1

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How long could a 400kg space probe last in an antimatter plasma?

« on: 09/11/2018 16:30:32 »

Well, thank goodness NASA have managed to get a signal from Parker which means it is still with us.  The feedback from its close encounter with the sun will I am sure be truly useful in connection with any variations in the solar wind H+ions and electron velocities and the effect the suns magnetic field is having inside the corona.

2

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How long could a 400kg space probe last in an antimatter plasma?

« on: 07/11/2018 09:17:07 »

NASA have already lost touch with Parker signals but I take it they can track its position with telescopes and will see if it is suddenly annihilated?  December seems to be forever to wait.

3

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How long could a 400kg space probe last in an antimatter plasma?

« on: 06/11/2018 14:44:42 »

If the stars and our sun is made of anti-matter then its corona will contain anti-matter plasma.  So how long will it be before the probe is totally annihilated? 

4

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is it called dark matter instead of dark gravity?

« on: 05/11/2018 12:09:25 »

Science cannot balance the galaxies or solar system using mass attraction force alone.  So there must be other forces in space possibly a dark electrostatic force that is pushing the stars apart and a dark magnetic force attracting planets to stars would  balance the universe?

5

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is it called dark matter instead of dark gravity?

« on: 04/11/2018 16:46:24 »

What about photon wave energy.  According to wikipedia photons have no mass and no electric charge.  Photons are simply a tiny volume of rotating magnetic energy.  So possibly gravity is a magnetic attracting force?

6

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 22/10/2018 16:47:27 »

I am not aware of any of Newtons laws of gravity that indicate a moon would be held in synchronised with its planet. However, it is very common with electromagnetic rotors. 

7

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 21/10/2018 15:05:27 »

Just looked up Jupiters moons and it has found that the moons like our moon always have the same surface inwards according to NASA who quote below. 
Three of the moons influence each other in an interesting way. Io is in a tug-of-war with Ganymede and Europa, and Europa's orbital period (time to go around Jupiter once) is twice Io's period, and Ganymede's period is twice that of Europa. In other words, every time Ganymede goes around Jupiter once, Europa makes two orbits and Io makes four orbits. The moons all keep the same face towards Jupiter as they orbit, meaning that each moon turns once on its axis for every orbit around Jupiter.
Now this always facing towards the planet means that their magnetic cores are locked together and synchronised which means that if the moons start to slow down the planets magnetic field will speed them up again and they will ellipse rather than rotate.   

8

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 18/10/2018 09:53:55 »

Thank you Jason.  I have just been reading about the ESA venus express and their discovery that the planet has magnetic reconnection beyond the planets orbit.  Now this is not surprising as we know by the Norfolk island effect that radio coms are disrupted by sun spots and conclude therefore that the sun is magnetically linked to its planets and using the magnoflux spin effect is able to hold them in stable orbits.    So why can't the planets do the same with their moons? 

9

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 17/10/2018 15:28:47 »

But if the closer proximity robs momentum of the moon then it will slow and re-enter the upper atmosphere and hit the planet.  To stop that happening we need a feedback mechanism which is probably a magnetic repulsion.   I have been puzzled for sometime as to why mercury and venus have such minimal magnetic fields but the reason could be that they have no moons to be pushed away.

10

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is acceleration downwards due to gravity less when the Moon is overhead?

« on: 15/10/2018 12:04:05 »

If you look up lunar Perigee and Apogee then you will see that the distance from moon to planet varies considerable monthly like next Perigee is 17 October 404,000km and Apogee is 31 October is 370,000km.  What is the feedback mechanism that controls this elliptic orbit?  Does it follow the suns 22 year cycle??

11

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How does a fuel cell work and what is its efficiency?

