1

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Do the electrons that generate an electric current come from the wire's atoms?

« on: 15/01/2020 23:08:42 »

The electric current is better understood as an area of flux-current or magnoflux which is magnetically spinning inside the conductors molecules. Electro-magnetic ray energy is composed of a magnetic vibration of flux which induces a current [amps] at right angles. also known as a magnon. If a voltage is applied in the 3rd dimension the inertia will cycle forward as electric light #energy #vibration #magnetic 

2

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Do the electrons that generate an electric current come from the wire's atoms?

« on: 11/01/2020 23:22:13 »

It is not true that an electric current  is a flow of electrons through a conductor as electrons are particles and would take infinite energy to get to the speed of light.  However, magnons which can vibrate the magnetic flux inside a conductor electron shell enclosure and are capable of travelling at the speed of light, as an area of vibrating flux/current. 
This action can be witnessed in action in an isolation transformer in which the power passes from the primary winding to the secondary winding by linking the amp-turns flux areas together, by transmitting the energy through the iron core at the speed of light.

3

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How is electric current maintained with batteries?

« on: 04/01/2020 00:23:30 »

Yes, the ionic energy is held in the electrolyte solution or paste. People used to check the specific gravity of the solution to indicate the amount of charge that was in the lead-acid car battery in amp-hours. How can we add weight without adding particles of matter??     Physicists will say it is impossible but yet if the density has increased then how!.
The real question is will a fully charged car battery weigh more than a discharged battery and if so by how much?? and where did the matter come from?

4

New Theories / Re: On Electric Current and Radiant Energy

« on: 01/01/2020 21:49:35 »

 Magnoflux alternative electric universe agrees with much of what RTC the OP says but they need to expand the article with some drawings of what is going on in the solar wind. Your explanation of magnetic rings is good though.
From the electrostatic point of view if the protons +ve ions are moving outwards from sun towards a planet then the -ve electrons should be moving in the opposite direction.  Have a look at my article on wordpress  https://magnoflux3d.wordpress.com/ and let me know how to improve it.  Happy New Year   

5

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Can electrically charged objects charge batteries?

« on: 01/01/2020 21:04:33 »

Electric vehicles are environmentally friendly for clean air in cities.
 BUT where there is plenty of vegetation to absorb the carbon dioxide and produce oxygen it is better to use hydrocarbon fuels, rather than electric which could overload the electric grid. It is impossibly expensive to store grid power in batteries.
NOTE  To provide extra power to the grid would be uneconomical and wasteful if the power is produced by burning the same fuel the vehicles use anyway.

6

New Theories / Re: New theories on structure or density of dark matter?

« on: 29/03/2019 03:53:14 »

If you google" magnoflux alternative electric 3D universe", the magnoflux spin effect is hypothesized and the magnetic dark matter force that is 6.3 times stronger than gravity identified.  The stars are assumed to be electrically positively charged and thus molecules are enclosed in positron shells and appear as antimatter which results in the stars electrostatic attracting their balancing negative electron shelled planets/moons/asteroids with a dark energy electric force that is 25 times stronger than gravity. 

7

New Theories / Re: New theories on structure or density of dark matter?

« on: 25/03/2019 22:54:29 »

There is no such thing as dark matter.  It has never been observed so therefore is does not exist. However, there is a dark force that causes a 2 pi magnoflux spin effect which in magnetised space is 6.3 times stronger than gravity.

8

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Are all the planets in the solar system the same age?

« on: 20/02/2019 03:29:09 »

Evan,  I would love to know whether the ALMA observatory can assess the spectrum from the centre star matter and compare it with the outer gas/dust ring.  I would predict the inner star would have an absorption spectrum and outer gas/dust an emission spectrum

9

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What made the Earth tip on its axis?

« on: 04/02/2019 23:22:35 »

Could be to do with the position of the moons rotations which are locked magnetically to their host planets by our star. The sun sees the planet/moon combination as a single unit, a single target for its solar wind particles and electromagnetic energy.

