The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of sunshaker
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - sunshaker

Pages: [1] 2
1
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What do we visualise when we think about the expansion of the Universe?
« on: 31/07/2017 20:33:55 »
Quote from: yor_on on 30/07/2017 15:04:54
I'll stir the pot too :)

Do you mean expanding 'inside' or 'outside'?
Who's the 'observer'?
We are the observers, we stand between above & below
I see this universe, as a quark within a proton, (proton = multiverse), meaning we are walking talking, multi-versal entities.


2
Chemistry / Re: What is your favourite element in the periodic table?
« on: 13/07/2017 19:12:22 »
Mendelevium z101, it is my birth element, 6/12/1964, 6+12+19+64= z101 Mendelevium.
Depending on your birth element, explains why you bond or react to others.

next I would say Hydrogen, but It is not the element that is my favourite, it is the stand alone PROTON.

 

 

3
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: In quantum mechanics, does the observation preceed the event?
« on: 18/06/2015 19:30:37 »
Atomic-s I've only skimmed trough thread, is this the experiment you are trying to explain?

http://www.sciencealert.com/reality-doesn-t-exist-until-we-measure-it-quantum-experiment-confirms?utm_content=bufferdc7d6&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Quote
They then randomly added a second grating that recombined the paths, but only after the atom had already passed the first grating.

When this second grating was added, it led to constructive or destructive interference, which is what you'd expect if the atom had travelled both paths, like a wave would. But when the second grating was not added, no interference was observed, as if the atom chose only one path.

The fact that this second grating was only added after the atom passed through the first crossroads suggests that the atom hadn't yet determined its nature before being measured a second time.

4
New Theories / 16% matter 84% dark matter?
« on: 30/05/2015 11:32:04 »
I have been messing about with my extended periodic table for a few years (z1 to z172). Believing they could possibly tie the atomic to the quantum, Which I now see as top quarks.http://alpha-omega-sunshaker.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/top-quark-condensate.html

Recently I was looking at the naturally occurring elements z1 to z92, I added up the protons in these elements 4232 then I added up the remaining known protons + what I believe are the positrons/super symmetric particles(in red) to these protons which came to 25444 this gave me a ratio of 16% matter to 84% dark matter/super symmetric particles,
Quote
dark matter is estimated to constitute 84.5% of the "total matter" in the Universe,   http://en.wikipedia....iki/Dark_matter
Periodic tables shown in link.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tOtpzG1WlM8/VPoBgnaWE0I/AAAAAAAACWo/JCJW91r5LpQ/s1600/92%2Bnatural%2Belements.png


5
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 11/02/2014 22:13:44 »
A star is born  http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/opposing-elementsdna1.xls

6
New Theories / Re: IF STARS WHERE ELECTRONS?
« on: 26/01/2014 21:19:29 »
I believe our universe is an electron, And all what we know of in our universe are "The smaller divisions that make up an electron". Has i am trying to show in this thread: http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=46408.0,
 
I did not say that "stars are electrons" and i know all about "protons and neutrons", And that other stars are no longer fusing hydrogen but other higher elements helium/carbon/oxygen etc until they start to fuse iron which signals there death/birth.
But i was recently reading on single celled organisms which made me think these organisms where like there own little universes,
So i thought without going too deep into the physics of an atom, More as a thought experiment what elements/molecules could be made from different star clusters/system and as you say  "a sextuplet system even for one of the most basic elements", So that's one basic element from a sextuplet system, Now for the rest of our universe?
And do we really know the extent to which stars are joined into "systems"? 

7
New Theories / IF STARS WHERE ELECTRONS?
« on: 24/01/2014 17:41:04 »

As i believe our universe is but an electron and everything is within everything (fractal levels),

There are roughly between 10 to the power of 21to24 stars in our universe,
There are roughly 7 to the power of 27 atoms in a human body,

I was wondering if every star equals an electron, A single star system being hydrogen, A double system equals helium, Triple lithium etc,
With all the star systems in "our universe" equaling electrons/atoms/molecules, what sort of physical property/entity do you think they could form?

8
Marine Science / Re: help to identify this picture.
« on: 20/01/2014 21:54:02 »
Thanks RD, I would never of guessed it was a carnivorous plant, as well as being home to single celled organisms,
Also great gallery, Plenty there to get me thinking. Cheers.

9
Marine Science / Can you help to identify this picture?
« on: 20/01/2014 10:21:53 »


I recently came across this picture which i saved, I don't know what it is but what to find some more information on it.
It is saved has "scivis 1" but when i google it i only find a visualization school.

I was interested in the shapes in what i believe is in it's mouth,

Thank you.

 

10
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 03/01/2014 12:38:24 »
Shown here are 2 groups the alkali metals with 1 electron valence shell, Also nobles with 8 electron valence shell each is its own space but each fits within each, as do the other groups 3,4,5,6,7 valence shells,

Then in the bottom table i have shown all groups within each other, This is how i see "expanding space",
The red/yellow areas are what i believe to be what we call "dark matter", We exist within the flow of the lower element space(white/grey/blue/green) goldilocks zone.

http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/grouped-space-ptable-comp1.xls

BEST VIEWED IN SMALLEST MAGNIFICATION.

