I don't need to present a sketch , the idea is simple: A chair which rotates slowly enough to pleasure people who are sitting to drink coffee , eating breakfast , or chatting The purpose of this slow rotation is to get pleasure of changing the direction of sight in open places , also to reduce boredom of sitting in one position. I think the idea is great. What do you think as you who might use it ?
Space is finite. If space is infinite ; mass will cause space-time to move to all directions"space-time won't be curved" and this displacement of space will spread at the speed of light, and there won't be any gravity.
If space is finite, there should be a point where it is fixed to " means this point won't be curved or displaced even if mass exists there " so that mass can curve space-time instead of moving it to all directions , this point which space is fixed to is the end of space.
Gravity speed is the speed of light, that indicates that space can't be curved if space is infinite, since the curvature idea in fact is not some mass curve space anywhere including infinity , and that because space-time curvature has a finite speed, at this case while gravity approaches 0 and never reach it , then there won't be a fixed point at which space ends, if so and space is infinite , space will move to all directions"no gravity ", so space is finite
Gravitational waves won't be caused by constant speed of matter. Matter at constant speed will change its position with respect to space-time, and place itself in new points in space-time, these new points of space-time will cause new curvature of space-time .
This new curvature can't exists at infinity since it starts at a momentat at points where there weren't previous curvature, in fact it will extend with the speed of light c.
All matter after the big bang can't be in a fixed position,So every object has gravity limited to a range extendable with the speed of light c.
If new gravity curvature extending at the speed of light can be detected then this will be a proof for my assumption.
We have two cases: An accelerated object causes gravitational waves and object at constant speed causes gravity expansions.
Space increment per time means increment in distance per time or increment in velocity, velocity increment causes increment in mass causes more pressure on space-time causes increment in space-time density.
However increment in space per time itself is increment in space-time density.
Inertia is the rate at which space resist pressure " increment in mass"or the rate at which density increases.
Is there any experiment to determine brain images resolution ? They appear to be of very low resolution . Does resolution differ from person to person, from thought to thought.Does it it change with brain diseases ? Does it differ if a person is tired , ill, afraid , etc Does resolution differs according to age? I search the internet but I couldn't find an answer. Or maybe just images quality for scientists to compare the above.
In light density equation , light density is inversely proportional to squared distance d, But this doesn't happen for all valuse of d, even though light beyond its range equals zero, according to this inverse squared law light density shouldn’t ever be zero. The graph of 1/d˛ is infinte, but when chooseing some point out of light range of d on this infinite graph it gives a value for density although light didn't reach there yet.
This contradiction refers to the equation as being merely mathematical.mathematically we have infinite numbers . physically we don’t. Beyond light density range, all values of distance r are not acceptable
For the equation to be physically as well as mathematically we have to consider that light didn’t yet reach places in the universe, 1/d^2 can’t express this , the graph of 1/d^2 gives options to all possible values of d to infinity which is wrong.
The graph of the equation 1/d^2 can’t be infinite , infinity is unreachable. It should have a real number length increases and continues forever.
The idea is we have a graph let say y=x^2 it starts at y=0 and x=0, this graphs moves “ let say we are drawing it” at particular speed, in away that we always have start “ the origin”an end or edge point for it.
Let’s use Lorentz transformation to derive the true equation of light density .We will then have another co-ordinate system , we put its origin at the end or edge of the graph 1/d^2, the graph 1/d^2 edge won’t exceed the another co-ordinate system , i.e we won’t have any graph at the other co-ordinate system.The new co-ordinate system has certain speed at which the new co-ordinate origin will always be at the end of the graph.Here the graph is not infinte line, infinity is unreachable, it has a certain length moves and extend at specific speed and the new co-ordinate moves as well in a way the new co-ordinate origin will always be at the end of the graph.Beyond the limit of the graph we can't calculate values since events didn't occur yet, notice the the co-ordinate systems are infinite they represent infinite space-time, however the graph represent finite events occured in this infinte space-time
In fact light density exist within its range , but beyond its range, density equals zero regardless of the value of x2 , since that graph doesn’t actually exist and x2=0 ,y2=0,z2=0, t2=0 , there is not time elapsed nor stance traveled, the events for light beyond its range are in the future they didn’t happen yet The new co-ordinate system starts at the event of light emission , within light range are past event, beyond its range are future events that didn’t happen.
