1

New Theories / Re: Is this relativity evasion?

« on: 20/03/2020 12:13:40 »

This is the new theories section where you can be wrong or right when describing your view.
Many scientists in the past made wrong statements or so was thought. Some were wrong and some were right.
when announcing your views, they sometimes cannot be believed and sometimes can be against known ideas or so called existing scientific facts. Now that is a bit of education for some.

2

New Theories / Re: Is this relativity evasion?

« on: 19/03/2020 21:40:50 »

Thanks for the much appreciated comments made.
What I actually meant by stating that the photons towards the observer (in the Z direction) are not detected is as follows:-
The photons from the light source in the z direction hitting the observer at c1 speed and reflected back at c1 speed when the observer is not moving relative to the light source. When the observer moves at a speed v  (say towards the light source) the photons will hit him at a speed c1+v and will be reflected back at a speed c1 +v-v (which is c1).
So in this case the photons relativity is not detected.

3

New Theories / Is this relativity evasion?

« on: 16/03/2020 20:49:34 »

 Consider a light source fixed in space XYZ. An observer facing plane y in z direction can only see photons from y plane moving in the direction x and y. Other planes are not visible and only the light speed of y plane in the direction of x or y can be measured at right angle to y and x. This of course will be constant (c1) for the medium used. If the observer or the light source moved at any speed towards or away from each other, no relative speed is detected due to the fact that the movement is perpendicular to y plane and the photons in y plane moving in the direction x and y.

4

New Theories / Re: Is light speed independent of observer?.

« on: 17/08/2019 09:04:42 »

What I meant is:-
Light speed is only dependent on permeability and permittivity which are constant in any given medium, Hence, light speed is constant in any medium and independent of observers as speed of reference.

5

New Theories / Is light speed independent of observer?.

« on: 10/08/2019 21:53:48 »

(I posted this on Quora, I am posting it here for more audience and feedback).

Space is full of photons moving in all directions at C speed relative to space time in all space time locations.

 so, moving observer is only changing space time location.

6

New Theories / Re: Is this right

« on: 05/07/2019 10:29:46 »

I can now see where I went wrong. The volume involved is the original volume of the mass converted and not the volume contributed to space.
I would like to thank all those involved for their valuable contribution.

7

New Theories / Re: Is this right

« on: 04/07/2019 21:24:23 »

And everywhere  else- where mass is not being converted to energy- the formula does not apply.How could it?

The formula should apply in all cases where high energy is generated as a result of nuclear reaction when mass conversion takes place because it is derived from such circumstances.
There may be other formulas applying in other circumstances.

8

New Theories / Re: Is this right

« on: 04/07/2019 20:09:16 »

Yes.And  the formula does not apply to anything else.
            
            

We are only considering a mass converting into energy here. This energy is then converted to space. We are talking about Energy to Space transformation. The formula generally indicates that space is a product of energy conversion.and energy is a product of mass conversion. 

9

New Theories / Re: Is this right

« on: 04/07/2019 16:23:56 »

V is proportional to E and inversely proportional to d. An object with higher  d has higher E and hence the comparison you made is not accurate

10

New Theories / Re: Is this right

« on: 04/07/2019 10:56:54 »

It's clear by dimensional analysis. You can't say "mass is greater than volume."1 kilogram of water is equal to 1 litre of water (very nearly)1 tonne of water is greater than 1 litre of water1 gram of water is less than 1 litre of water.So mass is numerically greater, less, or the same depending on what units you use.It's like comparing apples and oranges.

The formulas I used are well known, tested and confirmed. No one can argue about them. They do show that' space is the result of mass / energy conversion and that is why the universe is expanding. The space converted is governed by relativity.

11

New Theories / Re: Is this right

« on: 03/07/2019 18:48:39 »

Volume and density of what?

of the mass converted

Not generally.

how can this be proved?

