« on: 31/10/2017 14:03:12 »
Funny how you call anybody who questions your ideas a troll when you said when your thread was locked 'I will just go ''sock' all the other forums again to find conversation' and 'Please Ban me now and I promise never to return as a sock.'Wow a troll who thinks in some way he can troll me. You are just being awkward . If I want to call a concept in my mind Eviscosity, I will call it Eviscosity or anything else I want to call it. It is not your say to tell me in my own notions what I have to call things.They are made up by somebody but usually a definition is given to explain the word and concept. You just seem to pluck things from the air without explanation and claiming it is a new concept.You are really not very smart are you? All words are made up to define something, new things have no definition therefore have new words and meanings to define that new something.New theories yes. Made up words no. You earlier claimed on another thread that this word existed to explain a specific phenomena. You don't have a very good relationship with the truth do you?As pointed out elsewhere, 'eviscosity' is a word you have made up. Like 'n-field'.As pointed out before , this is a new theories section so don't always expect conventional words that you know.
It would be like me saying to Minowski, space-time is a made up a word so you can't use that.
You said on the other post about evicosity:
'Well actually if you looked it up, it would stand for extensional viscosity although I am using it a sense of energy viscosity.'
I did look it up and there was no such word. So you lied.
As for smart, I am not the one that is fooled by doctored hieroglyphics and thinks that they are proof of aliens living amongst us..
We are talking about energy density, so quite obvious the word is related to energy density.
For example two individual polar opposite fields have 0 Eviscosity relative to each other.
Two individual likewise polarity field have a Eviscosity=1
Two merged opposite fields have Eviscosity=0.5 or it might be 2
All a part of my Q.F.S notion.
added- If you want to help, write the maths for the inverse square law in reverse to create my T.S.L (transverse square law).
If this is not an admission of trolling multiple forums I don't know what is.