« on: 16/07/2018 16:55:34 »

"t is also important to take losses due to fuel production, transportation, and storage into account. Fuel cell vehicles running on compressed hydrogen may have a power-plant-to-wheel efficiency of 22% if the hydrogen is stored as high-pressure gas, and 17% if it is stored as liquid hydrogen.[67] Fuel cells cannot store energy like a battery,[68] except as hydrogen, but in some applications, such as stand-alone power plants based on discontinuous sources such as solar or wind power, they are combined with electrolyzers and storage systems to form an energy storage system. Most hydrogen is used for oil refining, chemicals and fertilizer production and therefore produced by steam methane reforming, which emits carbon dioxide.[69] The overall efficiency (electricity to hydrogen and back to electricity) of such plants (known as round-trip efficiency), using pure hydrogen and pure oxygen can be "from 35 up to 50 percent", depending on gas density and other conditions.[70]. The electrolyzer/fuel cell system can store indefinite quantities of hydrogen, and is therefore suited for long-term storage."           This statement to me rules hydrogen fuel cells out as totally inefficient.   
The best way to store hydrogen is to combine it with carbon as a hydrocarbon liquid.  Easy to store at room temperature and economical on use of precious materials.

12

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there a difference between zero energy and a zero balance of energy?

« on: 25/06/2018 06:59:51 »

If the fundamental energy in the universe were electrical then it could balance if the negatively charged matter balanced the positively charged stuff?

13

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does this explain the Universe's missing matter?

« on: 23/06/2018 14:14:21 »

What caught my eye is this "Nicastro et al.6 report the detection of the X-ray absorption signatures of baryons in the spectra of a bright background object. "
Now the important finding here is that it is an absorption spectrum and not an emission spectrum.  They have not found missing matter but probably the signature of anti-matter

14

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does time dilation affect temperature?

« on: 11/06/2018 15:57:19 »

Temperature surely increases as a set volume of some matter stuff moves faster.  But that stuff does not have to be matter it can be an electromagnetic 3D vibration which over a set period of time is sensed as fundamental energy. Sure how your observers would see a difference.

15

New Theories / Magnetic solar system hypothesis

« on: 04/02/2018 22:09:56 »

If the solar system were magnetised in the flat x,y direction then that could account for the spinning of the planets around their star provided there is a direct voltage link between the planet and its star in the z direction which would result in a 3D electromagnetic solar system and probably a 3D electromagnetized universe.

16

New Theories / OUR SUN ONLY WEIGHS 3% OF CURRENT VALUE, JUST 6x10^28 kG

« on: 18/12/2016 12:41:21 »

 

My back of a fag packet calcs when assessed in two ways indicate the same answer. Please take a few minutes to view attached cartoon of a stars eye view of the solar system which reflects the electrification and recent garden shed experiment of the magnetic spin effect applied to the solar system.  Go to youtube kDpYbo-x8Kg to see magnoflux video



 

17

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is global warming the fault overpopulation rather than motor vehicles?

« on: 06/12/2016 11:44:19 »

Let me explain my thinking.
Human and animals breath in oxygenated air and exhaust CO^2
Trees and flora breath in carbon dioxide CO^2 and exhaust oxygen

To balance more human/animals then more trees/grass are needed

But look at what is happening, we are clearing forests and building over the land at the same time as expanding not only the human population but also the animal to feed us with proteins.  We are out of balance and car and power station emissions are just a marginal add on problem.

18

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is star light emitted as an absorption spectrum?

« on: 30/11/2016 16:29:08 »

Thank you Evan; I will keep an eye out to see if anything extra turns up.

19

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is star light emitted as an absorption spectrum?

« on: 29/11/2016 17:37:55 »

Our nearest star, the Alpha Centauri binary are now said to be joined by red giant Proxima which the other two rotate. If the light from Proxima contains no absorption lines then it would be a massive planet but not a star wouldn't it?

20

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is star light emitted as an absorption spectrum?

« on: 21/11/2016 16:28:52 »

It is well known that sunlight is re-emitted from our star as an absorption spectrum.  I think that would imply that star light is also emitted as an absorption spectrum or are there special conditions?