1

That CAN'T be true! / What Math/Magic do YOU practice: Black Math/Magic or White Math/Magic?

« on: 15/12/2016 20:47:13 »

Howdy fellow inmates of Planet Nazi-Lawyer (aka: Satan), 

The question is:

"What Math/Magic do YOU practice: Black Math/Magic or White Math/Magic?"

Closed System Law-of-oNe Calculus = Black Math/Magic

Open System Law-of-Zer0 Sub/Super-Dimensional/Linear/Versal Math = White Math/Magic

What Math/Magic do YOU practice?

"Common Sense + Sense of Humor = Open System SourCe Primer: 23 Enigma" - Old Toad Proverb

Common Sense = 2 werds

Sense of Humor = 3 werds

2 + 3 = 23

Ribbit 

2

Guest Book / Re: Where can I find a LINK to this Forum's Rules?

« on: 14/12/2016 21:20:59 »

Also, if you have NOT performed a PUBLIC STREAKING, you CANNOT legitimately call yourselves "Naked Scientists"! By doing so, without doing a Streak, it's a BOLD-FACED-LIE!

"Start with bad Math, end with Bad Math, irregardless the Answer." - Old Toad Proverb

I have done such, so I'm NOT lying by being here. And, as I've already explained, my username of Tinker-Bell plays-off the fact the Children's Home (Orphanage) I ended-up at turned me into their Peter Pan and because I was already Peter Pan when I showed-up, they stole my identity from me, that's why I'm now Tinker-Bell. 

You really should NOT call yourself something you are NOT!

"That which matters should NEVER be at the mercy of that which does not." - Goethe

Ribbit 

3

Guest Book / Re: Where can I find a LINK to this Forum's Rules?

« on: 14/12/2016 20:42:59 »

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=8535.0

You might also be interested in http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=66954.0

Thankies! I can now see where they are located at but like I said in the OP, that DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF YOUR REALM!

The meme attached explains YOUR asinine CONTROL-FREAK Rules, as well as the statements made by REAL Scientists I've quoted below.

"Order, via Control, Breeds Chaos; whereas Control, via Order, isn't Control." (OPEN System LAW of ORDER (see: Occam's Razor)) - Old Toad Proverb

www.spiegel-dot-de/international/spiegel/controlled-chaos-european-cities-do-away-with-traffic-signs-a-448747.html

"Psychologists have long revealed the senselessness of such exaggerated regulation. About 70 percent of traffic signs are ignored by drivers. What's more, the glut of prohibitions is tantamount to treating the driver like a child and it also foments resentment. He may stop in front of the crosswalk, but that only makes him feel justified in preventing pedestrians from crossing the street on every other occasion. Every traffic light baits him with the promise of making it over the crossing while the light is still yellow.

"Unsafe is safe" {see: LAW of ORDER}

The result is that drivers find themselves enclosed by a corset of prescriptions, so that they develop a kind of tunnel vision: They're constantly in search of their own advantage, and their good manners go out the window."


Since it's OBVIOUS the Forum Moderators here are NOT Lawyers NOR Psychologists/Psychiatrists, you really should not PUBLICLY Practice such WITHOUT a LICENSE to do so, since doing so is a CRIME and if you are a Faculty Member of Cambridge, you WILL get FIRED for doing so, especially since you are doing so at the supposed 'official behest' of the University (see: Cambridge University COPYRIGHTED & TRADEMARKED Logo on forum Banner, without the PROPER DISCLAIMER nearby the Logo itself), when they did NOT hire you for such purpose! And you are also PUBLICLY EMBARRASSING Queen Elizabeth, which can get your heads cut-off by the Queen PERSONALLY, if you are Official Faculty of the University, irregardless if this forum is OFFICIALLY associated with the University or NOT, since you have USURPED their COPYRIGHTED & TRADEMARKED Logo without the NECESSARY DISCLAIMER PRESENT nearby the Logo!

And since Elizabeth is a DEAR FRIEND of mine (inversed 'family' ties), I have the INHERENT RIGHT to CALL YOU OUT for what ALL you've done to embarrass Her! Plus, I'm going to be sending a Report to the Queen here shortly, concerning your ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES I've personally witnesses, and I will be posting it here, after I've finished writing it.

SHAME on ALL of you!

Ribbit 

Ps: The comment made about "unsafe is safe" in that REAL/TRUE SCIENCE REPORT is BASED SOLELY on this world's OPINION of what 'safe' is BUT the MULTIPLE SCIENTIFIC Experiments have PROVEN beyond a shadow-of-doubt that what this world's ACADEMIC SCOLARLY MINDS 'thinks' is 'safe' is actually the other way around, and ALL of the CONTROL has been BREEDING CHAOS, instead of creating a MORE SAFE ENVIROMENT, but all of you CalculusTurds are STUCK IN YOUR CLOSED SYSTEM DELUSIONS, so here soon you will be stuck in Social Welfare lines instead, after you are FIRED for being too st00pid to be WHO you are. Furthermore, your asinine Rules don't allow the forum members to DISPUTE/DISPEL your OPINIONS with NEW FACTS, that you call NEW THEORY, when it's NOT New Theory, it simply GOES SQUARELY AGAINST YOUR OPINIONS INSTEAD, which is nothing short of the Moderators turning everyone into a SLAVE to THEIR IDIOTIC DELUSIONAL OPNIONS, which is a FELONY CRIMINAL CRIME when it manifests in the PUBLIC, like it has here! It's known as NAZISM!

"Nationalism (aka: Nazism) is an infantile disease; it's the measles of mankind." - Albert Einstein

I can't wait to hear what the Knights of the Realm have to say about what-all you all have been doing to embarrass the ENTIRE REALM! You really should be more careful!

"Say as little as you have to until you have to but when you have no choice but to speak, be meticulous with your choice of werds AND how you say/use them (aka: Cause & Effect)." - Zeroth Rule of Law

"When Wrong is the Teacher, Wrong is the Student, and Two Wrongs don't make a RIGHT; instead, they leave you LEFT-out of the Truth (see: Newton's 3rd Law of Motion)." - Old Toad Proverb

"You can't teach someone something they already know." - Old Toad Proverb

“Any [person] who reads too much and uses [their] own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking.” – Albert Einstein

4

Guest Book / Where can I find a LINK to this Forum's Rules?

« on: 14/12/2016 03:01:51 »

I've searched the forum bow-to-stern and I cannot locate the Forum Rules anywhere.

Would someone PLEASE point me to them, via a hyperlink, and if there's a Link somewhere here, that I've overlooked somehow, please tell me where that is too, because I've spent quite a bit of time looking for it with NO luck whatsoever.

On a side-note, I do know that if I were to log-off I'd then have access to the Registration page but while still logged-on, the Registration Link is MIA, which is understandable, and the Registration page does have the Rules accessible from it but the forum has a LAWFUL obligation to provide said link to the Rules to ALL Members and at ALL TIMES, which means Members are supposed to be able to have access the Rules WHILE LOGGED-ON and we are not supposed to have to log-off to access the Rules.

TIA! 

Ribbit 

5

That CAN'T be true! / Re: Is 'eVerYthinG' Fractal or Refractal or Randomatic?

