0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

---------------Semilatus----- Prec. per rev.---Rev.per century-- Prec. per century------------------Rectum-------(arc sec)-- (arc sec)- Mercury--------.55.44------- .1034---------- 414.937---------- 42.9195Venus----------108.19-------- .0530--------- 162.6016-----------8.6186Earth-----------149.55.----- .0383 ---------- 100.000----------- 3.8345

i believe that Mars or Venus does just that.

HE ONLY WAY THAT ANOMALOUS PRECESSION IS ARRIVED/RESOLVED..BY WORKING BACK..

Go back and read reply #44. Einstein had no way of knowing what the precession rate of the Hulse-Taylor binary would be, yet his equation predicts it accurately. You can't work backwards from data you don't have.

Einstein’s theory of relativity says that, for something moving very fast, such as a satellite, time would seem to move more slowly compared with something standing still on the Earth. Van Flandern has argued that clock rates on GPS satellites should therefore need to be adjusted continuously to keep them synchronised with users on Earth. But they’re not, he told Tom Bethell, a senior editor of The American Spectator magazine and author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science. The GPS programmers don’t need relativity. “They have basically blown off Einstein,” Van Flandern said.

Quote from: mad aetherist on 19/02/2019 23:09:22Einstein’s theory of relativity says that, for something moving very fast, such as a satellite, time would seem to move more slowly compared with something standing still on the Earth. Van Flandern has argued that clock rates on GPS satellites should therefore need to be adjusted continuously to keep them synchronised with users on Earth. But they’re not, he told Tom Bethell, a senior editor of The American Spectator magazine and author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science. The GPS programmers don’t need relativity. “They have basically blown off Einstein,” Van Flandern said.The clocks are deliberately set to run at the "wrong" rate when on Earth.That was carefully set up so that they would run at the right rate when in orbit."To compensate for the discrepancy, the frequency standard on board each satellite is given a rate offset prior to launch, making it run slightly slower than the desired frequency on Earth; specifically, at 10.22999999543 MHz instead of 10.23 MHz.[17] Since the atomic clocks on board the GPS satellites are precisely tuned, it makes the system a practical engineering application of the scientific theory of relativity in a real-world environment.[18] Placing atomic clocks on artificial satellites to test Einstein's general theory was proposed by Friedwardt Winterberg in 1955.[19]" From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_analysis_for_the_Global_Positioning_System#Special_and_general_relativityGPS is one of the best known proofs that relativity is right.

Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/02/2019 19:11:47Quote from: mad aetherist on 19/02/2019 23:09:22Einstein’s theory of relativity says that, for something moving very fast, such as a satellite, time would seem to move more slowly compared with something standing still on the Earth. Van Flandern has argued that clock rates on GPS satellites should therefore need to be adjusted continuously to keep them synchronised with users on Earth. But they’re not, he told Tom Bethell, a senior editor of The American Spectator magazine and author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science. The GPS programmers don’t need relativity. “They have basically blown off Einstein,” Van Flandern said.The clocks are deliberately set to run at the "wrong" rate when on Earth.That was carefully set up so that they would run at the right rate when in orbit."To compensate for the discrepancy, the frequency standard on board each satellite is given a rate offset prior to launch, making it run slightly slower than the desired frequency on Earth; specifically, at 10.22999999543 MHz instead of 10.23 MHz.[17] Since the atomic clocks on board the GPS satellites are precisely tuned, it makes the system a practical engineering application of the scientific theory of relativity in a real-world environment.[18] Placing atomic clocks on artificial satellites to test Einstein's general theory was proposed by Friedwardt Winterberg in 1955.[19]" From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_analysis_for_the_Global_Positioning_System#Special_and_general_relativityGPS is one of the best known proofs that relativity is right. Rubbish. It is evidence not proof. It is evidence for an infinite number of postulates, especially for aetherwind & neoLorentz Relativity, but not so much for Einsteinian Relativity. Hatch mentions this. We have been throo all of this before. However i might have changed my tune since then.What i now reckon is that both Rs are wrong, i reckon that ER correctly includes the slowing of light near mass, ie i am now thinking that Shapiro Delay is correct (but for wrong reasons), & that (1) slowing must affect LC & TD (in addition to the V of the aetherwind affecting gamma & affecting LD & TD (2)). Einstein's relative-v we know does not work in Lorentz's gamma (see the Twins Contradiction)(it aint a paradox). This 2nd aspect of LC & TD is what made me invent Photaenos, the cause of em radiation (& the cause of refraction)(& the cause of the double bending of light near the Sun etc).

especially for aetherwind

Quote from: mad aetherist on 20/02/2019 21:44:30especially for aetherwindYour aetherwind hypothesis makes numerical predictions for time dilation?

COMPARE THE SIMPLE MATH COMPUTATION, USING SEMILATUS RECTUM COMPUTATION B TO RELATIVISTIC COMPUTATION PER ANNEX B. SEE THE FIGURES FOR ALL PLANETS. THEY ARE THE SAME AND EXACT.!!IT PROVES THAT THE COMPUTATION OF DR. EINSTEIN IS THAT WAY, WORK BACK. jsaQuote:Non-sequitur. How does it prove that he worked backwards? Because the comparative figures match perfectly.

Aetherists dont believe in time nor time dilation

COMPARE THE SIMPLE MATH COMPUTATION, USING SEMILATUS RECTUM COMPUTATION B TO RELATIVISTIC COMPUTATION PER ANNEX B. SEE THE FIGURES FOR ALL PLANETS. THEY ARE THE SAME AND EXACT.!!IT PROVES THAT THE COMPUTATION OF DR. EINSTEIN IS THAT WAY, WORK BACK. jsa

Quote:Non-sequitur. How does it prove that he worked backwards? Because the comparative figures match perfectly.

Quote from: mad aetherist on 23/02/2019 05:54:18Aetherists dont believe in time nor time dilationWell, time dilation is an experimentally demonstrated fact, nd it has been so for decadeshttps://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/09/16/hafele-keating-experiment-two-atomic-clocks-flew-twice-around-world-eastward-westward-back-home-showed-different-times/so what you are saying is that you don't believe in reality.

Do translate into simple math equation easily understood by all, that relativistic astronomical computation of Dr. Einstein how he solved that anomalous precession of Mercury (jsa 2.24.19)

Jsaldea12: I don’t assume. I did it, translate that complicated astronomical math of relativity into simple algedric equation a high school student can understand. Feb. 24, 2019

How can we be sure this is the correct relativistic computation., refer to Computation B