Stating a fact isn't spamming.So just because it is beyond your own personal level of comprehension , it is nonsense ? What sort of logic is that ?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
You are such a troll at times , why do you bother ? Do you think in some way you upset me ? That is quite laughable Mr C if you do .I sometimes think you are one of these Turin tests as you never seem to have any ability to think . Your replies don't focus on anything that's been explained , you just say it's nonsense or wrong based on your subjective opinion .
The reality is that there is a chance there is an imperceptible aether , the earths oblate shape suggests the earth is pushing ''down'' on something , the earths own field also allowing energy propagation .
You do not have great vigour in your thoughts Mr C , perhaps you should admit I am the far superior thinker than yourself ?
More of the same junk.
More of the same junk.I sometimes think you are one of these Turin tests as you never seem to have any ability to think . Your replies don't focus on anything that's been explained , you just say it's nonsense or wrong based on your subjective opinion .
And you really need to get to grips with the fact that the Ether Theory died over a hundred years ago.I've resurrected the arc of the covenant and inside the power is divided by two , however hell raiser will warn you not to open the box because you'll get burned badly .
In reality glass impedes light.In reality the aether impedes us kE but it is unnoticeable . You admit the earth emits a field and this field measures 0 net charge right ?
So, once again, do you post it because you think it means something, or are you being deliberately unclear?
I've explained several times before but I suppose I'll explain again . If we took single dimension of space and gave it a length x , a linearity , this linearity will have the properties of a spatial field and 0 net charge . x is a binary interwoven fabric of a+b .Yes, science has to be clear.OK, so it's poetry, rather than science.Well it isn't opera , you do know the difference between science , poetry and opera don't you ?
And since you ruled out opera, I must be right; you are creating poetry.
Why not try actually explaining what you mean?
By the way, your equation (0Q/2 = Q) would always result in an answer of zero. Zero is in the numerator, and anything multiplied by zero is zero. Pretty pointless if it always gives the same answer no matter what value you put in for Q.There is no multiply , 0Q is one thing not 0*Q
That means if you were to take a quantum field of 0 net charge and divide this quantum field by 2 , you would split space and time creating an electrical charge measure .=Q
Would you like to explain what that's meant to mean?
In particular, that equation is wrong.
No.I'm really so astutely minded that I can spot bull when I see it.However, if you are still trying to claim that it is meaningful, you would do better if you tried to explain it than by trying to criticise me.You extract information like a juicer extracts juice ...hmmm.
Do you not even know how LIGO works?I know of LIGO , it uses light . Perhaps you can explain the method in full and simple terms ?
We looked really carefully, and it isn't there.If there was some ether which could affect LIGO then it would also affect the MM experiment.There wasn't one.Maybe you didn't look carefully enough ...especially seems as the earth emits an aether field . You don't seem to have much scientific vigour ?
Are you really that mediocre minded and clueless you don't understand that ?Additionally you now may understand a N-field particle and a N-field . A N-field particle is denser than a N-field , a N-field is denser than space .
N-field particle = atom
N-field = spatial fields /aether
Why do you post word salad like that?
Are you genuinely under the delusion that it means something, or are you being deliberately unclear?
Maybe it's a specific polarity or wavelength and/or frequency that sets it off . Anyway , I'm glad you recognise the neutral of waves , you should now recognise why a field aether would also have to be neutral . If it were not neutral it would impose a force on the neutral binary electromagnetic waves . A positive charged ''wave'' would propagate through space slower than a neutral wave because the positive of the aether binary would push back creating a resistance force .Unknowingly it is
If it was, electromagnetic waves would be setting it off all the time and the device wouldn't be able to tell the difference between waves from local sources and those from colliding neutron stars/black holes light-years away.its set up to detect gravitational waves which are electrostatic neutrally charges waves
All electromagnetic waves are already neutral. Electromagnetic waves don't cause the fluctuations in mirror distance that Einsteinian gravitational waves do. They cannot be responsible for LIGO's detections.
Not at all , consider how the positive charge of an interwoven binary field would push back a positive charge strike to amplify the strike .Newtons third law and Coulombs law.You do realise that a positive and/or negative charged gravitational wave can be observed as lightning ?Nonsense.
you should stop using the word ostensible because it makes look foolish.But that's the correct word , it appears to be true but on close inspection , it turns out not to be true .