We could use the transformation for speed of objects speedof an object at distance it traveled equals a certain value, speed of this object at places it didn’t reach equals zero ,because the time elapsed in the future equals zero “ it didn’t spend any time “ and the distance it raveled is also zero”it didn’t travel any distance.At each moment its graph will be at the origin with respect to future time and distance , it just started to elapse its future time.i.e t=0 and x=0
Lorentz transformation: x=(x2+vt2)/√(1-v˛/c˛)
x2=0, since the graph doesn't exist at the co-ordinate system of (x2,y2,z2,t2) t2=0 the graph doesn't exits there Then always x=0 , .t=0 beyond the graph since there is not time elabsed nor distance traveled density will always equal zero, t=0,x=0 speed of lght is zero , light didn't emitted the event didn't occur. then density is zero Also density equals zero since the graph doesn't exist there. x2=0, y2=0, z2=0, t2=0 only with respect to the graph"the graph doesn't exist" But x2, y2, z2, t2 have values with respect to space-time
As a conclusion any graph has a specific legnth extend with specific speed according Lorentz transformation, the graph doesn't exist beyond its edge, all values of the co-ordinate system byeond graph edge will equal zero. Light density inverse squared law is governed by this rule, the values of x,y,z,t beyond 1/d˛ graph all equall zero, so light speed will equal zero , light didn't emit and its density is zero.
x=0, t=0 beyond the graph an example is: "speed of an object at distance it traveled equals a certain value, speed of this object at places it didn’t reach equals zero ,because the time elapsed in thefuture equals zero “ it didn’t spend any time “ and the distance it raveled is also zero”it didn’t travel any distance", the object at any moment could be considered to be at the origin .Future valuse of time and distance are the values of this co-oridnate system, the object is at the origin its t=0 ,x=0 they remain zero since the object didn't move yet at that moment And this applies to all events in the universe, and it applies to gravity as well , gravity is not infinite , gravity has a limited range extendable with the speed of light c http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0013
We have problems in physics that involve simple arithmetic such as division of two numbers, for example the speed v of an object at stationary equals zero, the time it elapses t is zero and the distance it ravels is also zero, however 0/0 is not defined and although its speed has a defined value which is zero. Gravity at infinity equals zero, and that is according to the equation: F=GMm/r^2 , although the value infinity for r can't be added to the equation , but as r approaches infinity F approaches zero. Even though gravity at infinity equals zero but the expression : F=GMm/(infinity) is not defined.
Redfining simple arithmetic expressions: It acceptable that: 1+1=2, that is if we have one apple and we put another apple beside it then we will have a total of 2 apples. 4/2=2, that is if we have 4 apples and we want to divide them between two people , then we will give each person 2 apples.
Let's define other expressions with the same logic, these expressions are the subject of speaking: 4/0=0 , we have 4 apples and we want to divide them but we don't have anybody, then we won't divide at all , the process won't occur , in such case the number of apples we divide is zero.The result is zero apples have been divided.
0/0=0, we have nothing to divide and we have no people to divide between , then again the process won't occur at all and while we have nothing , we will divide nothing, and while we have no people then we have no-one to give them anything.The result is zero apples have been divided.
4/(infinity)=0 The same idea we have 4 apples but the number of people is not fixed they change and increases without bound then we can't do the process of dividing, and we can't give any apple to anyone.The process didn't occur and the result is 0 apples have been divided. Infinity here is not a point or a very large number, infinity is increment in the value of some variable continuously and without bound.