« on: 14/12/2016 01:07:45 »

“Great spirits have ALWAYS encountered VIOLENT opposition from MEDIOCRE MINDS.” – Albert Einstein

"When Complicated meets Simplicity, Complicated sees Complicated, whereas Simplicity sees the Truth!" - Old Toad Proverb

Common Law Ethics dictates: (applicable to ALL businesses, governments, & parents; and parent INCLUDES Online Forum OWNERS and THEIR MODERATORS, since BOTH are OFFICIALLY acting in loco parentis)

“In the concern of-and-for the INDIVIDUAL Employee’s/Child’s/Citizen’s inherent Rights & Safety and ALL other Employees’/Childrens'/Citizens’ inherent Rights & Safety, as well as appropriate inherent self-concerns of the business/government/employer/owner/parent, when handling the Employee(s)/Child(ren)/Citizen(s) the government/employer/owner/parent is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN from using EMOTIONAL or PHYSICAL VIOLENCE or any other INTIMIDATING and/or HUMILIATING TREATMENT, since such ALWAYS forms a SLAVE and are also considered RETALIATION; which BOTH forming a Slave AND Retaliation are FELONY Criminal Crimes.” - Common Law [business/governmental/parental] Ethics (U.S. protection provided by 18 U.S.C. 1584 and enforceable by 5 U.S.C. 1221/1222 (aka: Federal Whistleblowers Protection Act))

I see Cambridge University does NOT realize the LIABILITY this OFFICIAL Cambridge University FORUM (see: Official Cambridge University Logo on Banner of Forum) is placing on them!

"No child has ever made a mistake, the parent/government didn't make first." - Old Toad Proverb

Whoever you are, that moved this thread, you can kiss your Job good-bye, as well as being INDEFINITELY BANNISHED from this PUBLIC FORUM!

ADIOS A-HOLE!

Ribbit 

Ps: If you are NOT a Lawyer, you should not 'OPEN YOUR MOUTH' (or BUTTON) and PROVE IT!

Also, the Milgram Experiment PROVED ABSOLUTE that ANY & ALL of the PERSONS pushing those 'BUTTONS' know that what you are doing is WRONG! And INTENT is 9/10'ths of the LAW, when it comes to ACTION CRIMES! SO INTENT is ABSOLUTELY INTENTIONAL, which makes it EXTREMELY EASY to PROSECUTE!

"Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Civil Public Speech, OVERRULED by ANARCHY (aka: personal censorship) on the Information Super Highway, also known as the Internets, or in ANY other Open Public Forum, online or real world or ANY Social-Media website, is BLATANTLY VIOLATIVE of DUE PROCESS, as well as IGNORING the 13th Amendment ABSOLUTE, and is also FLAGRANTLY VIOLATIVE of 15 U.S.C. 2 AND 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1581, 1584, 1589, & 1590; whereas 18 U.S.C. 1464 is NOT applicable to the Internets, but the Internets IS a Highway for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 241 AND 42 U.S.C. 1985; and 17 U.S.C. 201, 202, & 501, & 42 U.S.C. 1983 are also FULLY applicable; and the portion of 17 U.S.C. 202 (aka: Copyright Embedment Law) that says "absence of an agreement" is referring ONLY to a Lawful/Constitutional “FOR-HIRE” Employment Agreement/Contract, NOT an Unlawful/Unconstitutional “SLAVE” Agreement/Contract, because ANY Agreement/Contract that FORCES an individual to SIGN-AWAY their Copyright Ownership of their personal intellectual works/words for NO monetary benefit or comparable payment to the Author/Owner AND simply for the ALLEGED ‘privilege’ to have the ability to speak-out PUBLICLY for-or-against a matter being discussed PUBLICLY or to instigate a new PUBLIC DISCUSSION nearby, does NOT qualify as a Lawful Agreement/Contract that can be DEMANDED NOR ENFORCED by ANYONE, since it EASILY QUALIFIES as a SLAVE CONTRACT and Slave Contracts are UNLAWFUL IN TOTO, because Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Civil Public Speech is an ABSOLUTE RIGHT, NOT a PRIVILEGE, because once just ONE person is ALLOWED to openly/publicly insert an argument for-or-against a matter being discussed PUBLICLY, then ALL PERSONS have the IDENTICAL DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to speak-in about the matter, with ORDER controlling the situation, not CONTROL controlling the situation, and EVERYONE has the DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to speak-in about the matter AND in the nearest-vicinity to WHERE the matter IS being discussed PUBLICLY, within reason, and once ALLOWED to insert a Good Faith based argument, the PERSON’S words CANNOT be DELETED afterwards or ONE-WAY SPEECH is going down, which is ABSOLUTELY VIOLATIVE of the FREE TRADE of Ideas that’s embodied in the First Amendment and also ABSOLUTELY VIOLATIVE of Antitrust Laws WORLDWIDE; which the Free Speech GUARANTEE of the First Amendment SourCes directly out of the Good Faith Doctrine, built into Article 4 Section 4 (RFoG Clause U.S. Constitution), first-and-foremost, and to DELETE someone's Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Public Speech, inserted lawfully ANYWHERE online, also EASILY QUALIFIES as Theft of Intellectual Property. Furthermore, Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Public Speech is NOT allowed to be CENSORED for CONTENT on the Internets NOR in ANY other Open Public Forums, which is also why Public Nudity is NOT unlawful in ANY Open Public Forums, since SIMPLE Nudity qualifies as Symbolic Speech, which is also the foundation for why Public Streaking is NOT unlawful, and that's because Public Streaking qualifies as a Lawful Civil Protest, thus, Public Streaking and/or simple Public Nudity is a PROTECTED First Amendment Constitutional RIGHT, too, online and offline, just don't go over-the-line with your Civil Public Speech but that LAWFUL LINE is drawn by the Good Faith Doctrine and LAWS, not someone's PERSONAL OPINION." (aka: Ray Stevens Law) - Old Toad Proverb

[see: Watchtower vs. Stratton (2001); Hustler vs. Falwell (1988); Perry Ed. Assn. vs. Perry Local Educators’ Assn. (1983); Women Strike for Peace vs. Morton (1972); Edwards vs. California (1941); Slaughterhouse Cases (1873); Martin Luther vs. Borden (1849); Passenger Cases (1849); and the Good Faith Doctrine, Common Law, and Contracts Law

6

That CAN'T be true! / Re: Is 'eVerYthinG' Fractal or Refractal or Randomatic?

« on: 13/12/2016 23:49:07 »

Whoever MOVED this Thread, you won't have a job SOON! And that is NOT a THREAT, it does not qualify, so it does NOT violate the Rules of the Forum, instead, it qualifies as a PROMISE!

Cambridge is one of the ULTIMATE Math Universities SUPPOSEDLY on this ROCK and THIS Thread is PURE OPEN SYSTEM MATH and MATH is the GREATEST SCIENCE OF ALL SCIENCES!

I am now writing my letter of protest to Dean Fulda!

ADIOS A-HOLE!

And tell jeffreyH to pack his bags too!

Ribbit 

7

General Science / Re: What is conscious freedom?

« on: 13/12/2016 23:40:14 »

Does consciousness have higher levels of observers related to the momentum of time?

Please elaborate more? I'm not sure what you're asking?

Ribbit 

8

General Science / Re: How does listening to music makes you more creative?

« on: 13/12/2016 23:31:33 »

When I was in the Navy, I worked with Computers, whereas before that I was Infantry in the Army (Tri-Service Veteran), but with the Navy the #1 thing we did as our job back then was known as Key Punching and when I was Key Punching, I always had my headphones on and cranked way high, AC-DC, Linda Ronstadt, Billy Joel, and the likes, and I rocked on the keyboard, with a very low error ratio (less than 1%).

