The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of afksf1944
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - afksf1944

Pages: [1] 2
1
New Theories / Re: Is light speed independent of observer?.
« on: 17/08/2019 09:04:42 »
What I meant is:-
Light speed is only dependent on permeability and permittivity which are constant in any given medium, Hence, light speed is constant in any medium and independent of observers as speed of reference.

2
New Theories / Is light speed independent of observer?.
« on: 10/08/2019 21:53:48 »
(I posted this on Quora, I am posting it here for more audience and feedback).

Space is full of photons moving in all directions at C speed relative to space time in all space time locations.

 so, moving observer is only changing space time location.

3
New Theories / Re: Is this right
« on: 05/07/2019 10:29:46 »
I can now see where I went wrong. The volume involved is the original volume of the mass converted and not the volume contributed to space.
I would like to thank all those involved for their valuable contribution.

4
New Theories / Re: Is this right
« on: 04/07/2019 21:24:23 »
Quote from: afksf1944 on 04/07/2019 20:09:16
And everywhere  else- where mass is not being converted to energy- the formula does not apply.How could it?

The formula should apply in all cases where high energy is generated as a result of nuclear reaction when mass conversion takes place because it is derived from such circumstances.
There may be other formulas applying in other circumstances.

5
New Theories / Re: Is this right
« on: 04/07/2019 20:09:16 »
Quote from: afksf1944 on 04/07/2019 16:23:56
Yes.And  the formula does not apply to anything else.
            
            
We are only considering a mass converting into energy here. This energy is then converted to space. We are talking about Energy to Space transformation. The formula generally indicates that space is a product of energy conversion.and energy is a product of mass conversion. 

6
New Theories / Re: Is this right
« on: 04/07/2019 16:23:56 »
V is proportional to E and inversely proportional to d. An object with higher  d has higher E and hence the comparison you made is not accurate

7
New Theories / Re: Is this right
« on: 04/07/2019 10:56:54 »
Quote from: afksf1944 on 03/07/2019 18:48:39
It's clear by dimensional analysis. You can't say "mass is greater than volume."1 kilogram of water is equal to 1 litre of water (very nearly)1 tonne of water is greater than 1 litre of water1 gram of water is less than 1 litre of water.So mass is numerically greater, less, or the same depending on what units you use.It's like comparing apples and oranges.

The formulas I used are well known, tested and confirmed. No one can argue about them. They do show that' space is the result of mass / energy conversion and that is why the universe is expanding. The space converted is governed by relativity.

8
New Theories / Re: Is this right
« on: 03/07/2019 18:48:39 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/07/2019 18:36:33
Volume and density of what?
of the mass converted

Quote from: afksf1944 on 03/07/2019 18:34:29
Not generally.
how can this be proved?

9
New Theories / Is this right
« on: 03/07/2019 18:34:29 »

Is this right?
How space is made;
 E=mc^2,
 m=vd (v=volume, d=density),
 E=vdc^2,
 therefore v=E/(dc^2),
 i.e. mass>>energy>>space (v)       
     mass to space conversion.   


                       E = mc^2 was confirmed by experiment.                   

10
New Theories / Re: Can the theory of relativity be applied to photons?
« on: 21/04/2019 12:53:45 »
evan_au
Thank you for your much appreciated explanation. I must admit, after reading your description, I realised that my knowledge now is well out of date. I was qualified in 1974. I have to work hard to update my knowledge.

11
New Theories / Re: Can the theory of relativity be applied to photons?
« on: 21/04/2019 08:24:22 »
Quote from: afksf1944 on 20/04/2019 12:00:49
Based on what information?
Electrons orbit the atom at a certain speed to stay in their orbit just like the earth orbiting the sun to stay in its orbit.

When a photon is ejected by an atom, it moves at the speed of light.
 Unless influenced by space matter/forces, It will continue in motion in the original direction and at the same speed anywhere, at any time in space.

12
New Theories / Can the theory of relativity be applied to photons?
« on: 20/04/2019 12:00:49 »
Photons (light) speed, any where in space is always the same due to its atomic particle properties. If the speed is measured any time, any where in space at different locations by many observers moving at any speed from zero upwards in any direction, a constant speed is obtained (c).
Photons follow certain rules as other atomic particles do any where in space.
The speed of an electron orbiting the atom is the same every where in space measured by many observers at many locations and moving at any speed in any direction.
The theory of relativity cannot be applied in some cases and for certain things such as these.

