1

Just Chat! / Re: December 25 marks the 'Return of the Light'?

« on: 16/12/2016 18:14:04 »

alancalverd,

Please, no more OFF-TOPIC posts(74=P16+O15+S19+T20+S19). Do you have anymore comment on 'December 25 marks the 'Return of the Light'? Do you celebrate the Return of the Light? I do.

2

Just Chat! / Re: Did the Star of Bethlehem/Jesus' Birthdate occur on April 17, 6 BC?

« on: 16/12/2016 17:53:09 »

I have stated nothing in this forum that's "untrue". Be specific about what was "untrue".

You stated and implied the untruth that this thread was move by atheist scientists. That is religious stereotyping and untrue in the specific instance. It would be worth checking your facts before making false statements.

This thread was moved to 'This CAN'T be true' by a scientist who is not an atheist?

This thread will not be moved to the science sections as it is not a scientific question or discussion

Wrong. The discovery of what was observed in the heavens by the Magi on Saturday April 17, 6 BC is categorized as math, astronomy/astrology, history, religion and code-breaking. Pretty cool, huh?! 

however we are happy to move it to Just Chat.

Thanks.

It was not moved here as an insult, but because this section has a higher hit rate than many others and so would receive greater attention, particularly with the contentious title.

'This CAN'T be true' means just that. All of my posts(74=P16+O15+S19+T20+S19) are true.

3

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Are these the '4 Great Patterns in Nature' as perceived by the ancients?

« on: 16/12/2016 17:14:42 »

The greatest pattern in Nature is the day produced by the revolution of Earth. The 2nd greatest pattern in Nature is the 29.53 day cycle of the Moon with its phases being how this cycle is tracked. The 3rd greatest pattern in Nature is the solar year of 365.24 days and the 4th greatest pattern is the lunar year of 354.37 days. These 4 great patterns were first observed maybe 40,000+ years ago. They resulted in ancient man discovering and developing math/numerology and astronomy/astrology - the first science.

The '4 Great Patterns in Nature' were the basis of the great ancient civilzations of Sumeria, Egypt, India, China, Druids, Americas, Hebrews, Greeks, and Romans.

http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_year

4

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does this Universe have a Boundary/Event Horizon?

« on: 16/12/2016 16:51:37 »

If you presume that the universe is 'infinite', as I do

I do not. 'Infinite' referring to space and time and referring to this Universe would mean that there would be an endless continuum. Recognizing the Big Bang/Bit Bang 13.8 billion years ago as the beginning point means this Universe is not infinite. If you belief that there is no end to this Universe, then you believe that it is 'perpetual'.

then those supermassive black holes may have to do with how the universe is 'constructed'. We build it 'locally', that's what a infinite universe tells you, 'isotropically and homogeneously'. A 'Big Bang' is also a local definition from that point of view, the universe being the 'exact same' everywhere you stand looking out at it.

Again, since a Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole - is required for the creation of a universe, there is no such thing as an 'infinite universe'.

This Universe was created when a supermassive black hole in another universe exploded with energy and information. This Universe is one of quadrillions within 'The Conglomerate of Universes' (multiverse). The Conglomerate appears to be infinite and eternal.

5

New Theories / Re: Is Saturn's 4 'seasons' of 7 years (~7.4 years) each a result of an algorithm?

« on: 16/12/2016 16:32:02 »

RD,

You realize that all of science is based on finding mathematical patterns in Nature and global culture? I know that 'atheist' is the term for someone who dismisses/ignores all scientific and historical proofs of GOD/God-incarnate, but what do you call someone who dismisses/ignores obvious repetitive patterns?

Why not be open-minded like a good(7__4) scientist should be and check out the mathematical model/program/algorithm of GOD=7_4 Theory at http://GOD704.wikia.com ?

6

New Theories / Re: 4 lunar phases of 7 days (~7.4 days) each are produced by the GOD=7_4 algorithm?

