Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Have a look at the updated version.Your opinion offered without substantive factual backing.rely upon scientific evidence and many other facts revealing God.No such facts exist.
People may be mistaken about it.
The point s that if such proof actually existed, it would be known to all.
No such facts exist.
Your opinion offered without substantive factual backing.rely upon scientific evidence and many other facts revealing God.No such facts exist.
People may be mistaken about it.
He promised they would kill him long before they did. Why? He addressed that, too. Men love darkness, he said. He told the elite of his day that they were plotting to murder him because they were the children of satan. They got pissed, to put it mildly. He communicated like no one else in history. He spoke clearly as someone who was from another world.Sin is not just what is committed or omitted. It is inbred, a condition within each of usIt sounds like the God is a twit.
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image,
Oh, He is pure evil to many millions. That surprises you? They hated his guts. Still do. Hate. Murderous hatred. A large, vehement crowd, including many of society's most favored, demanded his blood. And they got it. John, his cousin, lost his head for calling sin, sin.
Sin is not just what is committed or omitted. It is inbred, a condition within each of usIt sounds like the God is a twit.
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image,
Well, that's good. We agree. Rational, perfectly sane, well adjusted people interpret and rely upon scientific evidence and many other facts revealing God.Or, what scientific data do you rely upon that proves they are all deluded?That's not what I said.
"Malice" is a legal term and God is not guilty of murder based on its definition.QuoteMalice is a legal term referring to a party's intention to do injury to another party.
So inflicting the plague of boils on Job, destroying Sodom and Gomorrah, The Flood, and every other recorded Act of God including the 230,000 deaths in the 2004 Sumatra tsunami were unintended? If your god isn't guilty of murder, he'd certainly be convicted of manslaughter.
Science proves God exists to some people.Do you mean in the sense that science also documents the fact that some deluded people think they are Queen Victoria?
It's true that the belief exists, but not true that they are a dead monarch.
Or are you trying to say that, to some people, science is proof of God?
Because that's just wrong.
Or are you trying to say that there is a group of people to whom science has proved the existence of God?
That's impossible.
Not at all. Just the opposite. "Malice" is a legal term and God is not guilty of murder based on its definition. Whether you acknowledge God is or isn't has nothing to do with His status as your God.Can you cite examples when your god kills with malice aforethought?Not having a god, I can't answer directly, but it is inconceivable that any omniscient and/or omnipotent deity would kill without forethought. Malice is a human judgement, but the imposition of anything from Job's plague of boils to the slow strangulation of cystic fibrosis or motor neurone disease would count as malicious in a court of law.
Non sequitur.
The existence of the sun is not evidence of my existence, let alone that of an invisible fairy.
Why hasn't science been able to prove the existence of God? I was A2A on a question about turning into an atheist at 13 years of age. It bothered me deeply and I came to question my own beliefs. I'm at a crossroad. Help me through logical answers.
How on Earth do you come to the conclusion that I am happy for people to die.Well, you don't seem at all upset about it.In what way do I glorify it.I don't know. But my guess is that you get up on Sunday + go to church to worship the biggest mass murderer we have ever known.
At any rate, you don't say we should despise Him for His actions.
When it is nighttime? During an eclipse? If it gets cold?I can't see it, because it's overcast.Duffyd: Nice to get back on topic. Please state the observables that can only be ascribed to your god. If your god is not the omnipotent, omniscient and anthropic creator of the universe (i.e. the familiar Judaeo-Christian-Islamic deity), please define its functionality.
Look to the sun.
Does that mean God ceased to be?
Duffyd: Nice to get back on topic. Please state the observables that can only be ascribed to your god. If your god is not the omnipotent, omniscient and anthropic creator of the universe (i.e. the familiar Judaeo-Christian-Islamic deity), please define its functionality.
Why hasn't science been able to prove the existence of God? I was A2A on a question about turning into an atheist at 13 years of age. It bothered me deeply and I came to question my own beliefs. I'm at a crossroad. Help me through logical answers.Your first question, "Can science prove God exists?" indicates you don't know the answer or you are open to finding out. Your second question, "Why hasn't science been able to prove the existence of God?", answers your first question definitively.