13
New Theories / Re: How does light travel in space? Is it a particle or a wave?Hi Evan
« on: 16/04/2019 22:52:15 »
Hi Evan.
It is not the size of the holes in the space fabric I was talking about. In fact I assumed that the holes were minute and they were evenly distributed.
It was the frequencies of the photons trying to travel through space. The amplitudes of the waves is not a factor in the process of travel. The only factor is the wavelength.
If the wavelength is long, the photon can be assumed to be travelling in a straight line and can pass through any vertical hole depending on wave amplitude and so acting as a particle. Similarly if the wavelength is very short, the above behaviour applies.
When the wavelength dictates that the photon is either just above or below the hole in the vertical row, of course it will collide and get absorbed.
I hope that this is a better explanation

I feel that the idea is a possibility and can one day be proved right. Please let me have your comments.

14
New Theories / Re: How does light travel in space? Is it a particle or a wave?Idid not say
« on: 16/04/2019 12:01:06 »
I did not say the missing frequencies are in the visible or none visible range. This will have to be investigated and proved just like any theory/prediction/conclusion.

15
New Theories / Re: How does light travel in space? Is it a particle or a wave?
« on: 16/04/2019 10:00:15 »
This is what you would expect out of a filter. Its a prediction/conclusion.
If you let a light with many frequencies hit a plane with many minute holes, some photons with certain wavelengths will not be able to pass through holes they reach on the plane, they just miss them. In space they enter a cube and have to go through two planes in any direction.

16
New Theories / How does light travel in space? Is it a particle or a wave?
« on: 15/04/2019 18:59:38 »
Light is composed of photons with frequencies from very low to very high. Those photons with a very low frequency and those with a very high frequencies almost behave like particles.
(Very high wavelength and very low wavelength photons travelling in any direction resemble particles moving in straight line)
   
Space fabric is full of minute holes acting as a filter in all three planes. The fabric material absorbs some photons on collision preventing them from passing through and as a result the fabric gains photons energy, expands accordingly and it cannot be seen. Only certain photons with certain frequencies can pass through.

Therefore, light travels as a wave and a particle and photons of certain frequencies are missing / cannot be detected.

17
New Theories / Re: Atomic battery idea
« on: 28/03/2019 11:16:34 »
Atoms can only accept certain number of electrons (clouds)

18
New Theories / Re: Can this be true description of black hole
« on: 24/03/2019 10:45:07 »
Can I explain this better?.
Due to the very strong magnetic waves / fields in the black hole region some molecules / atoms get excited and by returning to normal state they emit photons which under the influence of magnetic forces get ‘’pumped’’ to the centre of the black hole and compressed as new borne mass. This process of excitation and pumping keeps repeating and increasing the black hole density and mass.

However, some molecules / atoms get stripped of their electrons and due to the magnetic effect split into alpha, beta and gamma radiation, thus forming other types of atoms / molecules which get ‘’pumped’’ to the centre of the black hole increasing the black hole density and mass.
The black hole gets denser and heavier and eventually produces new planets / galaxies /  universe /plants and creatures …….etc.

19
New Theories / Re: Can this be true description of black hole
« on: 21/03/2019 11:17:53 »
Is it possible for both, mass to energy and energy to mass conversion processes to be executed in a black hole depending on certain conditions and the main process is energy to mass conversion?.

20
New Theories / Can this be true description of black hole
« on: 20/03/2019 21:17:13 »
A black hole is formed as a result of constructive interference of existing strong magnetic waves/fields at a certain point in space. This results in a very strong magnetic field which can attract any thing and every thing in the vicinity.
Magnetic fields are very well known for playing an important part in energy transformation from one kind to another. When they are extremely strong, they play part in the transformation of energy to mass.
Therefore, a black hole is a factory for converting energy to mass and eventually producing new planets/galaxies/universe/creatures..etc.

Pages: [1] 2
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.076 seconds with 63 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.