« on: 16/12/2016 16:14:37 »

Strengthen yourself!

I will and same to you.

You mistakenly didn't address the topic of "4 lunar phases of 7 days (~7.4 days) each are produced by the GOD=7_4 algorithm". Please do. OFF-TOPIC posts(74=P16+O15+S19+T20+S19) are never good(7__4).

Please see the brief explanation of Plan-it Theory: GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 on Planet Nestor; FIG=6|7 (Design Worlds Theory) at http://GOD704.wikia.com .

7

New Theories / Re: 4 lunar phases of 7 days (~7.4 days) each are produced by the GOD=7_4 algorithm?

« on: 16/12/2016 16:08:45 »

What is the most likely throw of two dice? 7.

Really? I don't gamble, but maybe I've heard that before

How many Gospels are there? 4.

Yes, there are 4 standard Gospels(7 letters): Matthew(7), Mark(4), Luke(4) and John(4).

gospel=74=G7+O15+S19+P16+E5+L12
John=47=J10+O15+H8+N14

The King James Bible encodes "The Gospel(74) according(74) to St.(74) ---. Pretty amazing(7)/cool(4), huh?

And there is an infinite amount of bullshit.

Prove that claim.

Get a life, Alan. You need to get an open-mind and concern yourself with your karma. The law of karma is as real as the law of gravity.

8

New Theories / Is the Big Bang/Bit Bang a better description of the beginning of this Universe?

« on: 16/12/2016 15:18:13 »

"The Big Bang/Bit Bang - a supermassive white hole: explosion of energy & information - 13.8 billion years ago was the result of a supermassive black hole in another universe. Our Universe & that SBH share the same event horizon. That SBH & SWH formed an Einstein-Rosen bridge (wormhole). This duality combines these two singularities in a birth-life-death-transformation cycle in The Conglomerate of Universes (similar to multiverse). This 'simple' cause-and-effect explains both infinite space and eternity. Self-replication is the simplest plan for everything from a cell to a universe to a mind." - part of Seal #1 (of 7): The Conglomerate of Universes Theory (Universe Creation Theory) http://7seals.blogspot.com


"The very first information-processing revolution, from which all other revolution stem, began with the beginning of the universe itself. The big bang at the beginning of time consisted of huge numbers of elementary particles, colliding at temperatures of billions of degrees. Each of these particles carried with it bits of information, and every time two particles bounced off each other, those bits were transformed and processed. The big bang was a bit bang. Starting from its very earliest moments, every piece of the universe was processing information. The universe computes. It is this ongoing computation of the universe itself that gave rise naturally to subsequent information-processing revolutions such is life, sex, brains, language, and electronic computers." - Dr. Seth Lloyd, quantum computer scientist at MIT and author of 'Programming The Universe' (Vintage, 2006) http://www.uboeschenstein.ch/texte/Lloyd-texts.html


An Einstein-Rosen bridge commonly referred to as a wormhole was first proposed in 1935 by Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen. In 1971, Robert Hjellming presented a model in which a black hole would draw matter in while being connected to a white hole in a distant location, which expels this same matter.


During inflation, everything was moving faster-than-light. The inflationary epoch lasted from 10−36 seconds after the Big Bang/Bit Bang to sometime between 10−33 and 10−32 seconds after the singularity. Following the inflationary period, the Universe continued to expand, but the speed-of-light at 182,282 mi/s in a vacuum became constant.


At the Big Bang/Bit Bang, the 4 forces of nature (electromagnetism, gravity, strong & weak nuclear) were joined and separated during inflation.

9

Just Chat! / Re: Did the Star of Bethlehem/Jesus' Birthdate occur on April 17, 6 BC?

« on: 16/12/2016 15:02:30 »

Seriously? Jesus son of Joseph is the most important figure in history and if it is established that a BIG event in the heavens marked his birth, then that would be a proof of GOD/God-incarnate.

Texas sharpshooter fallacy.

