1

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How does a fuel cell work and what is its efficiency?

« on: 16/07/2018 16:55:34 »

"t is also important to take losses due to fuel production, transportation, and storage into account. Fuel cell vehicles running on compressed hydrogen may have a power-plant-to-wheel efficiency of 22% if the hydrogen is stored as high-pressure gas, and 17% if it is stored as liquid hydrogen.[67] Fuel cells cannot store energy like a battery,[68] except as hydrogen, but in some applications, such as stand-alone power plants based on discontinuous sources such as solar or wind power, they are combined with electrolyzers and storage systems to form an energy storage system. Most hydrogen is used for oil refining, chemicals and fertilizer production and therefore produced by steam methane reforming, which emits carbon dioxide.[69] The overall efficiency (electricity to hydrogen and back to electricity) of such plants (known as round-trip efficiency), using pure hydrogen and pure oxygen can be "from 35 up to 50 percent", depending on gas density and other conditions.[70]. The electrolyzer/fuel cell system can store indefinite quantities of hydrogen, and is therefore suited for long-term storage."           This statement to me rules hydrogen fuel cells out as totally inefficient.   
The best way to store hydrogen is to combine it with carbon as a hydrocarbon liquid.  Easy to store at room temperature and economical on use of precious materials.

2

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there a difference between zero energy and a zero balance of energy?

« on: 25/06/2018 06:59:51 »

If the fundamental energy in the universe were electrical then it could balance if the negatively charged matter balanced the positively charged stuff?

3

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does this explain the Universe's missing matter?

« on: 23/06/2018 14:14:21 »

What caught my eye is this "Nicastro et al.6 report the detection of the X-ray absorption signatures of baryons in the spectra of a bright background object. "
Now the important finding here is that it is an absorption spectrum and not an emission spectrum.  They have not found missing matter but probably the signature of anti-matter

4

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does time dilation affect temperature?

« on: 11/06/2018 15:57:19 »

Temperature surely increases as a set volume of some matter stuff moves faster.  But that stuff does not have to be matter it can be an electromagnetic 3D vibration which over a set period of time is sensed as fundamental energy. Sure how your observers would see a difference.

5

New Theories / Magnetic solar system hypothesis

« on: 04/02/2018 22:09:56 »

If the solar system were magnetised in the flat x,y direction then that could account for the spinning of the planets around their star provided there is a direct voltage link between the planet and its star in the z direction which would result in a 3D electromagnetic solar system and probably a 3D electromagnetized universe.

6

New Theories / OUR SUN ONLY WEIGHS 3% OF CURRENT VALUE, JUST 6x10^28 kG

« on: 18/12/2016 12:41:21 »

 

My back of a fag packet calcs when assessed in two ways indicate the same answer. Please take a few minutes to view attached cartoon of a stars eye view of the solar system which reflects the electrification and recent garden shed experiment of the magnetic spin effect applied to the solar system.  Go to youtube kDpYbo-x8Kg to see magnoflux video



 

7

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is global warming the fault overpopulation rather than motor vehicles?

« on: 06/12/2016 11:44:19 »

Let me explain my thinking.
Human and animals breath in oxygenated air and exhaust CO^2
Trees and flora breath in carbon dioxide CO^2 and exhaust oxygen

To balance more human/animals then more trees/grass are needed

But look at what is happening, we are clearing forests and building over the land at the same time as expanding not only the human population but also the animal to feed us with proteins.  We are out of balance and car and power station emissions are just a marginal add on problem.

8

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is star light emitted as an absorption spectrum?

« on: 30/11/2016 16:29:08 »

Thank you Evan; I will keep an eye out to see if anything extra turns up.

9

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is star light emitted as an absorption spectrum?

« on: 29/11/2016 17:37:55 »

Our nearest star, the Alpha Centauri binary are now said to be joined by red giant Proxima which the other two rotate. If the light from Proxima contains no absorption lines then it would be a massive planet but not a star wouldn't it?