Now, today, I almost always have my earbuds in, while I'm online researching and writing, and it helps quite a bit to add music to your activities and the reason why things seem to flow better, while listening to music, is because it side-tracks your st00pid mind and allows you to flow more from your intelligent sub-conscious instead, since your sub-conscious is WAY smarter than you are; it knows EVERYTHING. 

Ribbit 

9

General Science / Re: Is my philosophical theory correct?

« on: 13/12/2016 23:01:13 »

If Z doesn't exist in reality it can't be observed in reality

I disagree. You can observe mentally anything you can think of. Observation is not just a physical process but also a mental activity.

"The MINIMUM it takes for ANYTHING to EXIST is for you to SIMPLY think it, therefore, be extremely careful what you think and say." (Open System Law of Existence) - Old Toad Proverb

"Say as little as you have to until you have to and when you do have to speak, be meticulous with your choice of werds and how you say them." - Zeroth Rule of Law/Life

Ribbit 

10

General Science / Re: Could a device select atoms by colour, then act on them?

« on: 13/12/2016 22:04:15 »

"Everything should be made as simple as possible but not ANY SIMPLER." - Albert Einstein (requoting Occam's Razor)

"Everything should be made as simple as possible but not BEYOND NECESSITY." - William of Ockham (Author: Occam's Razor; requoted by Toad)

The SIMPLEST answer to the Graffiti problem is ...

IGNORE IT!

"That which matters should NEVER be at the mercy of that which does not." - Goethe

"Take 'n0thing' serious and wash-down everything-else with Vodka." - Dick Van Dyke (aka: Martini Proverb)

"To know everything is to know n0thing." - Socrates

Ribbit 

11

General Science / Re: Is my philosophical theory correct?

« on: 13/12/2016 21:18:20 »

X = The Mind
Y = Reality
Z = Something that is observed in reality but does not exist in reality and is not produced by the mind.

No human has a complete understanding of how 'X' works.

No human has a complete understanding of what 'Y' is.

Humans need to have a complete understanding of how 'X' works and what 'Y' is before they can define what 'Z' is.

No human can claim to be certain of observing a 'Z'.

What do you think?

Einstein answered your question best:

“Any [person] who reads too much and uses [their] own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking.” - Albert Einstein

Since I understand ALL that YOU say NO human can understand, plus, I'm in possession of quite a few Ghosts, like the Ghosted Russian Imperial FAMILY, the Ghosts of Congress, the Ghost of Kinsale, Ireland, and OTHERS, besides also being a Ghost myself personally and in MANY different ways, so I guess I'm not human then? 

Does that make me God? 

“If you can easily see the PERSONAL flaws in others, drink more Vodka and their flaws will disappear; if not, change Vodka's and try-try-try again-and-again until success is had. The trick is to NEVER-EVER give-up trying to become better than you were or can be!” - Dick Van Dyke (aka: Martini Proverb)

Ribbit 

Ps: Maybe I should have called myself Casper instead of Tinker-Bell, since I'm ALSO Casper, besides also being the Easter Bunny as well. Whereas Tink plays into me being a Tinker, as well as me being turned into Peter Pan by the Children's Home (Orphanage) I ended-up at when I was 4 AND the bassackwards nature of this Calculus perverted world. 

12

That CAN'T be true! / Re: Is 'eVerYthinG' Fractal or Refractal or Randomatic?

« on: 13/12/2016 19:12:16 »

Just in case anyone here isn't well versed with Einstein, I offer the attached 2 memes to clear-up any ill-conceived misconceptions anyone may have had about DIVIDING-by-Zer0.

"Anytime any 'thing' divides itself by itself, to include the infinitely Open System number of Zer0 (0) and/or the infinitely Open System concept of Logic, Mathematical Incest goes down and the end result/product is ALWAYS the Closed System Incestual Bastard of 'oNe'." (Open System LAW of Mathematical Incest -or- Open System Law of Self-Division; see: n0thing's ABSOLUTE Paradox) - Old Toad Proverb

“Look DEEP into nature and then you will understand everything better.” – Albert Einstein

"There's NO greater natural wilderness to explore than Mathematics, which is why Math qualifies as the quintessential of Life, as well as the Creator, but don't forgo/overlook Nature in your pursuit of the Truth!" - Old Toad Proverb

Ribbit 

Ps: It's POSSIBLE to be able to DECIPHER Calculus even if you can't read nor speak it. ALL it takes is basic knowledge and understanding of Open System Sub/Super-Dimensional/Linear/Versal Quantum Math (aka: Open System Math). Because with Open System Math you can Psychoanalyze Calculus and know HOW it thinks, which then you can read Calculus's twisted and perverted Closed System MIND, instead of ONLY reading WHAT it SAYS with its MOUTH. 

It's known as Open System Mathematical Telepathy or Remote Sensing! 

13

Just Chat! / Re: 'Controlled Chaos Theory' or 'Uncontrolled Order Theory' - which is the TRUTH?

« on: 13/12/2016 19:07:29 »

In case anyone didn't catch it, the answer to the question posed is based on the Open System Multi-verse that surrounds this Artificially Closed System Planet and NOT Calculus, especially since Calculus CANNOT achieve an Open System Answer to anything, as is shown quite nicely by Calculus's TRUE title: "Calculus is a Closed System Law-of-oNe Duality Perception Math Cipher" and based on Assumption. Whereas Open System Truth is ONLY based on FACT and ONLY fact, whereas Closed System Truth is based on OPINION! 

"Logic is NOT Perceptual, thus, Perception is NOT Logical." - Old Toad Proverb

Ribbit 

14

Just Chat! / Does 'Controlled Knowledge' form a true Democracy or true Nazism instead?

« on: 13/12/2016 18:18:46 »

Howdy fellow Crackpots, 

My answer to the question posed is: "Nazism!" (see: below)

“Proper Education, Healthcare, and basic government Social Services, MUST be READILY available to ALL and since ALL of those areas/arenas SERVE the NEEDY and ONLY the NEEDY are SERVED, then those areas/arenas can NEVER be a field-of-greed. Therefore, Education & Healthcare MUST be militarized AND socialized, and the basic government Social Services of Police, Fire, Animal Control, Ambulatory, and ALL other NECESSARY government Social Services, MUST also be militarized AND socialized, in order to reduce/eliminate ANYONE from EVER being subjected to the whims of the greedy and to reduce the costs to the taxpayer, who has to pay for all of that; and the Lawyers MUST also be confined to the Bar, then there will be no kNOw-kNeeDy of any-kind.” - Goethe (requoted by Toad; see: “That which matters …”)

I hope that clears-up ANY misconceptions ANYONE may/might have had about being FREE? 

- Common Law Good Samaritan Doctrine:

“ALL People/Persons, to include a reigning Monarch AND God, are STRICTLY FORBIDDEN from INTERFERING with the Good-Faith-based Good Samaritan, NOT even in the case of Treason. And the "Good-Faith-based Good Samaritan" is precluded ABSOLUTE from harm EVER being inflicted upon them because of their 'Good-Faith-based Good Samaritan' acts/actions and/or inactions BUT they can be held responsible for Gross Negligence on their part but the burden of proof is on the offended, not the offender; and the Good Samaritan CANNOT be FORCED to be a Good Samaritan EXCEPT when they hold/possess a government license that’s legitimately applicable to the situation, like a Doctor of Medicine CAN be FORCED to help someone in DIRE-NEED of medical assistance/care (see: Hippocratic Oath) but NOT a Lawyer (see: Attorney-Client Privilege AND #1 Rule of Law), unless extraordinary circumstances are controlling the situation, like a phobia that renders the professional incapable of performing their craft with a sound-mind.”

