The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Yahya A.Sharif
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - Yahya A.Sharif

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16
281
New Theories / Re: is Infinity reachable ?
« on: 28/03/2019 17:32:58 »
The process of space curvature can't happen at an instance it started and continues to happen by spreading the speed of spread might be speed of light.


282
New Theories / Re: is Infinity reachable ?
« on: 28/03/2019 08:52:55 »
Quote from: seeker3 on 28/03/2019 07:59:37
Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 28/03/2019 07:48:43
Quote from: seeker3 on 28/03/2019 07:46:34
There is no gravity between space and matter.
I didn't say that.I said mass still curving space and it continues.
Also mathematically we can't assign an infinite value to the gravity equation and there isn't a derivative way to solve the equation resulting in zero value for infinity.

How mass curves space? What is the mechanism?
That is another subject.What I claim is according to my argument gravity doesn't exist at some distance.

283
New Theories / Re: is Infinity reachable ?
« on: 28/03/2019 07:48:43 »
Quote from: seeker3 on 28/03/2019 07:46:34
There is no gravity between space and matter.
I didn't say that.I said mass still curving space and it continues.
Also mathematically we can't assign an infinite value "distance" to the gravitational equation so that the equation results in zero value for gravity.

284
New Theories / Re: is Infinity reachable ?
« on: 28/03/2019 07:32:32 »
It's only if gravity still spreading into space and didn't reach a point for which it would equal zero and still spreading.
for each mass it has a real number range of gravity, beyond that its gravitational force doesn't exist perhaps it is still making curvature to space

285
New Theories / Re: is Infinity reachable ?
« on: 28/03/2019 07:20:04 »
Quote from: seeker3 on 28/03/2019 07:14:50
Gravity is induced electrostatic attraction force between neutrally charges matters. Similar to sexual attraction among married couples.

Gravity is coexisting with matters, gravity don't spread.

Space is infinite, matter and energy are conserved but infinite amount.
Then my argument shows contradiction between space being infinite and and gravity being infinite
When gravity equals zero what happens to space at that point does it spread ? then we would have another infinity at which gravity doesn't equal zero.

286
New Theories / Gravity is limited to a range extendable with the speed of light c
« on: 28/03/2019 06:54:22 »
In calculating escape velocity from a mass gravity force of this mass at infinity is considered to be zero an object has specific amount of kinetic energy starts with the escape velocity from mass and stops at infinity
The potential energy is calculated from infinity at which force is equals zero

If gravitational force at infinity equals zero then we have a real number "zero" assigned to unreachable quantity "infinity" making it reachable but in fact infinity is unreachable so we can’t assign a zero quantity of gravity for an unreal number quantity which is infinite space. The gravitational field is real and it has an end equals zero there should be an end for infinite space, however there is not an end for infinite space making gravity reaches zero while space extends to infinity.

Also mathematically we can't assign an infinite value “distance” to the gravity equation resulting in zero value for gravity.

Even though in reality you can't reach infinity  it could be a thought experiment that is if gravity effects decreases continuously we have a limit for that decrement which is zero effect then gravity effect in fact has a limit but space doesn't so what happens at that limit when gravity force equals zero space would still be increasing.

For each mass it has a real number range of gravity this range is increasing continuously with the speed of light c , beyond that its gravitational force doesn't exist and it is still spreading out and making curvature to space

Mass curvature for space is a process it starts at the existence of mass continues with the speed of light c and will never reach an end. You can’t start a process and have its effect at infinite distances instantly, this process started as an event “mass existence” and has its effect gradually “spreading out with speed of light c”.Mass effect can’t reach infinity instantly.

The universe started at a moment in the past and all masses existed at a moment. Infinity doesn't have a limit it is continuous if mass bend continuous space-time, an event “mass existence" can't start and have its effect at infinite distance “no limits" space can't be bent infinitely because infinity is unreachable mass can't bend a point in space at infinite distance since this point can't be reached.
There are places in space still unbent that prove gravity has a range extendable gradually with the speed of light c.

Mathematical explanation:
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76598.0


287
Technology / Re: Will this energy storage tool work?
« on: 27/03/2019 17:15:58 »
What do you think?

288
Technology / Re: Will this energy storage tool work?
« on: 27/03/2019 17:08:07 »
For the 2 mm and the 10 cm the ratio would be 1:50 but I could use a gearbox of 1:10 on the wheel and another one of 1:10 on the generator giving a total ratio of 1:5000 if the generator is 60 Hz and the weight height is 4 meters ( I could use an inclined plane) the machine could last for 9 minutes and as the machine cheap I could multiply the numbers of this machine and obtain more discharge time.

