance apart, from a rocket traveling past them at, let's say, 150,000 km/s, for instance. Neither the laser nor the target are on the moving rocket so they do not have a particular velocity in the inertial frame of the rocket. Were I to make a rough estimate of the velocity of the laser beam, based merely on visual observation, I might think that it was moving at a velocity of only 150,000 km/s, because I and the rocket were moving at 150,000 km/s in the same direction. I might make the mistake of subtracting the velocity of the beam from my own velocity. That would be an example of "the illusion of velocity".
If the rocket were traveling in a direction opposite to the direction of the laser beam, I might make the mistake of adding my own velocity to that of the laser beam, concluding that its velocity was 450,000 km/s. That would be another example of "the illusion of velocity".
The laser beam actually had no particular velocity relative to me or the rocket, because it neither originated nor terminated in the rocket, and traveled no distance therein over any period of time therein, therefore it had no velocity in the rocket which could be measured in any way, it was an "illusion of velocity", if you will.
That, my friends, is the Illusion of Velocity Theory, accept it as valid or not, as you choose. It is my original theory, much like Special Relativity was Einstein's original theory, and this forum states that members are free to post their own original theories here, which would be appropriate to a forum section entitled "New Theories". If you find a logical fallacy in the Illusion of Velocity Theory, feel free to describe it.
The illusion is caused by the velocity of the particle. In other words, the displacement of the particle through the velocity intrinsically generates space and time in its frame reference.
We could refer to an oscillator to be able to interpret this. Indeed and in second quantification the contraction of the particle in its point of origin corresponds to the annihilation, until the expansion of the particle in space as a creation operator.
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/t-symmetry.png)
... Please only one preposterous, outlandish claim per thread.
It is the observational results that are outlandish, not their interpretations.
Proper time operator and its uncertainty relation https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03136866/document
Abstract
We study the quantum properties of an oscillator in proper time. This proper time oscillator is a particle model with mass that is on shell. Its internal time can be treated as a self-adjoint operator. The displaced time and displaced time rate of the oscillator obey an uncertainty relation resembling the one between position and momentum, which is different from the usual energy-time uncertainty relation. In addition, we demonstrate that a matter field with proper time oscillators satisfies the Klein–Gordon equation. It has the properties of a zero-spin quantum field. The formulations adopted permit a more symmetrical treatment between time and space in a matter field.
-
The illusion is caused...
It's not an illusion.
-
It's not an illusion.
So you affirmed by this that the creation is real and not illusory according to the interpretation of quantum mechanics?
-
interpretation of quantum mechanics?
What has QM got to do with it?
-
What has QM got to do with it?
Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason for the constitution of relativistic physics. So I take the interpretation at the source.
-
Proper time operator and its uncertainty relation https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03136866/document
Abstract
We study the quantum properties of an oscillator in proper time. This proper time oscillator is a particle model with mass that is on shell. Its internal time can be treated as a self-adjoint operator. The displaced time and displaced time rate of the oscillator obey an uncertainty relation resembling the one between position and momentum, which is different from the usual energy-time uncertainty relation. In addition, we demonstrate that a matter field with proper time oscillators satisfies the Klein–Gordon equation. It has the properties of a zero-spin quantum field. The formulations adopted permit a more symmetrical treatment between time and space in a matter field.
I - Proper Time and Secondary Time
If the proper time of the oscillator elapses between its two operators, namely between its point of origin (position A) and the matrix (position B) implies an intrinsic time thanks to the reiteration of the different position of the particle. The reiteration updates the previous density with the new density value. Thus the movement is created in a secondary time and only corresponds to part of the proper time of the oscillation. Here (https://sites.google.com/site/kartazion/explain-quantum-physics-with-a-single-particle-in-motion) is more detail what the point of origin is as well as its matrix of the oscillator described here.
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2019/11/anharmonic-oscillator-5.png)
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/kartazion-hologramme.png)
II - Time Dilation
Time dilation is a secondary time phenomenon that operates with the spherical size of the matrix.
This time dilation is the fact that when an object is formed on the high alternations of a spherical matrix, it will form less quickly than on the low alternations of the same matrix for one cycle. This dilation is not found on square or cubic matrices, but only on spherical matrices. The sweeping of the effective position from bottom to top, or from top to bottom, will form the objects more slowly on the upper part of the matrix, because the irrigation of the effective position on these lines is more important, and therefore take more time.