According to these definition of simple arithmetic expression, we can redfine some equations so that they have meaning: v=X/t=0/0=0, and that is at the origin when t=0 and x=0 F=GMm/r^2=GMm/(infinity)=0
Relativistic kinetic energy: K.E=mc˛/√(1-v˛/c˛)-mc˛ At the speed v=c for a mass, the expression √(1-v˛/c˛) will equal zero: K.E=mc˛/0 - mc˛ , K.E = 0-mc˛ K.E=-mc˛ But energyof mass m equals: E=mc˛ K.E=-E
The kinetic energy of a mass m moving at the speed of light c equals the energy of the mass, and that what is the kinetic energy of a photon is, the kinetic energy of a photon is its contained energy, the kinetic energy of a mass m moving at v=c is its contained energy E , i.e the energy of its mass
Why we have limited number of thing types in the universe? limited number of species , elements, plants, etc and we have these things to be made with intelligent creator , In my opinion the universe has intelligent instructions was at the time the universe was a point, we have several instructions , one to make even these things to exist" if there is not these instructions there will be only energy" , instructions to make different things, instructions to make laws for these things. These intelligent instructions exists at the time the universe exists, and these instructions contain all the universe pluralism, so there is not only energy there is also are these instructions driven by energy , the universe not have potential and energy only the universe also have intelligent instructions and create accurate things. Another thing is these intelligent instructions still exist and being driven by the energy in the universe,are these instructions God? perhaps, it still do things with instructions.Things on people and in the whole universe, it stopped in making and creating the universe, but it only sopped partially and still there.
A robot could be designed to react to an artificial pain anything, screaming, moving when is hit,, artificial sexual reacting towards another robot , even having sex with another robot, thinking as well , but this robot won't feel or aware of its own existence. Humans feels and aware of their existence, they aware of their themselves. What is different between a living creature and anything else is consciousness of their own existence , life composed of this awareness and things that distinguish them between a dead body like motion , however pain, joy, motion, feelings, reproduction is only part of life that can be shared between a living thing and a well designed robot but the only thing that distinguish humans and robots is our awareness of our existence. Awareness of something like pain is what makes us humans, it is not a problem for robot to feel and react to artificial pain but it will be a problem for humans , being aware of pain is what make us living beings
Gravity is not caused by space -time curvature , in fact there is not such curvature and there is not any proof of this curvature, vacuum is vacuum it is nothingness it can't be curved it in fact doesn't exist so it can't be curved.There must be a clear and logical explanation, not an imaginary curvature of space-time.
Two masses M and m will attract each other as a result of gravity force between these two masses: The existence of mass in a place causes non-existence of vacuum in that place, if there is mass then there is not vacuum, if there is vacuum then there is not mass.
When mass exist in a place and vacuum doesn't exist at that place , the mass will be attracted to fulfill this absence of vacuum, i.e there is gravity potential , mass is positive , absence of vacuum is negative. The mass causes a field just like magnets and charges, however this field is related deeply to matter level, it is about any matter in the universe, in this case the force of gravity appears between any mass as result of gravitational field that spread throughout the universe.
If there is magnetic and electrostatic field why not a gravitational field ? some kind of field that is related to matter We have positive and negative matter, positive matter is mass itself , negative matter is the absence of vacuum caused by the existence of mass, two masses will be attracted to each other, mass M will be attracted to fulfill mass m vacuum absence, mass m will be attracted to mass M to fulfill its vacuum absence, and we have a gravitational matter field exactly as we have fields for charges and magnets.
The idea of vacuum absence doesn't necessarily imply any curvature to vacuum, it doesn't mean vacuum exist an a way that it has absence and then it has curvature.Vacuum is nothingness,i.e it doesn't exist , and its absence is in fact another existence, of something else ,i.e mass. Vacuum doesn't exist by itself it doesn't behave in any way "curvature" but it could have absence status by the existence of something else" mass " If we have nothingness then we could have something else"mass" in this empty nothingness " vacuum", vacuum is nothingness it doesn't exist it doesn't curve but we could have deeper status of this nothingness'vacuum" which is the nothingness " absence" of nothingness" vacuum".
If this theory is about vacuum that doesn't mean the gravitational field I suggested is about vacuum , i.e vacuum or space-time curvature, the mass itself causes this field just like a magnet or charge and the absence of vacuum causes negative field ,and this field in fact interact with the absence of vacuum in the other mass, the absence of vacuum is negative, mass is positive and the vacuum itself is neutral , since vacuum itself is neutral it doesn't have any effects according to my theory but its absence has the effect which is negative field, matter is positive because it is something that exist , vacuum is neutral because it is non existence of matter and vacuum absence is negative since it is the non-existence of this non-existence.
