I wonder what the thing under the rocks
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Acceleration the rate in increment in velocity .A photon doesn't accelerate .The photon velocity can not increase more than c .Deceleration is different .Deceleration is the rate of reduction in velocity a photon can have a reduction in its speed and this true ..A photon will not have any acceleration in any circumstances in the universe .Ah, so you are denying the existence of gravitational lensing. That's good to know.
A photon will not have any acceleration in any circumstances in the universe . Its speed can change but it jumps from a velocity value to another velocity value .Inertia is the resistance to change in velocity or to gain acceleration .A Photon also has gravity because a photon is energy , both energy and rest mass have gravity .A photon then does not have an inertia .Actually, it does. A photon falls towards a source of gravity at the same rate as an object with mass does.
They workMass/ energy is just confusion and have no meaningThe fact that nuclear bombs work is proof that you are wrong.
In any case, every test of special relativity to date has passed. So if you are positing that special relativity has a flaw, then it is significantly more likely that you are mistaken than relativity being mistaken. Unless, of course, you can point out the flaws in the experiments. Can you?There is not a proof for relativistic mass .That is there is not a proof that mass increases and decelerate and prevent itself from reaching c.
The term "photon" is very specific. It refers to the quantum of the electromagnetic force. It is a boson particle with a spin of one, is electrically-neutral and does not have a rest mass. It something does not have those characteristics, then it isn't a photon.Energy due to motion and energy of photon are both energy .I'm comparing between energy due to motion and the energy we know that a photon contains
Einstein considers a moving object with its rest mass and other energy as a whole mass in his equations , then mass is just energy and energy is just mass if a photon is energy then it is just a mass , it is a mass moves at c which it shouldn't. He does't distinguish between mass and energy in his theory and equations or mass/energy equivalencehe says mass or energy "light" shouldn't move at c.I am not aware of anywhere in special relativity that states that energy cannot move at c.
Einstein knew perfectly well that lightHe knew light is energy and it travels with c but he says mass or energy "light" shouldn't move at c.
(1) has energy and
(2) travels at the speed of light
If you are, instead, trying to assert that light doesn't move at the speed of light and you are trying to convince us that it doesn't, this is belongs in the New Theory section.I'm speaking about a contradiction in special relativity.
Are you aware that rock climbers are able to support themselves using just their fingers?Can you do that ? but every person can stand on toes.
So, as usual, there doesn't seem to be a problem to solve.There is a difference between putting a load on toes tips, putting the load on toes, and and putting it on feet balls . A human can stand on toes tips, toes , or a compilation of toes and feet balls .I can stand on my toes only with ease. But if the person on the link put the loads on toes only " and without wearing shoes " they will break joints.
Ballet dancers stand on the toes, but they have reinforced shoes to support them.Of course they need shoes to stand on toes tips since the force I suggested is small but not zero also giving in consideration the toes tips are sensitive
To humans only but not to other masses, and I referred to humans only because it is a better example " everyone can test it"So why did you state earlier 'It is biological that this phenomenon appears only to humans.'?It looks like he just makes this up as he goes along and forgets what he wrote earlier. This results in him contradicting himself a lot.
There is no mathematics for this exact part.It is biological that this phenomenon appears only to humans.It is like physiologically human body stop working after death .
The phenomenon related only to gravity on a human body that is the toes won't bear for instance "equivalent to human body " 80 kg mass put on it it.That will press the toes extremely hard.
Thanks.It is biological that this phenomenon appears only to humans.And several other bipedal species from Tyrannosaurus to chickens. And all quadruped mammals walk on fewer toes than bipeds.
Bones are stronger than concrete.It is not just about breaking bones or tendons.It is a whole collection of factors. The 80 kg mass will cause huge pain, cutting flesh, breaking joints, and above all pressing the toes extremely hard.
On a weight for weight basis tendons are stronger than steel.
I'm waiting for you to supply the math shows that toes can't bear the weight of the body.There is no mathematics for this exact part.It is biological that this phenomenon appears only to humans.It is like physiologically human body stop working after death .