You generally say only "NO".Because you are generally wrong.Here is a science forum; do you know?Yes, I know this is a science forum.
Science is based on evidence.
You don't have any evidence.
So, what are you doing here?Your position becomes off-side (like singing from a distance).https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offside_(association_football)
Not very much like singing.If you have not any technical arguments. you never be usefull for the subject.
If I raise technical points like this oneNo, it can't- what you "measure" is what decision you made about the definition of simultaneous.And you pretend that I didn't, and repeatedly refuse to address technical questions then it's you who isn't useful.
So, why do you do it?
Why won't you address simple questions about what you have said?
Is it because you know that you have no good answer?
You can negative with arguments. It is a shame to say "you are wrong" directly; like declaring yourself a god (Can you distinguish and internalize this?). Einstein would not fall into similar error.
A new theory for light kinematics has been shared by me in scientific papers. LCS method analyzes the motions of light and light source (celestial objects) according to a common reference frame (that is most external frame: space vacuum or LCS). This method allows cosmological analyses (Light Kinematics to analyse space-time:
1- Those who have an idea without reading and learning like you will get the note "There are those who object to SR".
2- Some one can object for some points and discuss.
Other reactions refer to chauvinism or psychological problems (please don't understand wrong; like intolerance to new ideas) and they are ignored.
I will not answer without technical questions.