I don't know what that is. I AM very anti-gun.

At that time, superstition was rife.

True and false. At that time, there was no difference between astrology and astronomy - it was science and it was real.

Anyone born on a date where something "big" happened would have had a head start when claiming to be the son of God, a prophet or whatever.

Correct. And we now know exactly what the BIG thing was that occured on Saturday April 17, 6 BC / 17.4.748 AUC / 29 Nisan 3755 HC that marked the birth of Y'shua bar Yosef.

Your view seems to be completely divorced from science.

Wrong again. Actually, it was professional astronomer Michael Molnar, professor at Rutgers University who made this scientific and historical discovery.

10

Just Chat! / Re: Did the Star of Bethlehem/Jesus' Birthdate occur on April 17, 6 BC?

« on: 16/12/2016 14:37:53 »

MOD COMMENT: A number of statements have been removed from this thread because they sterotype religious belief

That's false. I have stated nothing in this forum that's "untrue". Be specific about what was "untrue". Others have made false claims and have insulted me.

Placing this thread in the subforum 'That CAN'T be true' is a lie in itself. The 'Star of Bethlehem'/Jesus' Birthdate did occur on April 16, 6 BC. Why not do the right thing and move it out of this insulting subforum?

11

Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology / Re: Is the Jesus Family Tomb the BIGGEST Archaeological Discovery in History?

« on: 16/12/2016 03:12:08 »

Bored chemist,

My last post went right over your heard, so I'll try again. Here's that list fom that Wikipedia article. NONE of them were CRUCIFIED.

Thulis of Egypt, 1700 B. C.[5]
Chrishna of India, 1200 B.C.
Crite of Chaldea, 1200 B.C.[6][7]
Atys of Phrygia, 1170 B.C.
Thammuz or Tammuz of Syria, 1160 B.C.
Hesus or Eros 834 B.C.
Bali of Orissa, 725 B.C.[8]
Indra of Thibet (Tibet), 725 B.C.
Iao of Nepaul (Nepal), 622 B.C.[9][10]
Buddha Sakia (Muni) of India, 600 B.C.[11]
Mitra (Mithra) of Persia, 600 B.C.
Alcestos of Euripides, 600 B.C.
Quezalcoatl of Mexico, 587 B.C.
Wittoba of the Bilingonese, 552 B.C.[12]
Prometheus or Eschylus of Caucasus, 547 B.C.
Quirinus of Rome, 506 B.C.

Now, admit that you lost the $74 bet. Then I'll show you the scientific proof of reincarnation since you're unable to google it.

12

New Theories / Re: Is Venus .7 & Mercury .4 AU, Venus' orbit of 7.4 avg. Earth months an algorithm?

« on: 16/12/2016 02:49:39 »

(Post #47)

There are 7 days in a week, and 4 weeks in a lunar month.

There are 4 phases of the lunar cycle roughly 7 days (~7.4 days) each.
Lunar year + 7 day week + 4 days = solar year. The Roman Calendar designed by advisors to Julius Caesar has 7 thirty-one day months + 4 thirty day months + February's 28 (7x4)

Four has 4 letters, and seventh has 7 letters.

The 4th Commandment is "Keep the seventh(7) day holy". Sabbath(7)/Shabbat(7)/Shabbos(7).

My best friend's birthday is April 7th, and everyone knows April is the 4th month of the year.

Jesus(74=J10+E5+S19+U21+S19) the king(74) of the Judeans(74) - the Messiah(74) of the Jewish(74) people - was nailed on(74) the Cross(74=C3+R18+O15+S19+S19) on Friday April 7, 30 AD / 7.4.783 AUC / 14 Nisan 3790 HC.

An ounce is about 28 grams, and 28 is 4 times 7.

Genasis(74) 1:1 in its original Hebrew is 7 words and 28 letters: it's God's Signature.

Do you see where I'm going with this?

Yes. 4 is in the middle of 7. 7 is the 4th prime number, etc.