EDIT: Updated http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/grouped-space-ptable-comp-ha-alk-8correcteda.xls

11
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 01/01/2014 12:58:10 »


Quote from: ScientificSorcerer on 30/12/2013 06:22:06

I personally have a radically different idea of what the fabric of the universe is. I believe it is a superconducting super fluid,

At the moment i am trying to tie everything together, As i believe our universe is an electron expanding out to the next shell, It means every electron within us is a universe, we are within everything and everything is within us,
We are multi-universal beings, as you say you believe our universe to be a superconducting fluid, We humans are mainly fluid, The human superconductor, https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CC8QtwIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DphmFjCjIYZc&ei=LPzDUpb1A5CS7Ab55YHwDQ&usg=AFQjCNF5_6IBPRepANW_8nFCJqui2BlUFw&sig2=yvJvYddyZBt5aJpOPJdTcw&bvm=bv.58187178,d.ZG

It all depends on how and where we view the "universe" from. To me everything is within.
Once this is realised distance will have little meaning, As we could travel to any time/universe or place in this universe by travelling inwards, which many already do without realizing, some may call it "dreams/astral",

We are still at a early time in our development as a race, We are going through our technology phase where we believe tech holds all the answers, It is a stage all early civilizations go through. Also why we do not hear from higher species as they no longer exist/reside within our "physical dimension".

12
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 27/12/2013 18:25:19 »
Update showing the balance between "Noble Space", Also how Emerium/Element 172 connects.


DNA The cosmic man

http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/noble-fabric-space1a-cosmic-man.xls

13
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Expanding universe
« on: 10/12/2013 10:20:25 »
How can we be sure the earth us and our measurements are not also expanding including quantum levels,
Perhaps a cm a billions of years ago would measure only a millimetre now. If everything expands(including our measurements) we have no reference point. "similar to up/down in space",
When we look to a distance, all objects seem smaller, Perhaps this is the same with time.

relative to us the distant earth may have been football size, And in our distant future may be the size of our sun but everything else would also be expanded so we would never know.

14
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 29/11/2013 11:29:26 »
Here i have 4 tables of joined elements http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/grouped-elements-old-quarkstargalaxyuniv.xls

In table 1, I followed the electron sequences to work out each elements sequence, a few elements did not follow this sequence, Iron being one the sequence shows iron should be 2 8 8 8 but it is 2 8 14 2,
Also must note palladium which in my electron seq is 2 8 18 17 1 which balances between each joined table, But we believe its seq to be 2 8 18 18 having 5 shells the fifth being 0,

In table 2 you will see a balance between the tables, each centre also as a balance shown in pink,

In table 3 you will see shown in "purple" what is believed to be the sequence of each element at this present time, These have detoured from the original sequence, only where it is shown in purple is it slightly different to the sequence, A place of changing energies, A expansion from within,

In table 4 you will notice the "expansion in purple" happens where the opposing alkali metals join(blue), the expansions will carry on until the opposing elements rebalance to Emerium172  2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2 +"1". Emerium+ 1fractal hydrogen,
Then shown in green are the fractal hydrogen which produces the element Emerium 2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2.

15
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 15/11/2013 11:12:20 »
I have been thinking about the alkali metals,

I realise these are the only elements that overlap each joining table, They overlap by 1 electron, having 1 foot in each opposing table.

They can only be found naturally in "salts", never as a free element, Because they are not completely "natural" to any table, existing between the "tables".

Is this the "fuse" touch paper, that sets of each expansion.

ALKALI METALS SHOWN IN BLUE, http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/grouped-elements-allaafexpansion-ud.xls

You will notice each alkali metals electron sequence ends in 1, this sequence also runs diagonal from each element, through each joined table as shown in bottom chart.


16
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 24/10/2013 18:12:45 »
I have come up with a Simple Formula showing how each "table" joins.

Each Z WITH A CIRCLE REPRESENTS A COMPLETE TABLE FROM Z1>Z172 The circle represents the place of hydrogen in each table.


  Formula


The expanding fractal multiverse.

expansions within expansions.


 http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/grouped-elements-allaafex.xls showing how tables are joinned. in the bottom chart you will see the beginning of a "wave structure" this "wave" passes through the above structure 042.