289
Technology / Re: Will this energy storage tool work?
« on: 27/03/2019 15:20:02 »
even though it stores small amount of energy it could be very cheap:
https://www.amazon.com/Powerful-Neodymium-Magnets-Rare-Earth-Magnet/dp/B076RBS92F/ref=sr_1_7?crid=2NAMPKCK4ESKC&keywords=neodymium+magnets&qid=1553700561&s=gateway&sprefix=neod%2Caps%2C490&sr=8-7
Neodymium magnets are very strong they can give high force:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare-earth_magnet

290
Technology / Re: Will this energy storage tool work?
« on: 27/03/2019 08:50:38 »
The vibration could be slowly with 2 mm length giving motion from side to side for magnets #6 up to 10 cm length  or perhaps longer for lager magnets by that I could convert the short distance of the air compressor (or weight) to long distance motion just like my clockwork   https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=74333.0   
But this is cheaper and more practical.

291
Technology / Will this energy storage tool work?
« on: 27/03/2019 08:09:21 »

* Untitled.png (24.14 kB . 1334x1442 - viewed 1141 times)
The idea is four neodymium magnets at balance due to equality in attraction and repel force when the air compressor #1 moves from right to left it rotates the wheel #3 and the wheel vibrates the magnet it is contacted to causing imbalance to  the system of the magnets and causing the magnets # 6 to move from side to side as long as the magnet vibrates

292
New Theories / Re: Will this clockwork gravity storage be successful ?
« on: 25/03/2019 10:36:05 »
I should internationally be recognized as an inventor and my solution should be available in Wikipedia.
why no-one reacts to my posts and I'm ignored? what happens then if someone post something important in "New theories"? could any one respond to me? it is not shame if I'm wrong in my claims every theory in this section is invalid.

293
New Theories / Re: Will this clockwork gravity storage be successful ?
« on: 25/03/2019 04:48:58 »
There is also the steam engine...
it could be something like :
 A gearbox with high ratios with direct contact won't work due to huge energy needed to be transferred at an instance but if this energy is transferred in steps using Yahya's machine it would work
Another thing in engineering is there is not a way to transfer huge torque to very small one without using fluid but with Yahya's clockwork  we could use springs and gears
converting very very huge torque to very very small torque needs very very huge water containers so there is not a way to achieve it only by using Yahya's machine
All these are facts needed to spread as public knowledge and the owner should be recognized.
I do not need to build it all I did is converting huge torque to smaller one in anyway for the machine and all that is obvious

294
New Theories / Re: Will this clockwork gravity storage be successful ?
« on: 24/03/2019 16:41:03 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/03/2019 16:33:52
Well, if nothing else, your name is now documented alongside your machine here on this site and I doubt anyone else will try to claim it.
Is that everything? Is that all I get? I want to appear on Wikipedia and obtain awards

295
New Theories / Re: Will this clockwork gravity storage be successful ?
« on: 24/03/2019 16:32:19 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/03/2019 16:22:10
Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 24/03/2019 15:55:08
there is a lot of unused perpetual motion machine that are historical
Do you realise that perpetual motion machines do not work?
They do not work but they are unique machines and their owners are written in history because they invented something unique that did not exist before I invented something that didn't exist before something scientific I'm not comparing my machine exactly with perpetual ones My machine is not perpetual and works.

296
Technology / Re: Will this hacksaw design work?
« on: 24/03/2019 16:07:14 »
The picture....

297
Technology / Will this hacksaw design work?
« on: 24/03/2019 16:04:49 »
Will this hacksaw design work?
Would any one buy this hacksaw ?
So far I was able to list these benefits:
1) In my machine there are two springs to supply with enough pressing for easier cutting.
2) My machine has two blades to cut from both sides at the same time for faster cutting.
3) The blades in my machine are closed solving the problem of a loose hacksaw and causing cutting to be straight forward.
4) It is easy to use and can be used by anyone ; there is not a need for an  expert to cut straight forward.
5) The time the two blades last before replacement is double the time is needed for an ordinary hacksaw;we have two blades and they share cutting.
6) Using my hacksaw we can focus on moving the hacksaw and neglecting pressing; this will enable us to cut with faster speeds.


298
New Theories / Re: Will this clockwork gravity storage be successful ?
« on: 24/03/2019 15:55:08 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/03/2019 15:42:08
Quote from: Yahya Sharif on 24/03/2019 15:09:52
I should have credits for my discovery
Just as soon as anyone uses it.
Why the need to be used there is a lot of unused perpetual motion machine that are historical

299
New Theories / Re: Will this clockwork gravity storage be successful ?
« on: 24/03/2019 15:09:52 »
I should have credits for my discovery

300
New Theories / Re: Will this clockwork gravity storage be successful ?
« on: 24/03/2019 14:27:17 »
As well as huge energy which can't be transferred directly there is also huge speed both can be transferred in steps.

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.074 seconds with 64 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.