So can you please offer the calculation /estimation for the magnetic force?QuoteWhy our scientists didn't try to calculate/evaluate the magnitude of the Magnetic field?Who said they didn't?
What kind of magnetic force can boost that kind of molecular jet stream?
Please remember there are about 10,000 solar mass in that beam, the molecular is boosted at a speed of 0.8c to a high of 27,000 light years away from the accretion disc.
If we know the level of the magnetic field around the SMBH, would you kindly offer it?
(gravity coming from the black hole and magnetism coming from the disk).Why are you so sure that magnetism is coming from the disk?
Do we really know how SMBH works?
Do we know if the matter in the that SMBH rotates or not?
It seems to me that the accretion disc by itself can't produce the requested magnetism level.
In order to set magnetism, we normally need a rotational core. For example, the Earth produce magnetism due to its core rotation. Therefore, I'm not sure that an orbital rotation disc by itself can create any significant magnetism or even any sort of magnetism. If you have an example that supports your claim - please offer it.
In any case, even if it the accretion disc can produce some sort of magnetism it surly might be too weak to support that kind of molecular jet stream of 10,000 solar mass up to 27,000 light year and that is boosted at 0.8c.
Don't forget that the total mass in the accretion disc is only three sun mass.
I see it differently.
The 4 millions solar mass at the core of the SMBH sets the magnetic force.
It rotates (as the core of the earth) and sets the ultra magnetic force around the SMBH.
Therefore, A SMBH with an accretion disc will generate the same magnetism amplitude as identical SMBH without any accretion disc.
However, the accretion disc has a key function. It acts as a rotor under magnetic field (generator).
As it orbits under the magnetic field of the SMBH, an Ultra high current is flowing in its matter.
This increases it's temperature and converts it into plasma.
Therefore, we call the matter in the accretion disc - plasma (it gets to ultra high temp of 10^9). The orbital velocity by itself can't generate that kind of temp.
Without the magnetic field of the SMBH, there will be no current in the accretion disc.
Without the current flow, it might be an impossible mission to achieve that high level of temperature
Actually, we can compare it to plasma that we create in order to cut metal
"Plasma cutting is a process that cuts through electrically conductive materials by means of an accelerated jet of hot plasma."
"OSHA recommends a shade 8 for arc current less than 300 A"
So, we are using very high current to set the plasma. In the same token, the ultra high current in the accretion disc converts the matter in the accretion disc into plasma.
I wonder why our scientists didn't even thought about it.
However, this high current sets an Electric field.
So, the contribution of the accretion disc is that it creates an Electromagnetic field around the SMBH.
(1) The polarity of a magnetic field is north and south, not positive and negative (this is important to distinguish it from an electric field).As I have stated, around the SMBH there is electromagnetic force. Therefore it is a combination of magnetic and electric fields.
Magnetic fields have no effect at all on stationary electric charges.A new created pair of particle must move at ultra high speed.
Therefore, we can't consider them as stationary electric charges.
We must evaluate them based on their speed in the first moment of creation under the electromagnetic fields and Lorentz force.