17
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 03/10/2013 16:27:04 »
Elements only reflect where we are within this current expansion,

As we know noble elements have 8 electrons in their valence shells, Nobles are sandwiched between a halogen and a alkali metal, one wanting to give up a electron and one wanting an electron, as shown in table,
I have come to realise there are many levels of expansion and the elements reflect where we are within this expansion,
Within this table you will see each noble shown in yellow sandwiched between a halogen/alkali metal, you will see these expand within Emerium element172 electron seq 2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2 also shown in yellow,
You will also notice in green/blue other elements that when condensed/expanded(earlier/later stages of expansion)are halogens/nobles/alkali elements, it is relative to where we are within said "universal expansion".
example
PRESENT 2 8 13 2
MN 25
past/future 2 8 8 7

PRESENT 2 8 14 2
IRON 26
past/future2 8 8 8

PRESENT 2 8 15 2
COBALT 27
past/future 2 8 8 8 1
Everything expands within Emerium, there are expansions within expansions, the elements reflect where we are now within this expansion, Elements are not stand alone particles, everything is connected to everything.
http://scienceforums.com/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_id=3741
Once you realise the stages of expansion it is possible to work out where we are within this "universe expansion",

 
 


http://scienceforums.com/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_id=3743

Showing the halogen/nobles/alkali metals/alkaline earth metals and how the expand between the "tables" and how they fit together, You will see how hydrogen behaves like an halogen and fits within that group.
Also how element 120 as been theorised may or may not be an alkaline earth metal, but here fits into that group.

You will see there are 11 of these groups/expansions (Mtheory/supergravity). There are expansions from each of these 11 groups that expand through each other group,

Each element as an opposeing element, You will notice that the lower elements hydrogen/helium etc have a superheavy opposing element which exerts more outside force upon said elements, the higher we go up our periodic table the less the opposing force upon each element. This gives the sense of weight/gravity.

We have to realise "elements" are not stand alone particles, Everything connects to everything.



A good table of elements and electron sequences, and information on all know groups/elements http://www.ptable.com/
 

18
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases?, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)Electron-Multiverse
« on: 21/09/2013 15:17:10 »
Geometric Noble Space/StarDavid
Emerium Element 172/Noble 12/ electron seq 2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2
http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/new-grid-emerium-star1ab.xls

Showing how every element(everything) expands within Emerium, Emerium encases Emerium,
Showing the structure of Emerium and how it rebalances itself, you will see it has the same structure as "star david", It makes up the fabric of space/time, Forever expanding on the fractal levels, 
It is the expansion through Emerium, that we get all the combinations of the elements, starting with hydrogen up to the higher elements back to hydrogen,
Our universe is an expanding atom of Emerium expanding within Emerium.

19
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases? element 12, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)
« on: 19/07/2013 12:38:31 »
SUPERSYMMETRY?

I have been looking into supersymmetry and have realised in most supersymmetric models is the exsistance of a multipicatively conserved quantum number called R-parity and each ordinary particle is assigned R=-1, This number implies  that supersymmetric particles must be created or destroyed in pairs and that the lightest (LSP) is stable.
As i have shown when two tables join you get Emerium +1hydrogen=2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2+1

This releases 1h you then have blocks of emerium that then joins with another block of emerium=
2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2+2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2= emerium within emerium plus 2 fractal hydrogen=( 1+1 2 2 8 8 18 18 32 32 50 50 32 32 18 18 8 8 2 2 1+1)
It is the joining of these elements that create this "pair of fractal hydrogen(lsp)" which contain all that as gone before/ The building blocks/cells of the  next cycle of expansions/universe/dimension.

http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/period-table-element-expandedtwindaanoblextended1111.xls

Which i will show better soon. hopefully.


20
New Theories / Re: 12 noble gases? element 12, 172 periodic table (god particle/higgs)
« on: 07/06/2013 12:15:03 »
I have come to realise at this present time in our expansion, We are expanding through a Neon/Sodium universe,

Each expansion overlaps the previous expansion,

You will see how the two tables/elements join, with each opposing elements making Emerium+1 hydrogen=2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2+1 Which opens up many possibilites.

Emerium+Emerium 2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2 2 +2 8 8 18 18 32 32 18 18 8 8 2 =
1+1 2 2 8 8 18 18 32 32 50 50 32 32 18 18 8 8 2 2 1+1 which is emerium within emerium + 2 fractal hydrogen which become the next building blocks/cells.

There is always a balance, everything is within everything, It just depends where you look from.



But it is when you realise each noble element is opposed by a alkali element which are the volatile elements, this is where the reactions take place, this is where the expansions begin,

You will notice the opposing tables balance out at elements 86radon/87francium, and all elements expand out from here.

But there are expansions within expansions, and we are part of the NEON/SODIUM EXPANSION.

You will notice there are 11expansions through the neon/alkali elements, each of these is a overlapping dimension/universe, which is why we have trace elements of previous expansions within us, Mtheory/string theory predict 11 dimensions.

Each noble as a opposeing alkali, you will notice the last noble element 172/emerium as hydrogen as it opposeing element, shown in blue, this is where it joins to the next building blocks, and sets off new expansions,
 
Expansions within expansions containning all that as gone before.

HYDROGEN/EMERIUM>EMERIUM/HYDROGEN


http://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/period-table-element-expandedtwindaanoblextended1111.xls
Which is shown in the bottom five tables.

View 1st in smallest magnification.

Also a good periodic table with information on each element http://www.ptable.com/

Some may of read, of the increase of cancers, this is due to our continious expansions, on the microscopic level, within our cells, we are expanding from within.

NOTHING DIES, NOTHING DECAYS, WE ARE EXPANDING TO A DIFFERENT STATE OF AWARENESS/BEING.

Pages: [1] 2
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.124 seconds with 66 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.