10

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is star light emitted as an absorption spectrum?

« on: 21/11/2016 16:28:52 »

It is well known that sunlight is re-emitted from our star as an absorption spectrum.  I think that would imply that star light is also emitted as an absorption spectrum or are there special conditions?

11

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does a microwave use the same amount of energy for all food?

« on: 12/11/2016 12:18:46 »

Googled and found this "Considering the frequency of 2,450 MHz, the wavelength of microwave oven radiation is about 12 cm and the quantum energy of a microwave photon is about 1 x 10-5 eV. The radiation interaction at such energies is limited to the production of molecular rotation and torsion."
I think we all agree that the magnetron cavity is vibrated magnetically at 2.45GHz which vibrates the magnetic moment inside the water molecule thus increasing its temperature

12

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What is the force exerted by the sun on the earth

« on: 07/11/2016 17:35:00 »

Yes, I agree as photons have an energy of hf which is time dependant. Feynmans diagrams of QED are correct if you understand them in 3 dimensions. Electromagnetic light energy is 3D magnetic pulse volume of vibrating energy = root of current area{ Ix[current] times Iy[ right angle flux]} X Vz[voltage at right angles] X Cos .thi and can be massless in a magnetised space.

13

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What is dark energy?

« on: 28/10/2016 16:49:18 »

Dark energy could be the name for electrostatic repulsion force between stars which is about 20 times stronger than gravity.  A further magnetic force of 3 times gravity also adds as a dark matter force.  This balances the galaxies as their magnetic spins appears as extra dark matter astronomers are looking for. 
WMAP did confirm we only have a third of matter required and that expansion of universe is impossible unless a negative gravity force of 23 times gravity is present.  The maths is correct if you electrify the universe. Just semantic names?

14

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What is the force exerted by the sun on the earth

« on: 24/10/2016 09:48:24 »

The frame of reference used to be the centre of the earth, then the centre of the sun but now it is the centre of our galaxy in Sagittarius A* the magnetic black hole hub of our galaxy.  How does relativity explain the moving of the stars around that hub without electromagnetism??

15

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What is the force exerted by the sun on the earth

« on: 19/10/2016 17:11:21 »

The WMAP results seem to suggest that we a missing a really large dark force.  So if its not magnetic perhaps its electrostatic but our instruments cant sense it?

16

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What is the force exerted by the sun on the earth

« on: 17/10/2016 13:00:15 »

 (this seems to imply that gravity if just momentum acting along a line of force - is this a reasonable conclusion).  What about the electromagnetic forces that spin the planets??

17

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does dark energy force the Universe to expand?

« on: 10/10/2016 15:35:07 »

But it is nearly true. If the force of attraction by electro-magnetism is 24 times stronger than that of gravity then the sun is lighter than estimated.
If the weight of the sun were only 4.5% of its estimated value of 1.9x10^30 then its mass weight would be just 8.9x10^28 kG.    If you add up the total weight of the planets is 2.67x10^28 to which must be added all the moons. asteroids, ice and all the other material in the outer belts plus the gases and we getting surprising near to a balance of the solar systems real matter and the suns positively enclosed anti-matter.

18

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does dark energy force the Universe to expand?

« on: 02/10/2016 11:00:27 »

The amount of positive charge in any system must be balanced by negative charge.  Planets and moons, asteroids etc are all enclosed in electrons and must appear as negative charges from outer space.
To balance all that negative charged matter would require the sun and stars to be positive anti-matter which presumably is why the suns spectrum is absorption instead of emission.

19

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Does dark energy force the Universe to expand?

« on: 26/09/2016 16:57:57 »

Could this dark energy be the 3D electromagnetic force of repulsion and how can it be measured?

20

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why Does Venus Spin The Other Way Round ?...and other rotational questions !

« on: 20/09/2016 16:54:06 »

It spins because there is a magnetic link between planet and the sun/star.  Faradays law of rotation if flux/amps field is at right angles to the voltage.