(effective position = formal presence of the particle)
______________
legend of the distribution of time granted from the effective position:
po = origin point = 0.0001ns (position A)
-> = flow = ~ 0s (distance between A and B)
point (n) = dot matrix = 1ns (position B)
(po–>point1–>po–>point2–>po–>point3–>) = ligne1 = ~3,0003ns
(po–>point4–>po–>point5–>po–>point5–>po–>point6–>po–>point6–>po–>point7–>) = ligne2 = ~6,0006ns
(po–>point8–>po–>point9–>po–>point10–>po–>point10–>po–>point11–>po–>point12–>) = ligne3 = ~6,0006ns
(po–>point13–>po–>point14–>po–>point15–>po–>point16–>po–>point17–>po–>point18–>) = ligne4 = ~6,0006ns
(ligne1 + ligne2 + ligne3 + ligne4) = cycle
cycle x frequency
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/dilatation-temps-1.png)
From the first to the last point of the complete object, will be formed in about 9ns (~ 9,0009ns) for one cycle. The total refresh of the matrix ends in about 21ns (~ 21,0021ns) for one cycle. Here if we continue this same matrix with additional lines to form a second object in the form of an identical triangle called object2, we have:
(po–>point1–>po–>point2–>po–>point3–>) = ligne1 = ~3,0003ns
(po–>point4–>po–>point5–>po–>point5–>po–>point6–>po–>point6–>po–>point7–>) = ligne2 = ~6,0006ns
(po–>point8–>po–>point9–>po–>point10–>po–>point10–>po–>point11–>po–>point12–>) = ligne3 = ~6,0006ns
(po–>point13–>po–>point14–>po–>point15–>po–>point16–>po–>point17–>po–>point18–>) = ligne4 = ~6,0006ns
(po–>point19–>po–>point20–>po–>point21–>po–>point22–>po–>point23–>po–>point24–>po–>point25–>) = ligne5 = ~7,0007ns
(po–>point26–>po–>point27–>po–>point28–>po–>point29–>po–>point29–>po–>point30–>po–>point30–>po–>point31–>po–>point32–>po–>point33–>) = ligne6 = ~10,0010ns
(po–>point34–>po–>point35–>po–>point36–>po–>point37–>po–>point38–>po–>point38–>po–>point39–>po–>point40–>po–>point41–>po–>point42–>) = ligne7 = ~10,0010ns
(po–>point43–>po–>point44–>po–>point45–>po–>point46–>po–>point47–>po–>point48–>po–>point49–>po–>point50–>po–>point51–>po–>point52–>) = ligne8 = ~10,0010ns
(ligne1 + ligne2 + ligne3 + ligne4 + ligne5 + ligne6 + ligne7 + ligne8) = cycle
cycle x frequency
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/dilatation-temps-2.png)
The object2 is formed around 13ns (~ 13,0013ns). Either the same object is about 4ns longer on the high lines of the matrix, than its double in ~ 9,0009ns on the low lines. The object2 on the upper part of the matrix is about 4ns older than its brother on the lower part. Because the effective position sweeps all the free positions end to end, it is logical to find in this case the extension of time when forming entirely identical objects. Subsequently we can understand that the movement of the object2 annihilates the scanning of the effective position, and thus the object2 is formed faster than if it remains motionless.
-
In conclusion, our universe is made up of a single moving particle.
It is said for all that:
Most astronomers believe the Universe began in a Big Bang about 14 billion years ago. At that time, the entire Universe was inside a bubble that was thousands of times smaller than a pinhead. It was hotter and denser than anything we can imagine. https://www.esa.int/kids/en/learn/Our_Universe/Story_of_the_Universe/The_Big_Bang
Inevitably the matter before the big bang would be reduced to a single particle of immeasurable total mass. The single particle. Moreover it is recognized that matter is made up of 99.999999% vacuum. It's because there is only one particle.
Everything coordinates with the single particle theory (https://sites.google.com/site/kartazion/explain-quantum-physics-with-a-single-particle-in-motion), as well as the following points can be explained with it:
- Tunnel Effect
- Singularity (Gravitational)
- Zero Point Energy
- Antimatter
- Neutrino
- Radiation Baryon/Boson
- Dark Matter
- Hawking Radiation
- Quantum ChromoDynamics
- CP & T symmetry
- Time Dilation
- Dark Energy
- Quantum Vacuum
- Quantum Superposition
- Paradox
- ... (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=82710.340)
-
The most difficult thing is to be able to admit that the universe works with only one particle in motion. This explains everything about the observations of quantum mechanics because of its strange and elusive phenomena.
-
Very simply and without difficulty of understanding ; Here are already five important points of quantum mechanics following the duplication of the particle:
In n°1 the duplication of the particle to explain quantum chromodynamics (the alternation of quarks) as well as in n°2 its quantum superposition states associated in n°3 with the paradox. In n°4 and from the mirror we have an asymmetry (the particle is either on one side or on the other; but not both at the same time (paradox)) where we can distinguish matter from antimatter follows in n°5 the CP spontaneous symmetry-breaking at 0.
(https://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_2019_12/1273311652_chromodynamic2.png.5073bc404593c589b620c835d1c4f032.png)
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2022/01/quantum-superposition-schrodinger-cat.png)
-
Are Electrons Point Particles?
We could say that the particle is the punctual definition of the mass. In reality, like the massless photon, the particle in quantum mechanics boils down to packet of energy. It should not be forgotten that the particle is "true" only during the observation, because otherwise the particle comes down to waves. A particle is a collapsed wave function due to observation.
