I think you have misunderstood the point Alan was making.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
In my personal opinion, since time is derived from periodic motion of our planetary system the new reference time unit would have new value. So speed of light will have a different value either larger or smaller...The rotation of our planetary system was ok historically, but contains too many variations to be a modern standard. By 1950s there were so many adjustments that it was abandoned in favour of more stable standards eg atomic vibrations.
The reason is time dilation. If it is a fact that G is varying then the common factor is time and this is relativistic.1. You are using the wrong reference frame
So looking from the centre of galaxy the sun has a relativistic velocity and time setting our solar reference frame. But we are rotating the sun so our relativistic velocity and time when viewed from the magnetic centre of the galaxy will vary as is evident from the G readings.
... what is the world trying to cover up?No one is trying to cover anything up.
...........why is everyone lying to me?
You are not considering before and after and recorded results,
before a coin toss the result is 1/2 ,
if you recorded the results of the coin toss and kept the results hidden, then asked someone to pick a result, the chance is not 1/2 any more.
the chance is ? out of ?
How many heads or tails are in the above number of throws?
You cant answer it can you?
If a neutron, which is a hypothetical particle, has no known force field, it should not be possible to detect it.Many chemicals and particles can be detected by their reaction to other materials.
thanks colin , but how does the magnetic vector perpendicular to axis of polariser can pass through , only those components will pass which are parallel to axis of polariser . in that case, wouldn't be electric and magnetic vibrations in same plane .Most polarising materials act only on the electric field either blocking or passing both components of the wave. The magnetic part doesn't have to 'pass' because the changing electric field and the changing magnetic field are an integral part of the wave, if you stop one you stop the other.
Yes Colin exactly , so what is the P of an event from the Y axis Colin?I don't intend to repeat answers that we have already given that you choose not to read
P(A)=σ² using a Y axisThis is why I have given up on your theory.
y is infinite Colin not limited, the above was just an example. It is actually x^∞=ythis x^∞=y is also gibberish.
Duality of pure motion devoid of mass; Always in the act of being positive and negative at the same time and quantity. With mass then being in the same or different form as well as a same or different time with respect to each other.This is dissapointing, I thought from the opening post you might have a serious question.
I just located this: 漢字仮名交じり文 ... on the dark side, can't make head nor tail of it, any thoughts?It is dangerous to post things like this, The Box will use it as maths, particularly if no one can make heads or tails of it.
scenario - Imagine a 3 lane motorway, you are in the most left lane, above each lane every 5m is a number 1,2, or 3 in no specific order.I'm loathed to get back into this as it has been thoroughly covered in the other thread
drive down the motorway in the same lane. Got it now, imagine this scenario,
x ⊥ y means x has no factor greater than 1 in common with y.This means that y cannot be x^1, x^2, x^3, etc
x=52So according to this y=x^1, x^2, x^3, etc
Quote from: alancalverd on 24/08/2015 23:00:12
what does "A is ^x" mean ?
Where does it say that?
But in answer any specific variant to the power of x,