Please see GOD=7_4 Theory at http://GOD704.wikia.com .

13

New Theories / Re: Is Venus .7 & Mercury .4 AU, Venus' orbit of 7.4 avg. Earth months an algorithm?

« on: 16/12/2016 02:34:03 »

alancalverd,

Your drivel is the same old crap I always get from older atheists who never imagined that someone would come along with a very simple(74=S19+I9+M13+P16+L12+E5) and elegant* proof for a great deal of design in this Universe, our solar system, Earth and global culture. This repetitive pattern of GOD=7_4 has been known for thousands of years by the most elite (i.e. Freemasons) and has been encoded in some very important locations, i.e. GOD=7_4, 7/4=July 4th.

I have discerned it is your bizarre fixation with the atheistic dogma of randomness that doesn't allow you to see the 'theory of everything' - GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 - that explains unified strings 21/19 theory and much more, i.e. Venus .7 & Mercury .4 AU and Venus' orbit of 7.4 average Earth months.


*Synchronism: 20:28 "J Edgar Hoover FBI Building built in 1974." - 'The Blessing Way', 'The X-Files' (S3/Ep1, 1995)

14

Just Chat! / Re: December 25 marks the 'Return of the Light'?

« on: 16/12/2016 01:50:27 »

(Note to moderators: I AM copying a couple posts here from a thread that you've forced me to delete.)

Astronomer Michael Molnar wrote the book 'The Star of Bethlehem - The Legacy of the Magi' (Rutgers University Press, 1999) after discovering that Jesus* son of Joseph was born on April 17, 6 BC (17.4.748 AUC / 29 Nisan 3755 HC). The following is from his website...

"Superposed on the photograph of the coin is what I found: Jupiter underwent two occultations ('eclipses') by the Moon in Aries in 6 BC. Jupiter was the regal 'star' that conferred kingships - a power that was amplified when Jupiter was in close conjunctions with the Moon. The second occultation on April 17 coincided precisely when Jupiter was "in the east," a condition mentioned twice in the biblical account about the Star of Bethlehem. In August of that year Jupiter became stationary and then 'went before' through Aries where it became stationary again on December 19, 6 BC. This is when the regal planet 'stood over.' - a secondary royal portent also described in the Bible. In particular, there is confirmation from a Roman astrologer that the conditions of April 17, 6 BC were believed to herald the birth of a divine, immortal, and omnipotent person born under the sign of the Jews, which we now know was Aries the Ram (Lamb). Furthermore, the coins of Antioch and ancient astrological documents show that there was indeed a Star of Bethlehem as reported in the biblical account of Matthew.


Revealing the Star of Bethlehem - The Legacy of the Magi

Most people have heard of the story of how the Star of Bethlehem led the Magi to the infant Jesus. There have been many theories about what appeared in the sky that caused the Magi to embark on their journey to find the new King of the Jews. As an astronomer, I too have wondered what the Magi saw, but never thought that I could find it until I stumbled upon an important clue.

