1

**Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How Did Time Come Into Existence ?**

« **on:**27/07/2020 15:45:45 »

It is physics, not philosophy. You are stuck in GR. GR doesn't explain everything. I did not say there is a possible instantaneous process, I said there is a possible causal connection faster than light with no energy exchange. It is clearly a possibility in physics and it does not contradict GR. Show me a contradiction and I will show you how you are wrong.

How can you solve the singularity inside a black hole?

How can you explain entanglement?

How can you explain the speed of light is a constant?

What is the mechanism explaining the gravitational redshift? GR gives an explanation for a local observer but it doesn't say why a local observer is a local observer. The speed of light is a local constant but what is the speed of a photon in the absence of an observer or between two localities with different gravitational potentials?

How can you solve the singularity inside a black hole?

How can you explain entanglement?

How can you explain the speed of light is a constant?

What is the mechanism explaining the gravitational redshift? GR gives an explanation for a local observer but it doesn't say why a local observer is a local observer. The speed of light is a local constant but what is the speed of a photon in the absence of an observer or between two localities with different gravitational potentials?

The following users thanked this post: neilep