Well, one thing it might predict is that a pure vacuum will never be sustainable.
Aura theory predicts that if you could simulate a pure vacuum, you might be able to pull it off for a short amount of time, but you will never be able to sustain it because there will always be particles popping in and out of it.
Even if you could simulate this vacuum billions of light years from any known object, it still would not stay pure. There is an infinitely small probability that an objects particles billions of light years away will pop into this vacuum, but because object's are made of so many particles it will eventually become unpure.It might again become pure when the particles pop out, but it will never be a sustainable pure vacuum.
Many scientists today feel that antigravity and dark energy is real, for this reason I would like to try give an approach from the Aura theory.
We have established that an object's electromagnetic field could cause the auro property that is predicted by Aura theroy.
If the electromagnetic field was somehow reversed, then the object's aura would be turned inside out and would essentially be very weak closer to the centre of the object and very strong further away, obviously the strength will diminish with distance.
I feel any object that gets too close to an antigravity source will experience a strange but expected phenomenon. It's particles will be attracted to the higher strength auras which now lie further away from the antigravity source centre, so the object appears to be repelled. I use the word 'appears' because I believe the object is not being repelled it is simply pursuing higher auras which now lie further away from the antigravity source's centre.
What is happening at a particle level?
As Aura theory states, the particles have a high probability of moving into a high strength aura zone and vica versa, hence as the object approaches the centre of the antigravity source, more and more of its particles will appear on the opposite side of the object, slowly causing newtonian momentum which eventually changes the objects trajectory to move away from the antigravity.
What does this have to do with Dark Energy?
A bit of background.
Dark energy was discovered when scientists realized the universe's expansion was not slowing down as predicted by earlier scientists, but was in fact speeding up. They believe there is a strange energy causing this acceleration and they call it dark energy.
Aura theory predicts 2 possibilities for the explanation of dark energy.
First is that the universe's acceleration is a byproduct of antigravity left over from the big bang, possibly due to a massive antigravity source that lies at the centre of the universe.
Secondly it is equally possible that there is a strong electromagnetic field surrounding the universe, left over from the big bang as well and everything is being attracted towards it.
The Aura theory states that when two objects are attracted to each other via gravity, it is a mechanism that is happening on the particle level. This is because any object's particles will have a higher probability of moving into a stronger aura zone, possibly as an effect caused by an objects electromagnetic field.
If you could watch a planet getting sucked in by a star, in slow motion, on an atomic scale it would look as if the planets atoms were acting sort of like a slinky toy and moving towards the higher Aura stengths bit by bit. This slinky movement is a constant force, which on earth makes objects want to move towards the centre at 10ms2. The force of this movement causes newtonian momentum and hence a force downards.
If you could take a snap shot of any object moving through space, you would never have all the object's atoms in the photograph, this is because at any one time a percentage of the object's particles are on a quantum journey into a higher aura.
Why should particles want to act this way? Does this have anything to do with Dark Matter?
My belief is that particles want to actively pursue higher aura zones because it might be a property of the universe that can be seen in the forces of dark matter. An explanation...
Suppose a scientist understands that there is not enough matter in a faraway galaxy or galaxy group to hold it together. He realizes that the gravity inside it is too strong to be only attributed to the observable matter. This actually happens alot and science today recognizes that there is more matter there then they can see, and they call this dark matter.
My take on this is that if the scientist could count the number of particles inside the galaxy, he would notice that the number is constantly changing, this is because particles from elsewhere in the universe are popping in and out of it's aura. This constant shuffling between all the galaxies in the universe causes more matter to appear than should be there and hence explains why it might seem there is more gravity then should be there, but if you could take a complete snap shot of the entire universe you might just find that the number of particles in the whole universe is unchanging, just shuffling. So dark matter is just normal matter that has popped into the galaxies Aura and caused a bit more gravity then popped out again while other ones were popping back in.
A small diagram to help
[ Invalid Attachment ]
We have established that we believe the auro is a property of an object's electromagnetic field. A strong aura will be positively pursued by any object's particles. We know that particles have to leave home base because this is a law of the universe that states there is not enough matter to make up for all the gravity, so every particle keeps shuffling around to higher auras to make up.
We could work out the probability of where the particle might land up anywhere in the universe by formluating an equation that takes into consideration both distance and electromagnetic field strength of surrounding objects plus the object itself. Distance is included because I feel the particles will have a higher probability of popping into a closer aura than a further one.
So we can say that at this point we believe it is the electromagnetic field of an object that is casuing these predicted "Aura" zones.
Furthermore, one thing I just realized is that this means Black Holes must have an incredibly strong electro-magnetic field.
Also what this means, is that if we could decrease the electromagnetic field strength of an object, then we could also decrease it's pull of gravity?
Also this means that if there are any large objects with small magnetic fields then these objects should have a weak force of gravity as well, since a passing object's particles would have a low probability of entering it's Aura.
Ok, perhaps I can ask you to clarify something for me, I would be grateful.