My investigations show that there indeed was a Star of Bethlehem exactly as reported in the Bible. My book describes the evidence I gleaned from ancient coins and astrological records - important information that was unnoticed by earlier investigators. Here are some of the important findings in my book:
​
A serendipitous discovery, originating from Roman coins of Antioch, revealed that Aries the Ram was the sign of the Jews and that the Magi's star appeared in that sign of the zodiac. (pp. 3-4)
The Magi were highly respected "wise men" who practiced Greek astrology, the precursor of modern astrology. (p. 42)
Ancient stargazers described in detail the celestial conditions for the births of kings and emperors. Their writings describe the Magi's star. (p. 64)
The star was not a comet, nor was it a supernova. (pp. 17-25)
The people of Jerusalem did not see the star because they did not understand Greek astrology - but Herod did and took action. (p. 11)
As stated in the Bible, the Magi's star did indeed appear "in the east" in Aries. The book describes the unusual celestial conditions of that day, which signified the birth of the Messiah. (p. 89)
The Magi rejoiced that the star later "went before and stood over" - a secondary sign confirming the birth of the King of the Jews. (pp. 87-96)
December 25th was not the birth day of Jesus, nor does the Christian Era (A.D. 1) determine the year Jesus was born. (pp. 55-57)
A Christian Roman astrologer wrote that the celestial conditions I describe marked the birth of a "divine and immortal" person - a likely reference to the birth of Jesus. (pp. 104-108)
The ancient documents show that the horoscope for this day was more significant than the important horoscopes of the Emperors Augustus Caesar and Hadrian. (pp. 98-102)
The Magi's star appeared two years before the death of Herod, which explains why two year old children were condemned as threats to his throne. (pp. 117-118)
The account of Luke refers to the "census" of Quirinius under Augustus Caesar - a connection to the Roman coins of Antioch. (pp. 121-123)
Emperor Nero was marked as the biblical Antichrist - a prophecy related to the presence of Aries the Ram in his horoscope. (pp. 109-116)
​
I hope that you will find this new information as fascinating as I did."


(*Synchronism: 12/6/16 11:26 "A new prophecy" 11:35 "This one is different, he carries starlight in his wake." - 'The Fires of Pompeii', 'Doctor Who' (S4/Ep2, 2008) on BBC AMERICA)

15

Just Chat! / Re: December 25 marks the 'Return of the Light'?

« on: 16/12/2016 01:33:11 »

Discussion of how December 25 scientifically and historically became Christmas and associated with the birth of Jesus son of Joseph the Nazarean is very important!

On a history site maybe, but not here which is about specific science.

The winter solstice is the basis for the celebration of Christmas. This combines science, history and religion and is obviously very important!

Astronomical observances, i.e. the '7 Classical Planets' are ultimately at the origin of seemingly all religion. The knowledge and discussion of this is very important! Don't you agree?

Again on a history site yes, or a philosophy or psychology site.

Study of the 7 Classical Planets is what began math/numerology and astronomy/astrology - science. Anyone who ignores this is either ignorant or has an agenda where their dogma is threatened.

You are not making a good case so until you do this is being moved.

That's false. What's your true agenda? Are you an atheist? Do you feel that your dogma is being threatened, so you figure if you can show disrespect for the evidence that that will make it less legitimate?

PS gematria is not a science subject either.

Another false statement. Linguistics is obviously a science and gematria is part of it. Code-breaking is also a science. Gematria has been around for ~3,000 years if not longer, although it's been kept secret. It's a powerful code!

Why not confess that you didn't even know what gematria was until I explained it to you yesterday? I was the first to write about English gematria - Simple(6,74) English(7,74) Gematria(8,74) - on the Internet and I AM thee leading expert on it.

GOD=7_4
simple**=74=S19+I9+M13+P16+L12+E5
English=74=E5+N14+G7+L12+I9+S19+H8
gematria=74=G7+E5+M13+A1+T20+R18+I9+A1


*Synchronism: 20:13 "Do you know the 10 Commandments, Scully? The 4th one is the observance of the 7th day as the Sabbath"... "It was the only code the Japanese couldn't break." **20:27 "JUst let me know who I can talk to to break that code?!" "It's so clear now; so simple." "You're a smart boy, Fox. Smarter than me." - 'Anasazi', 'The X-Files' (S2/Ep25, 1995) on WBFS/my33

16

Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology / Re: Is the Jesus Family Tomb the BIGGEST Archaeological Discovery in History?

« on: 15/12/2016 17:32:10 »

"Do you have a list of those "17 crucified saviour-gods born of virgins"? I bet $74 you can't prodcue that."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World's_Sixteen_Crucified_Saviors
Please send the $74 to a charity on my behalf. Thanks

Thanks for that link; I hadn't seen it before. Here's a list fom that Wikipedia article. I don't believe any of them were CRUCIFIED...