This story is still something. Nature as we know it to our eyes is revealed when we observe it. This proves the fact that we are in a matrix. Indeed the 'schematic' representation of the particle is due to observation, whereas the wave is a probability which studies all the combinations (eg. superposition of quantum states) without using the particle. In conclusion the particle is not there (unless we observe it). Which is normal because a single moving particle cannot represent a whole structure point by point for nothing and only if you don't look at it. This would be a huge waste of extra time for the same holographically represented events. While the wave simulates events effortlessly, the observed requires a large amount of energy to be satisfied with the wave function collapse.
"I like to think the moon is there even if I am not looking at it.” — Albert Einstein
-
What has QM got to do with it?
Quantum mechanics is the underlying reason for the constitution of relativistic physics. So I take the interpretation at the source.
In Relativistic quantum chemistry, small adjustments were added to the Schrödinger wave equations used to model atoms; quantum mechanics. These small adjustments were based on Einstein's relativity. Quantum mechanics was first developed without relativity. The addition came many decades later, which means some of the math being used may be obsolete, since it did not change with the times. What is seen as uncertainty might be explained as frame differences in space-time due to relativity.
A good example of the updated adjustment for Quantum mechanics; Relativistic quantum mechanics, predicts that the unique color of the metal Gold is due to time dilation of the reflected light, due to the outer electrons of gold moving close the speed of light. This relativistic affect on the electrons, adds a yellow hue to any and all reflected light. This is not predicted by plane ole quantum mechanics.
It took some time to develop the tools needed to prove relativity, Quantum mechanics, on the other hand, had a head start and was evolving and growing during this wait period. It did not include what had not yet been proven. The adjustment addendum came much later in time.
If Relativity had been included from day one, it may have impacted the natural union of the two orientations. An overhaul may someday be needed. If we take into account relativistic affects, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle may be explainable, since two reference frames, instead of one, will play tricks. Quantum mechanics did not have this second frame consideration when it was developed, but assumes one reference. This is not easy to correct, with a finished version of a theory, since such change is resisted. Random may also not be as random as was originally thought.
-
In Relativistic quantum chemistry, ...
???
@puppypower I don't understand what you're saying. eg. Quantum mechanics explains the functioning of the atom and classical mechanics describes the behavior of the matter made of this atoms.
-
Relativistic quantum mechanics, predicts that the unique color of the metal Gold is due to time dilation
No, it doesn't.
Time dilation isn't the issue.
-
@puppypower I don't understand what you're saying.
Nor does he.
-
It took some time to develop the tools needed to prove relativity,
The precession of mercury (as predicted by relativity) was known long before Einstein's ideas.
The 1919 solar eclipse observations are regarded as one of the first "proofs" of relativity.
The uncertainty principle which underlies much of QM was not published until 1927.
-
_________
Mutating quantum particles set in motion... Here's how to go from pseudoscience to real physical explanation:
In the world of fundamental particles, you are either a fermion or a boson but a new study from the University of Cambridge shows, for the first time, that one can behave as the other as they move from one place to another. https://phys.org/news/2022-02-mutating-quantum-particles-motion.html
(https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/hires/2022/mutating-quantum-parti.jpg)
-
Here is my explanation for dissociating bosons from fermions on 21/07/2021 04:40:40
I wish to continue the explanation of the gravitational oscillator a little further while waiting to complete the functionality of the graviton.
In the gravitational oscillator that I present, there are two types of radiation. First there is the vertical radiation, called fermionic, either the oscillation of the particle from bottom to top and from top to bottom; And there is horizontal radiation, or bosonic radiation. For fermionic radiation and with the example of lepton we have a movement of the particle from bottom to top in the oscillator which allows to transport an electric charge to the surface of the energy sea. In the opposite direction, either from top to bottom the particle goes back in neutrino, either with a neutral charge.
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/gravitational-oscillator-radiation-fermion.png)
In this model there is a very strong link between energy and electric charge by potential difference, and the neutrino and gravity.
The charge deposited by potential difference at the surface of the energy sea will then be a component part of the matter for an ephemeral moment t after the following charge has been consumed.
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/gravitational-oscillator-radiation-photon-gif.gif)
(https://kartazion.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/gravitational-oscillator-radiation-gluon.png)
Vertical radiation = Fermionic matter = particle
Horizontal radiation = Bosonic matter = wave
It must be understood that I take all the points described in this post very briefly. The basis is simply stipulate to dissociate bosons and fermions. Explaining this post exhaustively would take more pages. You can always ask me what you don't understand. It will be with pleasure.
I conclude that quantum mechanics testifies by its phenomena of how the single particle works.
Source: https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=82710.msg648022#msg648022
-
...
Vertical radiation = Fermionic matter = particle
Horizontal radiation = Bosonic matter = wave
The definition of particle or wave is not important except for calculations. Indeed this distinction between particle and wave is done rather and according to a measurement causing a quantum decoherence. Clearly everything is a wave up to the measurement that generates the particle by collapse of the wave function.