Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Thebox on 06/05/2018 11:47:06

Title: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 06/05/2018 11:47:06
The Theory of Everything!   by  S.P.Leese esquire


Abstract

This paper is intended to,  by use of a dialectic approach and observations ,  presenting  logical arguments and supporting evidence , conclude an objective absolute theory of everything .  Additionally explaining the natural gravitational phenomenon of ''neutral polarity being attracted to neutral polarity '' .  Finally, revealing the nature of life and existence.



Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: opportunity on 11/05/2018 14:29:24
S.P.Leese esquire

Is that your name?
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 11/05/2018 17:32:25
S.P.Leese esquire

Is that your name?


Indeed it is, I hope the mental institute does not come get me now :D

p.s no esquire on the end

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 12/05/2018 11:39:45
presenting  logical arguments and supporting evidence ,
That will be a first.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 12:01:15
presenting  logical arguments and supporting evidence ,
That will be a first.
Well I am kinda busy saving the Universe , call me Flash Gordon .


 [ Invalid Attachment ]




Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 12:11:16
Δ λ 0= λ

λ = FN>FN





Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 12:14:59
Colour is a gravitational invert of N .
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 12/05/2018 12:29:46
Colour is a gravitational invert of N .
Thanks for clarifying your position.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 12:32:23
Colour is a gravitational invert of N .
Thanks for clarifying your position.
Still wave-lengths between 400-700nm, that does not change.

added- Consider , energy travelling down a gravitational well then reflecting when it hits the bottom of the well, as it climbs back up the well, it is being pulled back down by the well. 

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 12:41:36
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 12:42:34
Light in a black hole can not climb out of the well.   A super dense mass such as a black sun , has so much gravity , light cannot escape the surface , it an absolute length contraction of visible light.

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 12:54:31
Darn't it, I messed up my thread, I posted in the wrong one ,
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: xersanozgen on 12/05/2018 13:25:17
 The theory of everything is ENERGY based. Materials, life, cognitive activities, evolutions, light, parapsikological events etc can be explained by energy.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 13:30:47
The theory of everything is ENERGY based.

Yup, but I meant to just  have a nice tidy thread for the theory of everything.   

Got carried away, I get excited sometime when I discover.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 15:30:30
Can we consider a photon to be a minuscule ''particle'' like energy, traversing through the fields?

A change in position of energy from point to point in a n-field?

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 15:38:14
A bit like this ?

 [ Invalid Attachment ]


Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 15:42:55
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 12/05/2018 16:08:34
can be explained by energy.

P.s 04d3322f152302e15e59732af1386109.gif=1

That bits easy .
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 11:03:15
Still waiting for anything that
(1) is a theory,
 and
(2) covers everything.
Otherwise this "theory of everything" is doing just fine.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 17:00:13
Still waiting for anything that
(1) is a theory,
 and
(2) covers everything.
Otherwise this "theory of everything" is doing just fine.

A+B=1

There you go plain and simple. There is better writers than me who will write it up .
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 18:17:10
A+B=1

There you go plain and simple. There is better writers than me who will write it up .
Plain, yes.
Simple, yes
Meaningful, No
And since it has no meaning, nobody can write it up for you
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 18:32:11
A+B=1

There you go plain and simple. There is better writers than me who will write it up .
Plain, yes.
Simple, yes
Meaningful, No
And since it has no meaning, nobody can write it up for you
A = 0.5
B = 0.5

a3f66d8fd5b6a233efd5c2aba0dc384a.gif  = 1 = t

P 04d3322f152302e15e59732af1386109.gif = ∞

ok?

added-

ea921dc0ecfd86b06cb8d9c0a21e1d1e.gif = 04d3322f152302e15e59732af1386109.gif  +  3712783d47b49cfae9baa99e5fc7480a.gif + 4929ddbee4554d5b9ba8621965c30c80.gif


Abstract

0.5→k←0.5

0.5 + 0.5 / k

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 18:44:42
Why is t always 1?
Why is k always 1?
What are t and k?
What's P and why is it always infinite?

...
and so on.
Like I said; it makes no sense.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 18:50:49
In the beginning there was an unknown volume of nothingness.   