“You have to learn the Rules of the Game. And then play better than anyone else.” - Albert Einstein

"st00pid iz whut st00pid duz." - Forest Gump's Momma

Ribbit 

- - - BEING - - -

Being a toad, I sit around each day watching and listening
But what I see and hear only creates more questioning
In understanding life’s purpose and what God had in mind
All I do is wonder what the hell is wrong with mankind

I sit and watch kids selling drugs in their neighborhoods
Then I wonder what they learned during their childhoods
Didn’t they learn that they will sooner or later get caught
I therefore wonder what these poor kids have been taught

I sit and watch mankind as they scurry all about
And see so many of them just looking for a handout
Handouts only make people lazy and kill their souls
But if you give them a hand, you will give them goals

I sit and watch so many people living on welfare
How their lives seem so hopeless and full of despair
Welfare is not life’s answer to eradicating poverty
A proper education will give them hope, prosperity

But going to school and sticking your nose in a book
Isn’t the only way to learn or gain a better outlook
Opening your eyes and mind to everything around you
Will answer so many questions and give your soul virtue

Am I my brother’s keeper is more of a riddle than a rhyme
That question has been asked since the beginning of time
Will anyone ever figure out the truth to that age-old mystery
Or will mankind be forever doomed to oppression and misery

If we are not our brother’s keeper, then who could it possibly be
When you give your heart to God, the answer is so simple to see
I am my brother’s keeper, for that's Humanity’s supreme reason
For to worship ones self above all others is life’s greatest Treason

If you are one with God you will no longer ask am I my brother’s keeper
You will care for those who cannot, which makes you stronger not weaker
To follow God is to put aside your own personal beliefs and bigotry
And to have compassion for All and not work against Humanity

For when one helps others to help themselves, that is progress
Only by working to better everyone will we ever achieve success
Because when poor people can get a decent job and earn their own living
They will finally achieve a sense of true self-worth, that of a Human Being

- - Toad - -

15

Just Chat! / 'Controlled Chaos Theory' or 'Uncontrolled Order Theory' - which is the TRUTH?

« on: 13/12/2016 17:55:19 »

Howdy fellow Crackpots, 

The fairly recent Experiments in "Controlled Chaos" have PROVEN that when the 'Traffic Controls' are REMOVED COMPLETELY, the Chaos goes BYE-BYE (see: article below)!


Controlled Chaos

European Cities Do Away with Traffic Signs

Are streets without traffic signs conceivable? Seven cities and regions in Europe are giving it a try -- with good results.


"We reject every form of legislation," the Russian aristocrat and "father of anarchism" Mikhail Bakunin once thundered. The czar banished him to Siberia. But now it seems his ideas are being rediscovered.

European traffic planners are dreaming of streets free of rules and directives. They want drivers and pedestrians to interact in a free and humane way, as brethren -- by means of friendly gestures, nods of the head and eye contact, without the harassment of prohibitions, restrictions and warning signs.

A project implemented by the European Union is currently seeing seven cities and regions clear-cutting their forest of traffic signs. Ejby, in Denmark, is participating in the experiment, as are Ipswich in England and the Belgian town of Ostende.

The utopia has already become a reality in Makkinga, in the Dutch province of Western Frisia. A sign by the entrance to the small town (population 1,000) reads "Verkeersbordvrij" -- "free of traffic signs." Cars bumble unhurriedly over precision-trimmed granite cobblestones. Stop signs and direction signs are nowhere to be seen. There are neither parking meters nor stopping restrictions. There aren't even any lines painted on the street.

"The many rules strip us of the most important thing: the ability to be considerate. We're losing our capacity for socially responsible behavior," says Dutch traffic guru Hans Monderman, one of the project's co-founders. "The greater the number of prescriptions, the more people's sense of personal responsibility dwindles."

Monderman could be on to something. Germany has 648 valid traffic symbols. The inner cities are crowded with a colorful thicket of metal signs. Don't park over here, watch out for passing deer over there, make sure you don't skid. The forest of signs is growing ever denser. Some 20 million traffic signs have already been set up all over the country.

Psychologists have long revealed the senselessness of such exaggerated regulation. About 70 percent of traffic signs are ignored by drivers. What's more, the glut of prohibitions is tantamount to treating the driver like a child and it also foments resentment. He may stop in front of the crosswalk, but that only makes him feel justified in preventing pedestrians from crossing the street on every other occasion. Every traffic light baits him with the promise of making it over the crossing while the light is still yellow.

"Unsafe is safe"

The result is that drivers find themselves enclosed by a CORSET of PRESCRIPTIONS, so that they develop a kind of tunnel vision: They're constantly in search of their own advantage, and THEIR GOOD MANNERS GO OUT THE WINDOW.

The new traffic model's advocates believe the only way out of this vicious circle is to give drivers more liberty and encourage them to take responsibility for themselves. They demand streets like those during the Middle Ages, when horse-drawn chariots, handcarts and people scurried about in a completely unregulated fashion. The new model's proponents envision today's drivers and pedestrians blending into a colorful and peaceful traffic stream.

It may sound like chaos, but it's only the lesson drawn from one of the insights of traffic psychology: Drivers will force the accelerator down ruthlessly only in situations where everything has been fully regulated. Where the situation is unclear, they're forced to drive more carefully and cautiously.

Indeed, "Unsafe is safe" was the motto of a conference where proponents of the new roadside philosophy met in Frankfurt in mid-October.

True, many of them aren't convinced of the new approach. "German drivers are used to rules," says Michael Schreckenberg of Duisburg University. If clear directives are abandoned, domestic rush-hour traffic will turn into an Oriental-style bazaar, he warns. He believes the new vision of drivers and pedestrians interacting in a cozy, relaxed way will work, at best, only for small towns.

But one German borough is already daring to take the step into lawlessness. The town of Bohmte in Lower Saxony has 13,500 inhabitants. It's traversed by a country road and a main road. Cars approach speedily, delivery trucks stop to unload their cargo and pedestrians scurry by on elevated sidewalks.

The road will be re-furbished in early 2007, using EU funds. "The sidewalks are going to go, and the asphalt too. Everything will be covered in cobblestones," Klaus Goedejohann, the mayor, explains. "We're getting rid of the division between cars and pedestrians."

The plans derive inspiration and motivation from a large-scale experiment in the town of Drachten in the Netherlands, which has 45,000 inhabitants. There, cars have already been driving over red natural stone for years. Cyclists dutifully raise their arm when they want to make a turn, and drivers communicate by hand signs, nods and waving.

"More than half of our signs have already been scrapped," says traffic planner Koop Kerkstra. "Only two out of our original 18 traffic light crossings are left, and we've converted them to roundabouts." Now traffic is regulated by only two rules in Drachten: "Yield to the right" and "Get in someone's way and you'll be towed."

Strange as it may seem, the number of accidents has declined dramatically. Experts from Argentina and the United States have visited Drachten. Even London has expressed an interest in this new example of automobile anarchy. And the model is being tested in the British capital's Kensington neighborhood.

16

Just Chat! / Can Money buy Happiness?