12

New Theories / Is this right

« on: 03/07/2019 18:34:29 »

Is this right?
How space is made;
 E=mc^2,
 m=vd (v=volume, d=density),
 E=vdc^2,
 therefore v=E/(dc^2),
 i.e. mass>>energy>>space (v)       
     mass to space conversion.   


                       E = mc^2 was confirmed by experiment.                   

13

New Theories / Re: Can the theory of relativity be applied to photons?

« on: 21/04/2019 12:53:45 »

evan_au
Thank you for your much appreciated explanation. I must admit, after reading your description, I realised that my knowledge now is well out of date. I was qualified in 1974. I have to work hard to update my knowledge.

14

New Theories / Re: Can the theory of relativity be applied to photons?

« on: 21/04/2019 08:24:22 »

Based on what information?

Electrons orbit the atom at a certain speed to stay in their orbit just like the earth orbiting the sun to stay in its orbit.

When a photon is ejected by an atom, it moves at the speed of light.
 Unless influenced by space matter/forces, It will continue in motion in the original direction and at the same speed anywhere, at any time in space.

15

New Theories / Can the theory of relativity be applied to photons?

« on: 20/04/2019 12:00:49 »

Photons (light) speed, any where in space is always the same due to its atomic particle properties. If the speed is measured any time, any where in space at different locations by many observers moving at any speed from zero upwards in any direction, a constant speed is obtained (c).
Photons follow certain rules as other atomic particles do any where in space.
The speed of an electron orbiting the atom is the same every where in space measured by many observers at many locations and moving at any speed in any direction.
The theory of relativity cannot be applied in some cases and for certain things such as these.

16

New Theories / Re: How does light travel in space? Is it a particle or a wave?Hi Evan

« on: 16/04/2019 22:52:15 »

Hi Evan.
It is not the size of the holes in the space fabric I was talking about. In fact I assumed that the holes were minute and they were evenly distributed.
It was the frequencies of the photons trying to travel through space. The amplitudes of the waves is not a factor in the process of travel. The only factor is the wavelength.
If the wavelength is long, the photon can be assumed to be travelling in a straight line and can pass through any vertical hole depending on wave amplitude and so acting as a particle. Similarly if the wavelength is very short, the above behaviour applies.
When the wavelength dictates that the photon is either just above or below the hole in the vertical row, of course it will collide and get absorbed.
I hope that this is a better explanation

I feel that the idea is a possibility and can one day be proved right. Please let me have your comments.

17

New Theories / Re: How does light travel in space? Is it a particle or a wave?Idid not say

« on: 16/04/2019 12:01:06 »

I did not say the missing frequencies are in the visible or none visible range. This will have to be investigated and proved just like any theory/prediction/conclusion.

18

New Theories / Re: How does light travel in space? Is it a particle or a wave?

« on: 16/04/2019 10:00:15 »

This is what you would expect out of a filter. Its a prediction/conclusion.
If you let a light with many frequencies hit a plane with many minute holes, some photons with certain wavelengths will not be able to pass through holes they reach on the plane, they just miss them. In space they enter a cube and have to go through two planes in any direction.

19

New Theories / How does light travel in space? Is it a particle or a wave?

« on: 15/04/2019 18:59:38 »

Light is composed of photons with frequencies from very low to very high. Those photons with a very low frequency and those with a very high frequencies almost behave like particles.
(Very high wavelength and very low wavelength photons travelling in any direction resemble particles moving in straight line)
   
Space fabric is full of minute holes acting as a filter in all three planes. The fabric material absorbs some photons on collision preventing them from passing through and as a result the fabric gains photons energy, expands accordingly and it cannot be seen. Only certain photons with certain frequencies can pass through.

Therefore, light travels as a wave and a particle and photons of certain frequencies are missing / cannot be detected.

20

New Theories / Re: Atomic battery idea

« on: 28/03/2019 11:16:34 »

Atoms can only accept certain number of electrons (clouds)