The interaction between mass"positive" and the non-existence of vacuum"negative" induce the gravitational field of the mass and the non-existence of vacuum and causes gravity force.
Time is infinite,i.e time continues in the future infinitely , after we die we will spend, million years, billion years, going forward infinitely, there is not an end for time , or a point when time stops from elapsing. According to probability if we tried something infinitely, like tossing a die infinitely we will obtain all numbers at some time , 1,2,3,4,5, and 6, and that is for sure. Let consider time , the time spend after death is infinite , so the probability of a human being to come to life again is 100% , in fact any event in space has a probability to happen of 100%, the only event in space and vacuum could happen is a big bang in addition to what happened after the big bang” I believe matter came from nowhere before the big bang, and that is obvious matter can’t exist in the past infinitely, we can’t say mass existence spent infinite time in the past, infinity is not a real number” Some one might say, not everything could happen, for instance if we toss a die infinite times a 7 won’t appear at all , its probability is 0! But let”s consider coming to life again: As matter came from nowhere before the big bang, the possibility of multiple big bangs at infinite time is 100%, and the possibility of a repetition of our universe with its same scenario “ all of its history and all the same humans with same DNA who lived on earth” is also 100% , There might be infinite choices for our universe when it repeats and these choices will occur with a possibility of 100%.
Every human being in this world is aware that he will face death and some other problems in his life varies from person to person, religion is how we want to comfort ourselves that there is some kind of reward and another eternal life. Throughout history humans invented many gods to give them that satisfaction, they had delusions about the existence of some super powerful entity that control the world and rewards the righteous ones. Yes religious people have a new mental illness similar to psychosis , delusions and hallucinations , some people might saw Jesus or heard him which is completely delusional The reason religious people’s minds are weak is because of the series of incidents and shocks throughout their lives . Death idea is the main shock and there is also other incidents. We can notice the behavior and personality of religious people differs a lot than those who are not religious. Some of them are suicide bomber and that is a feature of severe depression What makes religious people don’t leave religion while it is obviously wrong and full of mistakes and contradictions? It is because the delusional state of mind, that is a delusional person thinks he is right with persistence while his beliefs are obviously wrong. If this is the case,i.e if religion is a new mental illness , there might be a cure for it in the future helping those who live a life of sadness and deprivation.
F=GmM/r˛ This equation is not valid and wrong. What is wrong with this equation? Mathematics equations are a away to measure quantities related to other quantities . Equations works for finite values, I measure r = 4 meters and find out F to be x Newtons Equations won't work for infinite values , that is equations themselves works finitely but not infinitely .
Let say F decreases without bound while r increases without bound, then the equation itself as a functional tool will approach infinity and the equation limit as r approaches ∞ is ∞, the equation is undefined and wrong. If the equation definition is the tool that finds values of F for each value of r, then I can't find all values of F for all values of r , then the equation won't work for all values of F and r and it is useless and invalid.That means the equation itself approaches ∞ in measuring the quantities and undefined
If space-time is infinite ,how gravity extends to infinity? we know infinity is unreachable because it continues forever and no-one reach a finite point.How gravity extends to infinite distances while infinity is unreachable? how gravity bends and curve space-time everywhere while space time end is unreachable? for gravity to bend space-time everywhere it should reach its end , how gravity bends space-time end while this end is unreachable?
In the gravitational equation the force is inversely proportional to the distance, as the distance gets bigger and bigger the force approaches zero. We can notice that force approaches zero “ a real number” but space approaches infinity” unreal number”
In the number line when moving to the right from for instance the number 3 to the number 4 there is a possibility of infinite numbers greater than 3 and less than 4 instead of reaching 4 a moving object could move infinitely to reach 4 and will never reach it. it will move for instance from 3.4 to 3.49 to 3.499 to infinity regardless its speed it won’t reach the 4 but in fact an object will reach the nearby number by passing infinite numbers gravity will reach zero by passing infinite numbers towards zero.