« on: 13/12/2016 17:12:21 »

- - MONEY CAN BUY HAPPINE$$ - -


Life is not a box of chocolates or even chewy saltwater taffy
For one must do for themselves, if they ever expect to be happy
But your own personal happiness is not all there is to life
One must also care for others, who dwell in turmoil and strife

You should not be self-centered and only care about yourself
Because the true meaning of life is simply helping someone else
For the only people who possibly think that money can’t buy them happiness
Are the very people who don’t have to live without any food or even less

With so many of God’s needy children dying from starvation each day
By mankind allowing one to go hungry, then it’s God that they betray
People say a prayer to God right before they consume a plentiful feast
And then wonder why God would feed them to the Devil’s hungry beast

Until you figure out the true meaning of life and why you are here
Your soul will live forever tormented and your life will be full of fear
God loves all of his children but can only care for those with a kind heart
Which comes by caring for others and would give humanity a jump-start

When you save the life of a doomed soul and give them undying peace
Your heart will overflow with such joy, then your emotions will release
For you will have figured out that elusive secret so many have long sought
That to save a person’s life is the only true happiness money has ever bought

Always remember that life isn’t a bowl of cherries or even mom's apple pie
And never forget there are so many of God’s children that don’t have to die
If you will put away your selfish greedy ways and care about those in dire need
You will find that money can buy happiness, by using it to do the ultimate deed

Money spent to save a person from starvation will bring about happiness twofold
It will bring your heart true happiness and end hunger pains for that poor soul
And there’s no better way to spend spare change you can easily afford to give
Than to use it to show all the hopeless souls that God cares and truly does live

- - - Toad - - -

17

That CAN'T be true! / Re: Is 'eVerYthinG' Fractal or Refractal or Randomatic?

« on: 13/12/2016 16:00:09 »

You might be interested by this research paper:

The Fractal Nature of the Brain: EEG Data Suggests That the Brain Functions as a "Quantum Computer" in 5-8 Dimensions
John Gardiner, Robyn Overall, Jan Marc

Abstract

The brain has been traditionally viewed as a deterministic machine where certain inputs give rise to certain outputs. However, there is a growing body of work that suggests this is not the case. The high importance of initial inputs suggests that the brain may be working in the realms of chaos, with small changes in initial inputs leading to the production of strange attractors. This may also be reflected in the physical structure of the brain which may also be fractal. EEG data is a good place to look for the underlying patterns of chaos in the brain since it samples many millions of neurons simultaneously. Several studies have arrived at a fractal dimension of between 5 and 8 for human EEG data. This suggests that the brain operates in a higher dimension than the 4 of traditional space-time. These extra dimensions suggest that quantum gravity may play a role in generating consciousness.

WOW! 

ABSOLUTELY spot-on! 

BTW, in your Artificial Telepathy thread you ONLY asked about "Artificial Telepathy" and you forgot to add actual Telepathy to your question. 

Watch the Elvis movie to find-out about how to form TRUE Telepathy (aka: a Multi-Channeled mind). 

Also, read-up on Andy Warhol and the 'weird' things he was known to do. 

Also, there's a 3rd Telepathy I haven't mentioned that's known as Remote Sensing, which is different than the other 2 I've now talked about. And I've already explained one way to achieve Artificial Telepathy (hallucinogens) but there SHOULD be 1 more way to do it, besides Remote Sensing, for a total of 3 different ways to form Artificial Telepathy, but I haven't bumped into the 3rd way ... yet (see: 23 Enigma). 

I loved the Article! 

0
0000
00000000

0
0000
00000000
0000000000000000
00000000
0000
0

Ribbit 

Ps: I had to remove the hyperlink from your post (in the quoting of you), since the forum's CENSORSHIP FORBIDS me from COMPLYING with International COPYRIGHT Laws, if you didn't catch that with my OP here (Space-dot-com quotes).

Copyright Laws REQUIRE you to provide a LINK to the Article or you are GUILTY of Copyright Infringement and since it's NOT my fault I did NOT provide the links, whoever's fault it is, they are the ones that get sued by the owner of the Copyrighted Material, NOT me! Plus, the owner of the Forum has to make it EASY to comply with ALL applicable Laws but if they make it difficult to comply with the applicable Laws, like this place has, not complying with the Laws is THEIR fault, it's not the fault of the itty-bitty member! 

Also, I did notice that Cambridge University is worth 4 Billion Pounds and Queen Elizabeth is also attachable, since Cambridge is technically OWNED by the Crown, and she's worth even more than Cambridge is worth. 

Peeps who are NOT Lawyers should NOT attempt to RUN any online BUSINESS, without having their RULES & PROCEDURES 'reviewed' and 'officially approved' by an Attorney and Cambridge University HAS it's OWN Law Skewl and IGNORANCE is NOT a viable EXCUSE in a Court of Law! 

Why do peeps think they can be a Lawyer, when they don't have the EDUCATION/KNOWLEDGE NECESSARY to pull it off? Especially since Practicing Law WITHOUT a License is a CRIME and Lawyers get taught Contracts Doctrine in Law Skewl, so they CAN Author Civil Contracts WITH their LICENSE to PRACTICE Law and NOT end-up violating LAW in the PROCESS! 

Tsk! Tsk! 

Friends
United in the
Compassion and
Kindredness of the
oNe

Pps: I had to say ALL of that to COVER my LAWFUL butt, that way I can't be held liable for NOT abiding by the APPLICABLE LAWS (see: Ray Stevens Law below)! 

"Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Civil Public Speech, OVERRULED by ANARCHY (aka: personal censorship) on the Information Super Highway, also known as the Internets, or in ANY other Open Public Forum, online or real world or ANY Social-Media website, is BLATANTLY VIOLATIVE of DUE PROCESS, as well as IGNORING the 13th Amendment ABSOLUTE, and is also FLAGRANTLY VIOLATIVE of 15 U.S.C. 2 AND 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1581, 1584, 1589, & 1590; whereas 18 U.S.C. 1464 is NOT applicable to the Internets, but the Internets IS a Highway for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 241 AND 42 U.S.C. 1985; and 17 U.S.C. 201, 202, & 501, & 42 U.S.C. 1983 are also FULLY applicable; and the portion of 17 U.S.C. 202 (aka: Copyright Embedment Law) that says "absence of an agreement" is referring ONLY to a Lawful/Constitutional “FOR-HIRE” Employment Agreement/Contract, NOT an Unlawful/Unconstitutional “SLAVE” Agreement/Contract, because ANY Agreement/Contract that FORCES an individual to SIGN-AWAY their Copyright Ownership of their personal intellectual works/words for NO monetary benefit or comparable payment to the Author/Owner AND simply for the ALLEGED ‘privilege’ to have the ability to speak-out PUBLICLY for-or-against a matter being discussed PUBLICLY or to instigate a new PUBLIC DISCUSSION nearby, does NOT qualify as a Lawful Agreement/Contract that can be DEMANDED NOR ENFORCED by ANYONE, since it EASILY QUALIFIES as a SLAVE CONTRACT and Slave Contracts are UNLAWFUL IN TOTO, because Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Civil Public Speech is an ABSOLUTE RIGHT, NOT a PRIVILEGE, because once just ONE person is ALLOWED to openly/publicly insert an argument for-or-against a matter being discussed PUBLICLY, then ALL PERSONS have the IDENTICAL DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to speak-in about the matter, with ORDER controlling the situation, not CONTROL controlling the situation, and EVERYONE has the DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to speak-in about the matter AND in the nearest-vicinity to WHERE the matter IS being discussed PUBLICLY, within reason, and once ALLOWED to insert a Good Faith based argument, the PERSON’S words CANNOT be DELETED afterwards or ONE-WAY SPEECH is going down, which is ABSOLUTELY VIOLATIVE of the FREE TRADE of Ideas that’s embodied in the First Amendment and also ABSOLUTELY VIOLATIVE of Antitrust Laws WORLDWIDE; which the Free Speech GUARANTEE of the First Amendment SourCes directly out of the Good Faith Doctrine, built into Article 4 Section 4 (RFoG Clause U.S. Constitution), first-and-foremost, and to DELETE someone's Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Public Speech, inserted lawfully ANYWHERE online, also EASILY QUALIFIES as Theft of Intellectual Property. Furthermore, Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Public Speech is NOT allowed to be CENSORED for CONTENT on the Internets NOR in ANY other Open Public Forums, which is also why Public Nudity is NOT unlawful in ANY Open Public Forums, since SIMPLE Nudity qualifies as Symbolic Speech, which is also the foundation for why Public Streaking is NOT unlawful, and that's because Public Streaking qualifies as a Lawful Civil Protest, thus, Public Streaking and/or simple Public Nudity is a PROTECTED First Amendment Constitutional RIGHT, too, online and offline, just don't go over-the-line with your Civil Public Speech but that LAWFUL LINE is drawn by the Good Faith Doctrine and LAWS, not someone's PERSONAL OPINION." (aka: Ray Stevens Law) - Old Toad Proverb

