I completely agreed with part of what you said. I accept your telling of history, but I disagree with your conclusion.How can you agree with the history then deny a conclusion based on the history that you have just agreed with? A history we still use today.
My dispute is not with the history, but your interpretation of it. The science of it, if you will.
one full rotation is also my observation point travelling a circumference distance)
Does it also matter how fast the Earth is orbiting the Sun, or how fast the Sun is orbiting the center of the galaxy, or how fast the whole galaxy is moving?
Please read the rest of my previous post:
Again, you are confusing time and space. 462.69 meters cannot be equal to any amount of time just as there is no number of dolphins equal to a rat. A car traveling at 5 meters per second does not imply that 5 = 462.69 just as a photon traveling at 299792458 meters per second does not imply that 299792458 = 462.69. This apparent paradox doesn't mean that our measurement of time is completely wrong, it means that yours is.
seconds ≠ meters
dolphins ≠ rats
speed has units of meters per second, or miles per hour, or feet per minute, or whatever unit of length per unit time you want to use. There is nothing special about the "speed of Earth's rotation"
Can you find any merit in any of my questions or points?