10

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How long could a 400kg space probe last in an antimatter plasma?

« on: 23/12/2018 20:35:08 »

Thanks Janus, I found an article on space.com that showed a video clip taken from parker probe which shows the suns emission pattern with mercury passing by in the background.  The emissions pattern shows that the sun is like a huge lighthouse beaming particles and light outwards but not at all equal in all directions.  Could it be that the major beams are directed towards the heaviest planets which are linked to the sun magnetically in  sort of magnoflux tunnels do you think?

11

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How long could a 400kg space probe last in an antimatter plasma?

« on: 08/12/2018 19:29:25 »

Thanks Evan, Is there any sign of a signal yet as I think 4 December was mentioned as date of expected reconnection??

12

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How long could a 400kg space probe last in an antimatter plasma?

« on: 09/11/2018 16:30:32 »

Well, thank goodness NASA have managed to get a signal from Parker which means it is still with us.  The feedback from its close encounter with the sun will I am sure be truly useful in connection with any variations in the solar wind H+ions and electron velocities and the effect the suns magnetic field is having inside the corona.

13

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How long could a 400kg space probe last in an antimatter plasma?

« on: 07/11/2018 09:17:07 »

NASA have already lost touch with Parker signals but I take it they can track its position with telescopes and will see if it is suddenly annihilated?  December seems to be forever to wait.

14

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How long could a 400kg space probe last in an antimatter plasma?

« on: 06/11/2018 14:44:42 »

If the stars and our sun is made of anti-matter then its corona will contain anti-matter plasma.  So how long will it be before the probe is totally annihilated? 

15

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is it called dark matter instead of dark gravity?

« on: 05/11/2018 12:09:25 »

Science cannot balance the galaxies or solar system using mass attraction force alone.  So there must be other forces in space possibly a dark electrostatic force that is pushing the stars apart and a dark magnetic force attracting planets to stars would  balance the universe?

16

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is it called dark matter instead of dark gravity?

« on: 04/11/2018 16:46:24 »

What about photon wave energy.  According to wikipedia photons have no mass and no electric charge.  Photons are simply a tiny volume of rotating magnetic energy.  So possibly gravity is a magnetic attracting force?

17

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 22/10/2018 16:47:27 »

I am not aware of any of Newtons laws of gravity that indicate a moon would be held in synchronised with its planet. However, it is very common with electromagnetic rotors. 

18

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 21/10/2018 15:05:27 »

Just looked up Jupiters moons and it has found that the moons like our moon always have the same surface inwards according to NASA who quote below. 
Three of the moons influence each other in an interesting way. Io is in a tug-of-war with Ganymede and Europa, and Europa's orbital period (time to go around Jupiter once) is twice Io's period, and Ganymede's period is twice that of Europa. In other words, every time Ganymede goes around Jupiter once, Europa makes two orbits and Io makes four orbits. The moons all keep the same face towards Jupiter as they orbit, meaning that each moon turns once on its axis for every orbit around Jupiter.
Now this always facing towards the planet means that their magnetic cores are locked together and synchronised which means that if the moons start to slow down the planets magnetic field will speed them up again and they will ellipse rather than rotate.   

19

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 18/10/2018 09:53:55 »

Thank you Jason.  I have just been reading about the ESA venus express and their discovery that the planet has magnetic reconnection beyond the planets orbit.  Now this is not surprising as we know by the Norfolk island effect that radio coms are disrupted by sun spots and conclude therefore that the sun is magnetically linked to its planets and using the magnoflux spin effect is able to hold them in stable orbits.    So why can't the planets do the same with their moons? 

20

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 17/10/2018 15:28:47 »

But if the closer proximity robs momentum of the moon then it will slow and re-enter the upper atmosphere and hit the planet.  To stop that happening we need a feedback mechanism which is probably a magnetic repulsion.   I have been puzzled for sometime as to why mercury and venus have such minimal magnetic fields but the reason could be that they have no moons to be pushed away.