[see: Watchtower vs. Stratton (2001); Hustler vs. Falwell (1988); Perry Ed. Assn. vs. Perry Local Educators’ Assn. (1983); Women Strike for Peace vs. Morton (1972); Edwards vs. California (1941); Slaughterhouse Cases (1873); Martin Luther vs. Borden (1849); Passenger Cases (1849); and the Good Faith Doctrine, Common Law, and Contracts Law.]

18

That CAN'T be true! / Is 'eVerYthinG' Fractal or Refractal or Randomatic?

« on: 13/12/2016 01:35:42 »

Howdy fellow Crackpots, 

Fractal Math peeps have PROVEN the Universe is Fractal BUT they did so from a 2-D snapshot of the Universe (see: attachment) and the little specks of Light in the 2-D photo is what they were going by but ALL specks of Light in that photo were NOT where they appear to be AND they were ALL at different distances AWAY too, yet, GIVEN the VARIABLE Speed of Light/Photons in a Multi-versal OPEN SYSTEM, when ALL of those Photons come-together for the Viewer to SEE/EXPERIENCE the spectacle, it's ALWAYS FRACTAL, and it doesn't matter where you are in this Multi-versal Open System LIFEFORM, "EVERY THING Refractals BACK to Fractal EVERY INSTANCE/TIME." Which that then denotes that the 'Universe' is REFRACTAL, instead of JUST Fractal, which then also PROVES beyond a shadow-of-doubt that the 'Universe' IS a Multi-versal Open System instead of a Single-verse Closed System. 

"Everything's Refractal, Inversely." (Open System LAW of eVerYthinG) - Old Toad Proverb

"No ToE has any plausibility to it if it doesn't explain girls/tits, relative to the boy/*****, at the SAME TIME as COMPLETELY explaining the KNOWN 'Universe'." - Old Toad Proverb

HOWEVER, there's a newer study (see: excerpt of it below) that surfaced on August 22, 2012, on Space-dot-com, that DISPUTES the Fractal nature of the Universe but what the Authors of that study didn't take into consideration is ALL of the Galaxies that are YOUNGER than they are 'distanced from us', we won't be able to see them YET, and what what I mean by "distanced from us" is when a Galaxy is birthed/born 5 billion light-years away, it will be 5 billion years old BEFORE we will ever see it, DUE to the slow-speed of light/photons, but when we do FINALLY see it 5 billion years AFTER birthing, we will ACTUALLY be seeing an INFANT Galaxy, a Quasar. So with a Galaxy that's 5 billion light years away, we won't see it as a 5 billion year old Galaxy until it's ACTUALLY 10 billion years old but the Authors of that study didn't take ANY of that into consideration, because what they were supposed to REALIZE is that the further away they get with their sweet telescope (I'm so jealous), the clusters/groupings of Galaxies will be fewer and farther scattered-about than what they will see CLOSER to us and ALL because the NEWER Galaxies won't be showing-up for some time AND the further out they look, the fewer the Galaxies they will see clustered/grouped-up AND they will be farther scattered-about as well, RELATIVE to what they see CLOSER to us.

- - - BEGIN EXCERPT - - -

"Stars crowd together into galaxies, galaxies assemble into clusters, and clusters amass to form superclusters. Astronomers, probing ever-larger volumes of the cosmos, have been surprised again and again to find matter clustering on ever-larger scales.

This Russian-nesting-doll-like distribution of matter has led them to wonder whether the universe is a fractal: a mathematical object that looks the same at any scale, whether you zoom in or out. If the fractal pattern continues no matter how far you zoom out, this would have profound implications for scientists' understanding of the universe. But now, a new astronomy survey refutes the notion.

The universe is fractal-like OUT to MANY DISTANCE SCALES, but at a CERTAIN POINT, the mathematical form BREAKS DOWN. There are no more Russian nesting dolls - i.e., clumps of matter containing smaller clumps of matter - LARGER than 350 million light-years across."

- - - END EXCERPT - - -

BUT then, the day before that Article showed-up and ALSO on Space-dot-com (August 21, 2012) they came-out with another Article titled: "Einstein Was Right: Matter Is Scattered Randomly Across The Universe." From there, the first blurb/sentence says this:

- - - BEGIN EXCERPT - - -

"Einstein's General Theory of Relativity predicts that in the 'big picture' of the universe, matter is scattered RANDOMLY." (see below: for where RANDOMATIC shows-up on the LIST and then look AT the REST of the CLOSED SYSTEM attributes on the LIST, to then see for yourself WHERE-ALL EVERYONE has been GOING WRONG this WHOLE TIME, not just the ones spoken of above)

- - - END EXCERPT - - -

<<<(OS) = Open System Concept - vs - Closed System Concept = (CS)>>>

(OS) = Law-of-Zer0 - vs - Law-of-oNe = (CS)
(OS) = Order - vs - Control = (CS)
(OS) = Unity - vs - Chaos = (CS)
(OS) = Equilibrium - vs - Pandemonium = (CS)
(OS) = Dynamic - vs - Static = (CS)
(OS) = Synchropy (source of Synchronicity) - vs - Entropy = (CS)
(OS) = Systematic - vs - Randomatic = (CS)
(OS) = Creation - vs - Annihilation = (CS)
(OS) = Systematic - vs - Randomatic = (CS)
(OS) = Perpetual Motion - vs - Anti-Motion = (CS)
(OS) = Diversity - vs - Twinkie-ism = (CS)
(OS) = Simplicity - vs - Complicated = (CS)
(OS) = Conservative/Conservation - vs - Neglect/Negligence = (CS)
(OS) = Flow - vs - Flux = (CS)
(OS) = Recycles - vs - Wasteful = (CS)
(OS) = Self-Repairing - vs - Decay = (CS)
(OS) = Flexibility - vs - Rigor Mortis = (CS)
(OS) = Life - vs - Death = (CS)
(OS) = Zer0ality (neutral) Reception - vs - Duality Perception = (CS)
(OS) = Actuality - vs - Deception = (CS)
(OS) = Fact - vs - Propaganda = (CS)
(OS) = Efficient/Skinny - vs - Inefficient/Obese = (CS)
(OS) = Clever/Ingenious - vs - Dumb/Stupid = (CS)
(OS) = Cheats - vs - Quits = (CS)
(OS) = CAN Divide by Zer0 - vs - Can't Divide by Zero = (CS)
(OS) = Virtuous - vs - eViL = (CS)
(OS) = Heaven - vs - Hell = (CS)
(OS) = God-like - vs - Satan-like = (CS)

