Hi.
I have to go along with the sub-text presented by @The Spoon and @evan_au .
Is this animal welfare activity a charity? If even a small portion of the income it generates goes to one person then it's not exactly what most of us would consider as a charity. As such it may not be appropriate to make recommendations or discuss it further on this forum.
Also, is this really an advert for "John Smith PLC" who has the ability to thoroughly corrupt what Wikipedia was originally intended to do? That's not something I would like to continue discussing either.
Wikipedia is great when you type "Laser" because you get articles that describe the nature of a laser. It would be terrible if it just produces a list of shops selling lasers.
Finally, Wikipedia does not require a professional writer and the notion that English isn't your friends preferred language is almost completely irrelevant. Wikipedia seems to support hundreds of different languages. The hope and general aim is that someone with some language skills and time to spare, together with some automated translation software, will translate articles to the different language versions in the fullness of time.
...Written collaboratively by largely anonymous volunteers, anyone with Internet access and in good standing can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles (except in limited cases where editing is restricted to prevent disruption or vandalism). ... It currently has more than sixty million articles in more than 300 languages... [Taken from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About ]
Best Wishes.