21

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What falls faster: heavy or light objects?

« on: 01/10/2020 17:34:51 »

This is how it works:
1) inertia of small objects
2) inertia of bigger objects
The small objects must  fall faster because of its small inertia
3)) force of gravity on small objects
4)force of gravity on bigger objects
The small objects must  fall slower because of small gravity force
a=F/m
In this equation:
Acceleration" a" increase for a small mass m , but at the same time gravity force F decreases for smaller m then " a "is constant
In the same equation:
Acceleration decreases for bigger mass m , but at the same time force of gravity F for the bigger mass  increases then "a"is constant
This constant acceleration "a" is 9.8 m/sē makes two different masses with same height fall at the same time.

22

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 17/09/2020 17:04:41 »

This is an accurate test giving maximum 8 kg force for calves muscles .And in the video I can raise and move my body 57 kg several movements effortlessly ,exerting force less than or equal to the maximum 8 kg.The force used to raise and move my body is far less than my massive weight. .

23

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 11/09/2020 10:45:00 »

So each one of my calf muscles easily lifts much more than 31 kilograms (because that's not counting the weight of my own body).

I don't know what an average person can carry and how stronger you are  .What you are doing is feeling how easy it is .If you lift your body with calves muscles" , you will find out you will  literally not  exert effort on lifting your body and you will do it many times.

 

hen I tried to see if I could still stand on my tip-toes despite carrying all that extra weight around.

I could. Without much trouble, either.

My idea includes  small normal force on toes and that will give small pressure on toes and that why you could stand on toes tips

24

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 10/09/2020 20:05:29 »

Your foot is on one end, but what is holding the other end of the scale?

At the end of the iron bed.

25

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 10/09/2020 19:54:26 »

I am still trying to work out what he thinks that video shows.

OK
Pressing the scale is equivalent to pressing the ground in lifting .I press the scale of maximum"17 kg one leg" and I left myself with far less than 34 kg"two legs" because I actually didn't exert that maximum effort as in the video

26

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 09/09/2020 15:19:28 »

and a true test

It's a flawed test. The fact that you can lift your own weight with your feet is proof enough that you are producing at least as much force as your own weight. The laws of physics demand it. The laws of physics don't change just because you don't properly understand them.

The force is 34 kg for both legs , it will be 34 kg raising 57 .and I only used force far less than the maximum as in the video.
If what you say affects,  then the measuring can' happen because my leg will move to the right side.

27

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 04/09/2020 23:57:50 »

That being said, I've lifted and carried around approximately 60 kilograms at my job on multiple occasions. I'm far from a body-builder.

Then you agree of what I say.You carry your 60 kg several times at your job while a bodybuilder can't , because you need small force to move your body than a body building uses to lift the same mass

28

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 04/09/2020 23:21:47 »

Just another thing of such a stupid scientist he will be happy that he flies jumping with a rock of 60 kg while this rock is hard for bodybuildings

29

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 04/09/2020 22:59:33 »

The usage of energy as F*d  is wrong

Please demonstrate this.

I only need to demonstrate my great new discovery with its obvious observations,logical arguments and a true test
I'm sure no scientist will think he is carrying his body like carrying a rock or he is stupid.

30

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 04/09/2020 22:45:09 »

No, If 15  kg raises 60 kg, there is a scientific explanation in which the idea 15 kg lifting 60 kg agrees with the law of conservation of energy.The idea is force vs force not work vs work .

You could use that to create net energy (I explained how), so conservation of energy is still violated.

The usage of energy as F*d  is wrong .Energy comes from a human being.

31

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 04/09/2020 21:23:07 »

If a person lifts his body he will need small force of 15 kg

You have absolutely zero evidence for this

I have a very strong evidence .

I use less than the maximum 17 kg to raise my 57 kg weight.
So why do you ignore this?

There is very strong evidence against it (I posted how it can be used to violate conservation of energy).