In Quantum mechanics, I know that particles of an object 'jiggle about' and appear/reappear spontaneously.(well not spontaneously anymore if the theory is correct )
If I get your drift, then what you are saying is that this is already known to happen in the electromagnetic field? (I was actually not sure which medium this what happening when I initially posted).
If this is the case, then it would certainly be a way to go, and the aura property could just be a simple property that causes the particles to statistically appear closer to the center of an object's electromagnetic field when they go on their quantum journeys, and hence a planet getting pulled into a star seems to move and stretch in that direction because more and more particles are appearing in that direction.
I am sure I made a few mistakes, but I am so glad that I managed to get the essence through. I really like your suggestions, and I welcome any changes to the theory, the more brains that contribute the better!
I have an 'out there' theory that I like, I have thought about it for a few months but kept it to myself. I am not a scientist, and I am also realistic and know there are many very respected scientists in the world working on unification of quantum mechanics and gravity.
There are 2 parts to this theory, 'The Electromagnetic Aura' and 'The Electromagnetic Aura Gravity'.
The Electromagnetic Aura
- It is possible that there is a quantum aura surrounding every object in the universe. - This aura is thought to be a property of the electromagnetic field.(Credit : Vern) - The size of each aura is directly dependant on the amount of particles composing the object. - The strength of the aura will always be stronger closer to the center of an object. - Particles of an object pop in and out of its aura constantly(obeying quantum laws) - Particles of an object statistically have a higher chance of appearing in a high strength zone of an aura, and less chance of appearing in a weak strength zone. - Strong aura zones are closer to the centre of an object, and their strength is determined by the object's mass. - Weak aura zones will be further out, and can reach as far as the universe stretches, becoming infinitely weak with distance. - Particles of an object cannot leave the object's aura unless there is another object's aura to move into. - Particles of an object that leave it's aura must, at some stage, return back to the object from where they came. - Particles of an object that return to home base are not required to return to the same position from where they left. In fact particles prefer positions that are facing a high strength aura zone. - Particles know exactly where they would like to go when they pop out and back into reality, but they must obey a statistical law, which I believe is a law well known to science : Chaos law. - Chaos law affects particle movement in the Aura by preventing all particles from going exactly where they want(causing the whole object to teleport like science fiction), a percentage must go elsewhere to avoid this effect. - In this case, Chaos law has mercy for the particles, as enough of them are allowed to go and come near to where they want causing a movement we call 'the effect of gravity'.
Electromagnetic Aura Gravity
Once you have grasped the notion on object aura's then aura gravity becomes relatively easy to see.
Suppose an asteroid flies past a star too close and gets sucked into orbit, or worse crashes and burns, what really happened there on a particle level? Well, as we know gravity took hold and 'pulled' the asteroid towards the centre of the sun. I want to explore the mechanism by which the asteroid was 'pulled' in.
It could be this aura around the star that is causing this gravity by indirectly and passively providing a strong aura zone which any passing asteroid's particles would find hard to resist during their quantum leaps.
My view is that as the asteroid moved too close to the star, the particles of the asteroid were appearing more and more in the direction of the star because the aura strength was greater there then anywhere in the aura of the asteroid itself, and hence it seemed that the asteroid was being pulled into the centre of the star, when in fact the asteroid was pulling itself in!!
Yes, I said it, the asteroid is responsible for pulling itself into the star, because it is the asteroids particles that are moving into a higher aura zone, the star is just passively sitting there. And yes some atoms from the star appear in the asteroids aura but this amount is so minuscule that you would not detect the star movement easily unless the asteroid was large.
If the asteroid stays in orbit then that means that the momentum of the asteroid has equalled the strength of the aura around the star.
Ok, but what happens when an apple falls from a tree?
The way I see it is that even before the apple falls, it's particles are moving toward the centre of the earth's aura and returning to home base, but the force of this movement is not enough to pull the apple down because it's stalk is too strong. But once the stalk breaks then there is no upward force keeping the apple suspended and 'ALL' it's particles are free to migrate toward the centre of the earth's aura.
The majority of the particles that returned were always landing up in a region near to the center of the apple. Once the apple was free to move in space then some of the particles that returned home landed up slightly closer to the edge facing earth due to their pursuit of Aura strength. It is my belief that there is a force caused by this shuffling. Possibly caused by a nuclear force upon the particle's rebinding to the whole once more. So since more particles of the apple are rebinding closer to the earth side of the apple's center this causes a break in the equilibrium that was there while the stork was not broken.
Another way to see this movement is to look at how bee's find their pollen to make honey. Scouts go out, find the pollen and then come back and do a little dance to let the rest of the bees know where the flowers are. After this all the honey collecting bees know where they want to go.
The real difference here though is that each particle knows exactly where they want to go, they don't need to be shown, but they do have to obey some unknown statistical law which is probably linked to chaos theory.
Some Diagrams attached.
Planet/Asteroid gets caught by Star Gravity [ Invalid Attachment ]
Apple Falling to Earth's Surface [ Invalid Attachment ]