Any given point of the unknown volume having 0 properties

Any given point of the unknown volume being a singularity in that it can have infinite dimensions.

Any given point of the unknown volume being under an infinite magnitude of zero point pressure .

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction

The opposite reaction to nothing is something

any given point manifests a mono pole electrostatic charge that dissipates

A/k and B/k

alpha waves and beta waves like ''strings''.

then at a single given point simultaneous manifests A+B which retains form and starts in an instant to expand by sucking in A and B from k
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 19:00:26
Why is t always 1?
Why is k always 1?
What are t and k?
What's P and why is it always infinite?
P is probability , 1 is four dimensions .  t is time and k is space

0+0=1
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 19:06:28
Calculate P for A+B simultaneously manifesting at the same geometrical point of  infinite k

P A + B / k = infinite

1/k0 where there is an infinite number of 0 points.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 19:17:03
Try this thought experiment

Write A on your left palm and B on your right palm

Then close both hands 

Open your left hand A/k

Open your right  hand B/k


Now imagine between your hands A+B happens,

Now clap your hands really hard and ''hear'' and ''see''  the big bang.


A→→AB←←B
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 19:22:28
They should of called it the Big inflation, the rest of the story , you know.

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 19:29:31
It doesn't make sense to have an infinite probability so your "theory" (really, i't's not even a hypothesis) is wrong
We can close the thread now.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 19:31:17
It doesn't make sense to have an infinite probability so your "theory" (really, i't's not even a hypothesis) is wrong
We can close the thread now.
It makes no sense to have an infinite probability yet I have demonstrated it mathematically and physically.

Nope, I am correct it is the only way to get something from nothing and a big bang.

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 19:36:14
I have a single red point and place it amongst an infinite amount of points, I ask you to random pick a point,

What is your chance of picking the red point?


1/∞ chance

I already know.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 21:16:35
I have a single red point and place it amongst an infinite amount of points, I ask you to random pick a point,

What is your chance of picking the red point?


1/∞ chance

I already know.

Practically zero.
And if you have a bunch of  points all of which are red and you ask me to pick one then the chance of me picking a red one is 1
All probabilities fall in the range zero to one.
0<= P <= 1
Which is why your "theory" which says that it's infinity is wrong.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 21:20:00
I have a single red point and place it amongst an infinite amount of points, I ask you to random pick a point,

What is your chance of picking the red point?


1/∞ chance

I already know.

Practically zero.
And if you have a bunch of  points all of which are red and you ask me to pick one then the chance of me picking a red one is 1
All probabilities fall in the range zero to one.
0<= P <= 1
Which is why your "theory" which says that it's infinity is wrong.



When 0 is an infinite whole , it is applicable. You are incorrect and my maths is correct.

>0=1
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 21:33:10
When 0 is an infinite whole , it is applicable.
Back to good old word salad again I see.
It's still not going to cut it as science.

It doe rather give the lie to your earlier assertion that
A+B=1

There you go plain and simple. There is better writers than me who will write it up .
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 21:35:23
When 0 is an infinite whole , it is applicable.
Back to good old word salad again I see.
It's still not going to cut it as science.


Which part do you not understand about an infinite amount of geometrical points? 

Any given point having a precise value of zero.  In other words , you can move one point along and the value remains zero.

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 21:40:53
The 0.5 + 0.5 way is the simple way

A = electron

B = proton


Then the other ways is in a way of fields which is for the expert user.

A=-0.5

B=0.5

Yes to understand , you have to accept and understand 1 = 0 and 0 =1 and 1+1=1

A = (-0.5) = (0.5) =(1)

B= (0.5) = (0.5) = (1)



Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 21:47:09
1 electron is half of an atom which is half of zero charge.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 22:24:47
You still can't have a probability more than 1 so you are still wrong.
Yes to understand , you have to accept and understand 1 = 0
That could be an issue sciencewise.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 13/05/2018 22:25:53
1 electron is half of an atom which is half of zero charge.
Nope, an electron is (at most) about 1/2000 of an atom by mass.
Your theory seems to be a theory of nothing.
Why not just accept that?
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 13/05/2018 22:30:50
1 electron is half of an atom which is half of zero charge.
Nope, an electron is (at most) about 1/2000 of an atom by mass.
Your theory seems to be a theory of nothing.
Why not just accept that?
A theory of nothing, yes you got that right , space is nothing alright.. Anyway not bothered T.O.E is old news to me now, I am on something better like ''cold'' energy.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 14/05/2018 08:57:39
GRRRRR, just no , I am not having it, you are insulting my intelligence.