No, If 15  kg raises 60 kg, there is a scientific explanation in which the idea 15 kg lifting 60 kg agrees with the law of conservation of energy.The idea is force vs force not work vs work

32

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 30/08/2020 11:49:22 »

Then you are, as usual, ignoring the fact that lifting a 60 kilogram rock is equivalent to your legs lifting 120 kilograms total,

If we consider for example the force to lift a mass is usual but what actually decrease is the mass ,For instance if the mass is 60 kg let's treated it as a 15 kg one . If a person lifts his body he will need small force of 15 kg .If a person try to lift another rock of 60 kg he will need greater force one is his body 15 kg and the other one is the rock 60 kg a total of  75 kg  lifting a mass is absolutely greater than lifting a body "15 kg vs 75 kg " your example is only 120 half  which will not gives noticeable results  but the observation is very noticeable. "15 vs 75"

Of course it's harder to walk while carrying a 60 kilogram rock than it is to carry a 60 kilogram body

Are you aware what a 60 kg mass is ? it is 10 kg times 6 , you can obviously hard to hold and walk  with your 10 kg suitcase .

33

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 29/08/2020 22:41:45 »

Your assertion breaks the laws of physics, so it cannot be correct.

Yes , the work against gravity appears to be smaller than the work exerted by mass downwards but this is only according to work being force times distance, but here the work exerted against gravity is the energy of a human being  .The idea of work being force times distance doesn't work here , the work here is the energy of a person .This is also a new physics law.
In the video by raising my body I will exert work greater than 17 times distance and equal to 57 times distance even though the work appears to be only 17 times distance.

34

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 29/08/2020 21:49:27 »

Your assertion breaks the laws of physics, so it cannot be correct.

It is true and this is supported by obvious observations and a test.
What I discovered is an exception for a human body mass.It doesn't "break" the laws of physics ,it is a new law of physics .

35

New Theories / Re: The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes

« on: 23/08/2020 23:41:26 »

My new great discovery can be tested to verify its validity ,so universities shouldn't neglect this great new discovery. and take it seriously.
Beside my logical observations above that shows small force can lift a massive human body here is an experiment to verify this in which only 17 kg force can lift my massive body of 57 kg , if my muscles force will lift another mass"not a human " it should use force  greater  than 57 kg.

:

 

36

New Theories / Why I have been neglected ?

« on: 20/08/2020 21:05:47 »

Why I have been neglected by discovering this new phenomenon ,These are obvious observations to prove that the force lifting human body  is less than the force lifting another object with the same mass:

An average  person can lift his body of 60 kg holding a bar many times but he will barely move a rock of the same mass 60 kg.

I can jump high raising my massive 57 kg  using only my thigh's muscles however I will not be able to even move a rock of 57 kg using all my body muscles.

A person can walk upside down on his weak arms lifting his 60 kg " average weight "massive body but he will not even be able to put the rock on his shoulders.

37

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How does static electricity work?

« on: 04/06/2020 10:35:17 »

The handle in fact is connected to the ground through the door .

Unless the door is metal and that metal as a conductor leading into the grown then its not grounded.

Both wood and soil and anything else can represent ground .So it is not the handle is connect to the ground through the door , it is the handle connected to the ground and ground here is the door.There is not difference in this case between wood and soil both are insulators.

Discharge doesn't only happen between a body and a grounded object.

The idea of connecting to the ground is that earth is neutral.As everything is ground then everything is neutral unless it is charged with positive or negative charge.Metal on earth is also neutral.Neutral metal when touching by charged object will give the spark and as I said metal can absorb charge.For a metal not touching earth also will be neutral and give the spark

38

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How does static electricity work?

« on: 03/06/2020 13:56:59 »

The handle in fact is connected to the ground through the door .speaking of touching  wood by your finger , wood doesn't have the capability to absorb charges like metals to give the shock .When you put your finger close to the handle  , the handle electrons will move from side to side in the metal and charge positive and when you touch , electrons will return again making both your finger and metal neutral and giving the shock, however when you put your finger close to the door it also be charged positive and develop attraction force but when touching , electrons will remain

39

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is the speed of light constant?

« on: 30/05/2020 17:53:20 »

Speed of light in vacuum is constant .Speed in a liquid is slow but also constant.speed of light doesn't slow down , it has constant speeds for each medium

40

Just Chat! / Re: Rock music

« on: 20/05/2020 17:32:11 »

I wonder what the thing under the rocks