« on: Today at 05:37:34 »
Good, then GR gives a 1/R for a spiral galaxy
If it did, then it would have been falsified long ago as it would not even match the behavior of gravity in our Solar System.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Good, then GR gives a 1/R for a spiral galaxy
I think that even good theories etc can have a circular argument, as long as u know, but not knowing can i think lead to a bloody war. The main circular argument in SR & GR is that much of GR is modeled around ensuring that the constancy of the speed of light is retained, eg near mass, eg invoking time dilation & length contraction near mass to yield the slowing of light near mass.
It would be handy to have easy access to such a list of precessions for all the planets. But so difficult to find.
I wonder why. Must be a good reason. Thinking thinking thinking.
COMPARE THE SIMPLE MATH COMPUTATION, USING SEMILATUS RECTUM COMPUTATION B TO RELATIVISTIC COMPUTATION PER ANNEX B. SEE THE FIGURES FOR ALL PLANETS. THEY ARE THE SAME AND EXACT.!!IT PROVES THAT THE COMPUTATION OF DR. EINSTEIN IS THAT WAY, WORK BACK.
Reiterating, this is the only way Dr. Einstein saw the problem., by working back and he did it.
Einstein's GR includes Newton. Einstein's GR is an extension of Newton (a modification if u like). Kill Newton & Einstein dies.
That makes absolutely no sense when you consider that Newton's equations and Einstein's equations give different answers to queries about things like kinetic energy and gravitational lensing. Newton being wrong then obviously does not make Einstein wrong.
Or praps u dont care if Newton dies. Praps u are confident that Einsteinian relativity can simply detach from Newton's corpse & simply suck onto any passing basic body of theory while that body is alive, until that theory is itself killed off or something, at which time ER can just do it all again, getting bigger all the time, nothing to see here, hey everyone look over there its a blackhole.
Here is some good wordage re this.
I wonder whether there is a circular argument in there somewhere.
But in any case all it takes is one disagreement to sink the equation
i believe that Mars or Venus does just that.
That is the only way the anomalous precession of Mercury can be resolved, by working back.
Einstein's equations include Newton. Attack Newton & u attack Einstein.
But as i said, dark thisorthat defends ER.
My point was that the science-mafia (Einsteinologists) were happy to accept papers etc positing dark this & dark that because thems papers helped prop up Einsteinology.
THE ONLY WAY THAT ANOMALOUS PRECESSION IS ARRIVED/RESOLVED..BY WORKING BACK..
No i dont think that there is any fudging of measurements -- but any redshift computations & crunching of thems measurements to make their data will be nonsense hencely some of their data will be nonsense -- & their dark theories are wrong.
It was respected Forum King Kriptid who said:
Nevertheless both have inherent positive and negative property, the same inherent positive and negative property of spacetime.
Astronomical telescopes from two separate places, 2,000 miles away, provide the data, feed it to laser interferometers underground tunnels
arms,some 2,000 miles long, completely emptied of air, thus vacuumed
The point is all the way after astronomical telescope pick up the collision of galaxiy
Because light waves and gravitational waves are the function, the making of waves on the fabric of spacetime
But why does the super-jets, super-heated,jettisoned from super-galaxy become the signature of black hole.
But the SAME giant object, not a supposed black hole, can eject same jets!!
What i see is that Dark Energy & Dark Matter & Dark Flow are needed to prop up Einsteinian dogma.
I think that it is just the usual runofthemill doginthemanger kind of global auto knee-jerk conspiracy.
I assure you there is a way how to translate that amazing equation of imaginative Dr. Einstein into simple math that high school students can understand.
Why do you say that the detected speed of gravitational waves and light waves, both with electro-magnetic property,
on ejected super heated jets of super-galaxies are the same, and if both are detected , how do LIGO re- assure that both have same speed of light.
Final query: why do you say that the same speed of gravitational waves and light waves affirm black hole. LIGO never said that ..
For this reason, all of mainstream
physics, chemistry, and biology combined forces to bury this data by any means possible, including
intimidation, character assassination, and outright lies.
Can you repute the proofs/ evidences I presented?
When u fraudulently work backwards to make a nonsense equation spit out a desired number
so he played around with the menu to get the number.
then it wont work in any other case, ie every other case, eg Venus.
And now of course that recipe dont work for any other planet, badly, in the case of Venus Alby's precession aint even in the correct direction. And for Mars he gets 1 arcsec instead of 10 arcsec.
Can we translate his equation in simple math equation very understandable to all. Please do.
Thus do show us the simple math equation that is easy to understand. That equation is right.
hard to understand
But the astronomical equation can translated into simple high school math equation