Space is not tangible, it is verifiable that space cannot be destroyed. 

I am correct and ''you'' are incorrect. 

I am the hero of my story and the hero does not give in to subjective dogma and cognitive control,  the hero kick's ass on the dance floor.
Let's dance, I am the genius in this story , not ''you'' . 

For I am the God of science.


 
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Kryptid on 14/05/2018 20:48:02
For I am the God of science.

That's a new quote for my signature, right there.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 15/05/2018 21:08:53
I am on something
Looks that way.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 15/05/2018 21:12:59
I am on something
Looks that way.

Making up your own edits in quotes is breaking rules.

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 15/05/2018 22:05:55
It's impossible to know if I changed the meaning of your post, because you write in a way that deliberately obscures the meaning.


I am on something better like ''cold'' energy.

I gather that "energy" is used as a slang term for one of the synthetic cathinones.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 15/05/2018 22:16:51
I gather that "energy" is used as a slang term for one of the synthetic cathinones.
I thought I was using ambiguity! 

Well the synthetic cathinones come from having a cold bath , in fact really cold , like icy cold.  The problem is when dealing with winter, salt melts the ice and the ice turns into vapour.   
Now read that as you will, Bob Marley would not approve.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 16/05/2018 13:39:59
I do not think you could comprehend

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 18/05/2018 04:38:57
The Theory of Everything!   by  S.P.Leese esquire


Abstract

This paper is intended to by use of a dialectic approach and observations ,  presenting  logical arguments and supporting evidence , conclude an objective absolute theory of everything .  Additionally identifying the absolute rest reference frame of the Universe and concluding  the natural gravitational phenomenon of ''neutral polarity being attracted to neutral polarity '' . 


The Beginning

In the beginning there was an  infinite void of nothingness, formally known as space, that always was and will always be. The void cannot be created or destroyed, it  neither has the mechanism to be  dark or light and does not have a time mechanism. The void is timeless and has the absolute value of zero always.
Any given individual relative geometrical point of the infinite void having zero properties , any different  given point of the void being identical in zero properties but not identical in relative geometrical position .  Any given relative geometrical point being a part of the absolute rest reference frame void.  Adjoined points having no mechanism to be displaced or physicality to be tangible .
Additionally any given geometrical point is under an infinite amount of ZpP (zero point pressure), which I will explain in the next chapter
.

ZpP (Zero Point Pressure).


* ZpP.jpg (91.63 kB . 1442x794 - viewed 2315 times)



To be continued............
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: alancalverd on 18/05/2018 09:37:27
I was going to complain to the local sewage works, but I have just realised that the smell of bullshit is actually coming from this computer.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 18/05/2018 10:03:46
I was going to complain to the local sewage works, but I have just realised that the smell of bullshit is actually coming from this computer.
The same could be said about present science information.  The big bang explains the beginning from a hot gaseous state Universe, that obviously is not the beginning because the hot gaseous state formed some how.   At least my notion explains , well will explain where the ''hot gaseous state''(really energy) manifested from and the first ''spark'' that created the big bang. 
Now I have researched nothing literally , the only possible answer to get something from nothing is a miracle and zero point pressure manifesting static mono-pole charges that dissipate into the void.
Newton said , every action  has an equal and opposite reaction, the opposite reaction to doing nothing is doing something.  I understand you will struggle to get your mind around this, but whether you like it or not, it is objectively true and the absolute answer .
Also you are rather ignorant by shouting out it to be BS, show the readers a better version than this ?

Absolute space Newton, my reference so far to my notion.

 Next I will add a Dirac sea , then a big bang,  I will then add Einsteins space time, overlaying absolute space. 

What is your problem ? 

P.s Yes I am still awake from sometime yesterday, that is because I try hard and work hard trying to achieve something. I have plenty of time for sleeping when I am dead.




Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: xersanozgen on 18/05/2018 16:23:28
I know a person who examines the subject of zero point pressure or the geometer of point space.

If I can remember his name and link I 'll share.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 18/05/2018 18:22:11
I know a person who examines the subject of zero point pressure or the geometer of point space.

If I can remember his name and link I 'll share.
I am surprised ''they'' cannot ''see'' that my theory is the history of science put together to give  the answers they already had and did not realise it.
I told them a long time ago they had the answers but were just ''missing'' them .
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: xersanozgen on 22/05/2018 11:01:26
I know a person who examines the subject of zero point pressure or the geometer of point space.

If I can remember his name and link I 'll share.

I informed him about this forum  and topic.

My best regards...
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 24/05/2018 14:37:52
A + B = C

2A + 2B = 2C

3A + 3B = 3C

etc etc, hows my algebra looking? 

(A+B)*(A+B)=*C
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 24/05/2018 19:20:32
etc etc, hows my algebra looking? 
Wrong.
For example, let's try
 a=4
 b=3
a+b=c so c=7

And so (a+b)*(a+b)= 49
But you seem to say t's 7

OK, it could be a typo on your part.
But who cares.
The point you are not addressing is that the stuff you previously called algebra was nonsense.
And you were relying on that nonsense to make you "point".
So you r point was wrong (or, at best, unsupported)

Did you consider not posting dross?
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 24/05/2018 19:21:20
A + B = C

2A + 2B = 2C

3A + 3B = 3C

etc etc, hows my algebra looking? 

(A+B)*(A+B)=*C
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 24/05/2018 19:25:25
Wrong.
For example, let's try
 a=4
 b=3
a+b=c so c=7
Wrong, they are your values not mine.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 26/05/2018 21:00:36

The first aspect of this thread that shows it's on the road to nowhere was this
Colour is a gravitational invert of N .

There's no real point in further discussion until all the issues that have been raised are properly addressed.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 26/05/2018 21:36:24

The first aspect of this thread that shows it's on the road to nowhere was this
Colour is a gravitational invert of N .

There's no real point in further discussion until all the issues that have been raised are properly addressed.
Well I only need my own science, some funding, then I am out of here, meaning this planet.  You will see how poor my ideas are when the earth observes me leaving this planet in a star ship.  I do not have to answer to this planet once I have left ''your'' jail.
I will be free , just need a Prince of Dubai or somebody similar who fancies a journey into the oblivion , then we are gone .

Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Bored chemist on 26/05/2018 22:13:34
There's no real point in further discussion until all the issues that have been raised are properly addressed.
Title: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Post by: Thebox on 08/06/2018 02:12:57
There's no real point in further discussion until all the issues that have been raised are properly addressed.
Abstract

This  submitted  paper  intends  to  explain  a  new  theory  of  everything ,  explaining that everything is nothing and nothing is everything . 

Additonally  will  be  explained  the  fundamental  energy  source  that  preceeded  the  big  bang,  also  will  be  presented  an  alternative  version  of  the  Big  bang,  which  I will name for the purposes  of the  discussion,     Point  Zero Inflation.   

In  providing  this  conclusion  shall  also  be  established  a  new  model  of  an energy  based  mass  equivalent  ,  elementary  formation.   Similar  to  but  not  exact  to  the  present  atomic  model. 

Thus I name  this new energy equivalent, a   N-field (upper case N) energy particle.
 
Also  as  a  consequent  of  this  formation  is    an  expansive  isotropic  energy  field,  namely  a   n-field  (lower  case  n) .    This  paper  will  also  describe  the  proposed  N-field energy  particle  and  energy  n-field  in  both  being  a  binary  construct  of  two  parts,  consisting  of  a negative  energy  and  a  positive energy.   The  consequent  n-field weakening  in  magnitude  directly  and  proportional  to  the  inverse  square  law.

Penultimate,  the  simple  mathematical  model  will  sufficiently  describe  a  spacial   whole   where   the   summation   of   energy  is   nullified .   

Finally  will  be  shown  in conclusion  of  the  model ,    a  conclusion  that  identifies  the   natural  gravitation phenomenon  of  ''neutral''  is  attracted  to  ''neutral'' .