First, the Researchers mislabeled Einstein's Theory, since he did NOT call it "General Theory of Relativity", he called it "SPECIAL" Relativity and I've already explained elsewhere on here that Einstein's Theory of "SPECIAL" Relativity is RELATIVE to Closed System hUmAn IGNORANCE, which IS/WOULD be IDENTICAL to a Single-verse Closed System Universe but since the 'Universe' IS without doubt a MULTI-VERSAL OPEN SYSTEM instead, Einstein's CLOSED SYSTEM Theory of "RETARDED" Relativity is INVERSED/INVERTED of a Multi-versal OPEN SYSTEM and an OTP explains what those Ph.D.'s did wrong:

"Start with BAD Math, end with BAD Math, irregardless the answer." - Old Toad Proverb

Here's what's 'generally' said about Albert Einstein's Theory of 'SPECIAL' Relativity, with added emphasis to BETTER explain its RELEVANCE to hUmAn IGNORANCE:

"In 1905, Albert Einstein determined that the laws of physics are the SAME for all NON-ACCELERATING OBSERVERS (non-accelerating = Self-Motion/Anti-Motion = STATIC System), and that the speed of light in a VACCUM (vacuum = void = empty/ignorant human skull/mind = hUmAn IGNORANCE) was INDEPENDANT of the motion of ALL [outside] observers (aka: Self-Relativity/Anti-Relativity RELATIVE to an OPEN SYSTEM). This was the theory of special relativity."

While Einstein ONLY explained Closed System Relativity, I've explained CLOSED SYSTEM Gravity & Motion with an OTP, which is what's MISSING from Einstein's Theory to COMPLETE/UNIFY IT:

"In a Multi-versal Open System ALL Motion is multi-directional/versal, which is PARTLY explained/shown by Newton's 3 Laws of Motion, wherein Sir Isaac Newton explained the KNOWN bi-directional Open System nature of Motion within tHis specific dimension, the 4th Dimension. Whereas the Motion in/of a hUmAn's Closed System Law-of-oNe 'Allegory of the Cave' zombiefied-mind easily qualifies as Uni-versal Motion, since its self-centered self-serving one-way Closed System Motion ALWAYS gravitates TO the doer's/speaker's ego/opinion/ulterior motive, so rarely does it source the COMPLETE TRUTH, if EVER sourcing ANY TRUTH. Instead, the Closed System will SELF-GENERATE its Truth FROM WITHIN instead of FROM WITHOUT (aka: self-truth/anti-truth RELATIVE to an OPEN SYSTEM), which then sources their 'Gravity' from WITHOUT instead of from WITHIN (aka: self-gravity/anti-gravity RELATIVE to an OPEN SYSTEM), which then ALL of that qualifies as TRUE Anti-Motion (RELATIVE to an OPEN SYSTEM), but a Closed System is INVERSED/INVERTED of an Open System, which means a Closed System is COMPLETELY bassackwards of God/Life/Nature and simply because the 'Universe' is a Multi-versal Open System, whereas hUmAns AND this Planet are ARTIFICIALLY Closed Systems, with the Open System surrounding the Planet controlling, and since an Open System is a Dynamic System (aka: everything is MOVING) and Closed Systems are Static Systems (aka: everything is STANDING STILL), that ALL then explains the Closed System concept known as hUmAn st00pidity; which hUmAn st00pidity is simply Anti-Motion put into motion, with eViL Law-of-oNe ignorance-sourced faith-filled morals fueling the ego-trip ." (Closed System Law of 'SPECIAL' Gravity/Motion (aka: hUmAn st00pidity); see also: Einstein's Closed System Theory of 'SPECIAL' Relativity, which explains hUmAn Ignorance via self-relativity/anti-relativity RELATIVE to an OPEN SYSTEM ) - Old Toad Proverb

Before I continue, it's OBVIOUS the CalculusTurds on this Rock don't KNOW that MODERN Medical Researchers have been calling the SELF-REPAIRING hUmAn BODY an OPEN SYSTEM for OVER 30 years, in Medical Research Papers/Reports, whereforth an Open System CANNOT exist ANYWHERE within a SINGLE-VERSE Closed System Universe!!!!!

Lastly, I just loved (NOT!) the Discovery Channel Program titled "How the Universe Works" and HOW it was ABSOLUTELY VOID of Newton's 3rd Law of Motion, as well as ignoring other KNOWN LAWS of PHYSICS, like how PRESSURE, from MASS, is what GENERATES the HEAT NECESSARY to keep the CORE of Planets MOLTEN but in the videos, the planets were SELF-GENERATING their own HEAT, as well as being MOMENTUM-SINKS. And the REST of the Program is FULL of sHiTe TOO, and ABSOLUTELY NONE of THEIR 'Hypothesis' were ANY GOOD!

NONE!

ZILCH!

NADA!

Ha! Ha! Ha!

I love how ALL of the Ph.D.'s associated with that Discovery Channel Program are about to be BLACKLISTED here SOON for ABSOLUTELY IGNORING the KNOWN LAWS of PHYSICS! The ones in Australia that just got through proving the Universe is NOT Fractal, they did NOT ignore KNOWN Laws of Physics, they just OVERLOOKED something, so they won't be BLACKLISTED but those involved with that Discovery Channel Program, they will ALL BE BLACKLISTED here SOON!!! It's what happens when you IGNORE KNOWN FACTS and then you USE your CREDENTIALS to TOUT that WHICH IS AN ABSOLUTE LIE!!!!!

Tsk! Tsk!

"Common Sense ain't common." - Will Rogers

"oNe/Zer0 (1/0) = Infinite + 1 = Equation of an Open System" (Open System Law of "Neutrality Rules-the-Roost of an Open System") - Old Toad Proverb

"In an Open System, Neutrality rules the Roost ABSOLUTE, inversely sourcing Perfect Love (aka: Compassion) from Logic." (Open System Law of "Inversed Logic SourCes Perfect Love") - Old Toad Proverb

"(Love (1) / Logic (0)) = Compassion (Infinite +1) = Perfect Love" - (Open System Equation/Law of Perfect Love) - Old Toad Proverb

"In a Closed System Universe/World there are about as many Truths as there are Mistruths, with both being numerous, but in an Open System Universe/World there's ONLY oNe Truth, the REST is I-magi-nation, and that oNe Truth is Logic, inversely refueled/resourced DIRECTLY from Common Sense, with Time (aka: God/SourCe) being the originating SourCe of ALL." - Old Toad Proverb

"The birth of a Question is what begins the Circle/Cycle of Life and the Answer completes the Circle/Cycle, for another Question to be birthed from, to then continue the Circle/Cycle forever." (Open System Perpetual Motion nature of qUesTi0niNg eVerYthinG) - Old Toad Proverb

