Search key words:
Is gravity range limited ?
Is gravity range limited ?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I haven't ever been sitting at a meal and thought, "I wish I was spinning right now".Why do you want to eat and vomit while you can do a big list of other things.
kinetic energy=mc²/1-v²/c² - mc²E=mc^2 is not the true equation for photons
Mass and energy are equivalent, so it has to work for photons just as much as any other particle.
This is the contained energy of a mass , photon energy equation is hf, h=plank constant , f=photon frequencyYou are wrong ., the relativistic mass doesn't depend on its energy What equation says that?
This example says simply that 0-3=-3, you do not even understand how to define expressions in words, 0 is 0 , dropping is - , and 3 is 3 , so it is just 0 - 3.The expression 0 - 3 = - 3has no meaning in wordsIt was freezing (i.e. 0 degrees C) and the temperature dropped by three degrees.
It is now minus three degrees.
How this appears defined to you?In fact 0-3 appears to be undefined.In fact it only appears that way to you.
They are undefined so they are already not solving division problem
If they have nothing to do with division then they can't be the answer to a division problem.
zero in reality and the natural world means the absence of things , zero people , zero buses, etc, if we have 4 people who left a room , then in this room we have zero people, if we have zero people in the room then we won't give them anything because they are absent , even if you have the the 4 apples4 apples are to be divided between 0 people, the result is zero apples will be given to zero people , since zero is a number.
Actually, you would be giving four apples to zero people.
if you follow your own logic, this should mean that 0 - 3 = 0, since you end up with zero apples if you literally try to take three apples out of an empty bucket.You can't use my own logic to prove me wrong, my logic is my logic I'm the only one who is responsible of its results
Claiming that not doing division is the same as doing division is actually objectively stupid.OK forget about non-division, we are dividing:
Okay, if I want to solve 5 x 7, I can stop doing multiplication and use non-multiplication to get an answer (0) and then claim that is the answer to the original multiplication equation (5 x 7 = 0). That's no different than what you are doing. It's crazy. It's stupid. It's wrong.Stop using multiplication result in several options" that result in 0" , you can't use what you want, however if you stopped using multiplication it just means you are not using it , it doesn't imply you are using something else.
At the very best, you are wrong because KE- 1/2 mv^2You are wrong , this is Newton's old equation replaced by Einstein equation.
The relativistic mass of a photon is undefined , it equals 0/0: m=m0/(1- v²/c²), m0=0, v=cYou are wrong ., the relativistic mass doesn't depend on its energy. What equation says that? photon energy is hf, h=planks constant and f= photon frequency. And relativistic mass is always 0 even if light changed its frequency and its energy because photon is massless and its rest mass is always zero.See the equation in this post
That makes perfect sense.
The relativistic mass of a photon depends on the energy.
So it does not have a defined value in terms of v and c because they do not define the energy of a photon.
It's crazy. It's stupid. It's wrong.It is wrong but It is not stupid, discovering a new theory is hard , my threads and posts are deep , I bet if you try so you will post garbage, you are not even able to do it, you do not and never have new ideas in your mind,.