« on: 30/10/2009 01:29:17 »
There is a review of Goodfellow's paper "Can Gravity be Induced".
First I invite you to read Goodfellow's paper and "review". He proposes an Perpetuum Mobile as a source of the Sun's energy! First the matter falls into the Sun’s empty interior after that all solar plasma jumps back and the process repeats; This closed cycle is a source of the Sun’s energy: it is the violation of energy conservation laws. Goodfellow’s “solar model” do not use any kind of fuel as source of the Sun’s energy; In his imagination the energy appears from “nothing” in the closed GRAVAC cycle.
This "paper" is a free fantasy only; I don't found any logical reasoning in Goodfellow's writhings.
Were this post by any individual other than Constantin Leshan, I would respond point for point.
Consider Mr. Leshan's posting history: Without any attempt at contacting me and without a rudimentary web search to back up the veracity of his accusation, he posts on several forums that I am a plagiarizer, that I have stolen his work and re-published it as my own. The accusation caused my work to be temporarily removed from this and another forum.
By contacting the moderators and pointing out Mr's Leshan's accusations were nothing more than unfounded slander, and after the moderators did their own research, I was reinstated in both forums, Mr. Leshan was banned from the other one.
By degrees, he learns that my paper, "Can Gravity be Induced?" was published 16 years before his, after which he switches tactics and reverts to accusing me of plagiarizing earlier scientists, such as Rene Descartes (1596 – 1650).
Mr. leshan's publications bear no resemblance to my work other than my concepts governing absolute vacuums.
Nowhere do we see Mr. Leshan discussing the behavior of gravitational induction manipulation through plasma-induced absolute vacuum, or non-space.
Nowhere in his papers is the word "plasma" ever mentioned. He seems chiefly involved with abstract notions of teleportation.
Unlike my work, Mr. Leshan offors no predictions of undiscovered natural phenomena, no proposed repeatable laboratory experiment. My work does both.
For these reasons I consider Mr. Leshan irresponsible, and his Johnny-come-lately papers of no interest to me. Accusing me of plagiarizing is outright slander, so as far as Mr. Leshan is concerned my only duty is to point out the facts and let him wallow in his own pool of self-discontent.