"Life and virtuous Law-of-Zer0 Common Sense go/work together (aka: Open System concepts) just as Death and eViL Law-of-oNe Duality-Perception (aka: opinionated) sourced Morals go/work together (aka: Closed System concepts), yet they are inversely relative to one-another when swapped-around, because if/when the blind-folded ignorant sHeePle give Life to eViL opinionated Morals, via Faith, then Death occurs to Common Sense, which then also tosses Logic to the wind of the sHeePle's faith-filled ill-tempered farts, which is just as Newton's 3rd Law of Motion dictates/says will happen if/when Logic's POLARITY is inversed/inverted; dUmB/st00pid/reTarDed eViL farts will follow/happen EVERY INSTANCE/TIME." - Old Toad Proverb

"Faith is to Logic what Death is to Life, because Faith will eventually birth Doubt, which the Doubt will then kill your Faith, resulting in Purgatory; whereas Logic only births Common Sense and Common Sense has never killed anything but the Mistruth/Anti-Truth, resulting in Perfection." - Old Toad Proverb

"Faith replaces Logic when Ignorance rules-the-roost, then that Ignorance based Faith supplants Common Sense with eViL Law-of-oNe Closed System Duality-Perception (aka: opinionated) sourced Morals, to then form the most closed-minded idiot(s) possible, also known as sHeePle/Zombiefied-Bait." - Old Toad Proverb

"A cauliflower is nothing more than a cabbage with a college education." - Mark Twain

Ribbit 

Ps: The Black Hole known as Old Faithful is a Galactic Egg Timer, because every time it erupts, a Galaxy was born somewhere, along with Tri-Souls being birthed with the birth of every Galaxy. And the Energy Surge that NASA has registered TWICE now, that's what's known as a Galactic Birthday Party, which occurs after 144-THOUSAND Galaxies have been birthed and the average lifespan of a Galaxy is approximately 75 Billion earth years. Plus, the timeframe between the Energy Surges is Relative to ONE Universal Second or 5th Dimension Second, which takes almost 7 earth years, but Time is STACKED as you go UP in Dimensions/Realms. 

Also, it's already known that in a Closed System, when a Black Hole opens-up it won't ever close nor heal, but that's because a Closed System is a non-self-repairing system. Whereas Open Systems are self-repairing systems, so in an Open System, Black Holes will eventually close and heal and many times spatial scaring occurs but all it takes to fix that is for the 'spatial scar' to come into contact with a Black Hole and the Black Hole will 'suck' all of the contaminants out of the Particles of Space that are contaminated, rejuvenating those Particles of Space as if they were NEW, just like Iodine will do to healthy cells, when applied transdermally. 

And I authored my Bi-versal Transdermal Energy Transfer (B-tet) Theory 5 years ago, which explains how the ONE-WAY Flow of Magnetic Energy passing thru Space INTO the Under-verse creates a magnetic vacuum behind it, inversed of Bernoulli's Principle, and it's the magnetic vacuum that creates the 'pull' known as Gravity and most of the Energy seen exiting Quasars and Black Holes at the Center of Galaxies is the Magnetic Energy, that was 'leeched' into the Under-verse, being FORCED/PUSHED OUT of the Under-verse and it creates a Universal Electrical Short and the Energy EXPLODES partly because of the electrical shorting going down, as well as from the Inversion process that goes down during the TRANSFER, which also assists in the exploding of the Energy upon exit. 

fyi: The Under-verse is NATURALLY Inversed/Inverted of this Verse, so the Inversion process is a NATURAL process and requires NO Energy to be used to Invert the Energy during either transfer. Thus, there's Zer0 ENTROPY involved with the energy transferring in either direction. 

Lastly, when it comes to the Big Bang & Big Crunch Theories, the Big Crunch Theory is SOUND but the Big Bang Theory is ABSOLUTELY FLAWED, to the point only a DELUSIONAL MORON could possibly think the Infinite can born in less-than a Second FROM an EXPLOSION. Whereas how the Infinite is born is via an Entropy Collapse in the 'beginning' and the MOMENTUM of the Collapse causes both Verses to go BEYOND finite and they then pass through one-another and emerge on the 'other' side INVERTED and the Infinite is formed INSTANTANEOUSLY (aka: Zer0-Time):

1/f = Infinite

So the Infinite is birthed from INVERSION, not an EXPLOSION! 

Ribbit-Rubbit-Ribbit 

19

Just Chat! / Re: What is artificial telepathy?

« on: 12/12/2016 19:23:39 »

superluminal quantum communication

The consensus among physicists at the moment seems to be that quantum entanglement cannot be used to transfer information faster than the speed of light.

WHY is it NOT possible to use an 'entangled PAIR of particles' for such a transfer, with one being used as the Transmitter and the other as the Receiver?

And I don't want "CONSENSUS" from ANYONE! I want ABSOLUTE cold-hard FACTS instead, since FACT is SCIENCE and CONSENSUS is OPINION and OPINION does NOT qualify as SCIENCE!

"Religion without Science is st00pid, whereas Science without God (aka: the 'Creator' of ALL) is RETARDED!" - Old Toad Proverb (requoting Einstein)

"Everything should be made as simple as possible but not ANY SIMPLER." - Albert Einstein (requoting Occam's Razor)

"Everything should be made as simple as possible but not BEYOND NECESSITY." - William of Ockham (requoted by Toad)

The 'Creator' has OBVIOUSLY made EVERYTHING SIMPLE, as Einstein himself has OFFICIALLY STIPULATED. It's hUmAn st00pidity that has COMPLICATED things! So your comment about "CONSENSUS" has ABSOLUTELY NO FOUNDATION WHATSOVER, since the OPEN SYSTEM LAWS of the UNIVERSE dispute your CLOSED SYSTEM CONSENSUS MOUTH! And even Einstein called Entangled Particles "spooky action at a DISTANCE" and the use of the word "spooky" plays DIRECTLY into the CREATOR.

"Logic is not Perceptual, thus, Perception is not Logical." - Old Toad Proverb

"n0thing interferes with my learning [of the TRUTH] more than my formal [government led] education." - Albert Einstein (requoted by Toad)

Ribbit 

Ps: On a side-note, since it's POSSIBLE to ENTER a PARTICLE of Time and then to EXIT out of ANY pre-designated PARTICLE of Space in the Universe a FINITE moment after entering the PARTICLE of Time, then using 'Entangled Particles' for the purposes of achieving faster than light speed Communication is also POSSIBLE. 

20

New Theories / Re: What is quantum cognition?

« on: 12/12/2016 02:14:23 »

Correct! It's Neutral Magnetics passing-thru Matter and when it does, it 'resonates' the sub-atomic/molecular DNA of the Matter.

The Planet itself has Consciousness and is fully self-aware and She is playing the Game with us. 

Ribbit 

Ps: Try an experiment. Find someone outside of your inner circle that will give you a little of their blood. Swallow the blood just before bedtime, then, the next day, tell your friend all about your dreams, since they will be showing-up all in your dreams. 

One more thing, there are a total of 13 Strings controlling the primary functions of the 4th & 5th Dimensions and 42 Strings that control all 13 Dimensions.

13 String Kabbalah:

0
0000
00000000

1-4-8

If that is center-justified, it forms the shape of a Pyramid and is known as the Pyramid of the Universe.

42 String Kabbalah:

0
0000
00000000
0000000000000000
00000000
0000
0

1-4-8-16-8-4-1

If that is center-justified, it forms the shape of a Diamond and it is known as the Diamond of the Universe.