Thulis of Egypt, 1700 B. C.[5]
Chrishna of India, 1200 B.C.
Crite of Chaldea, 1200 B.C.[6][7]
Atys of Phrygia, 1170 B.C.
Thammuz or Tammuz of Syria, 1160 B.C.
Hesus or Eros 834 B.C.
Bali of Orissa, 725 B.C.[8]
Indra of Thibet (Tibet), 725 B.C.
Iao of Nepaul (Nepal), 622 B.C.[9][10]
Buddha Sakia (Muni) of India, 600 B.C.[11]
Mitra (Mithra) of Persia, 600 B.C.
Alcestos of Euripides, 600 B.C.
Quezalcoatl of Mexico, 587 B.C.
Wittoba of the Bilingonese, 552 B.C.[12]
Prometheus or Ęschylus of Caucasus, 547 B.C.
Quirinus of Rome, 506 B.C.

Well? I believe you lost the $74 bet, right?

17

Just Chat! / Re: December 25 marks the 'Return of the Light'?

« on: 15/12/2016 17:17:02 »

Colin2B,

Recognition of the winter solstice is obviously part of both physics and astronomy. It's one of the first scientific discoveries made by the ancients along with the summer solstice and the spring and fall equinoxes. Discussion of how December 25 scientifically and historically became Christmas and associated with the birth of Jesus son of Joseph the Nazarean is very important!

Astronomical observances, i.e. the '7 Classical Planets' are ultimately at the origin of seemingly all religion. The knowledge and discussion of this is very important! Don't you agree?
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_planets

18

New Theories / Is Saturn's 4 'seasons' of 7 years (~7.4 years) each a result of an algorithm?

« on: 15/12/2016 16:51:00 »

Saturn's orbit of 29.46 years is 4 'seasons' of roughly 7 years (~7.4 years) each. Notice the similiarity with the Moon's orbit of 29.53 days and its 4 phases being roughly 7 days (~7.4 days) each. These are examples of an algorithm: GOD=7_4. See it explained briefly at http://GOD704.wikia.com .

This is NOT a discussion of religion(74=R18+E5+L12+I9+G7+I9+O+N14) or numerology. It's the recognition of the BIGGEST pattern/mathematical model/program/algorithm/'fractal'/code in Nature and global culture. I ask atheists to put aside their dogma and prejudices, and let's have a respectful scientific discussion of the evidence.

19

Just Chat! / Re: December 25 marks the 'Return of the Light'?

« on: 15/12/2016 04:07:08 »

Seems it has to do with how we defined a new day. And that one goes a long way back. We defined the new day to start at sunset, not midnight as we do now.

Like the Hebrews/Jews. Do you celebrate Christmas - the 'Return of the Light' - now on the 24th or 25th?

And no, Syphrum is in no need of a psychiatric evaluation he just have a different opinion from yours.

He was the one who rudely told that to me first.

Did you know about the connection of 3 days after the winter solstice and Christmas/the birth of the Christ?

20

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does this Universe have a Boundary/Event Horizon?

« on: 15/12/2016 03:57:35 »

Dr Christopher Baird says

Who's he?

"In the real Universe, no black holes contain singularities... When scientists talk about black hole singularities they are talking about the errors that appear in our current theories and not about objects that actually exist."

That's false. Baird certainly is entitled to his opinion, but he is in no place to judge other scientists when they, "Talk about black hole singularities".

This suggests that not all scientists seriously consider time and space to be infinitely compressed. I thought it wise to find out if you actually thought that space was infinitely curved in a physical sense,  or if you were talking about an approximation.

Space and time are not infinite in this Universe. The Big Bang/Bit Bang 13.8 billion years ago is proof of a beginning of spacetime, therefore there's no infinity in our past in THIS Universe. There is a HUGE number of universes within The Conglomerate (multiverse), but that's also a HUGE finite number at any given time.